A comparison of relative survival and cause‐specific survival methods to measure net survival in cancer populations
Abstract Background Accurate cancer survival statistics are necessary for describing population‐level survival patterns and measuring advancements in cancer care. Net cancer survival is measured using two methods: cause‐specific survival (CSS) and relative survival (RS). Both are valid methodologies...
Main Authors: | Nupur Makkar, Quinn T. Ostrom, Carol Kruchko, Jill S. Barnholtz‐Sloan |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2018-09-01
|
Series: | Cancer Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1706 |
Similar Items
-
Attributing death to cancer: cause-specific survival estimation.
by: Mathew A, et al.
Published: (2002-10-01) -
Correcting for misclassification and selection effects in estimating net survival in clinical trials
by: Juste Aristide Goungounga, et al.
Published: (2019-05-01) -
Cause of death for patients with breast cancer: discordance between death certificates and medical files, and impact on survival estimates
by: Hava Izci, et al.
Published: (2021-06-01) -
Are 90% of deaths from cancer caused by metastases?
by: Hanna Dillekås, et al.
Published: (2019-09-01) -
Comparative Brain and Central Nervous System Tumor Incidence and Survival between the United States and Taiwan based on Population-Based Registry
by: Li-Nien Chien, et al.
Published: (2016-07-01)