Utilizing Production Viable Valve Strategies at Elevated Speeds and Loads to Improve Volumetric Efficiency via Intake Valve Modulation

Valvetrain flexibility enables the optimization of the engine’s ability to breathe across the operating range, resulting in more efficient operation. The authors have shown the merit of improving volumetric efficiency via valvetrain flexibility to improve fuel efficiency at elevated engine speeds in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kalen R. Vos, Gregory M. Shaver, James McCarthy, Lisa Farrell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmech.2018.00002/full
id doaj-f822bffe0ebd40ddb4e3639f8d4e6a8c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f822bffe0ebd40ddb4e3639f8d4e6a8c2020-11-24T21:33:46ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering2297-30792018-02-01410.3389/fmech.2018.00002318748Utilizing Production Viable Valve Strategies at Elevated Speeds and Loads to Improve Volumetric Efficiency via Intake Valve ModulationKalen R. Vos0Gregory M. Shaver1James McCarthy2Lisa Farrell3Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United StatesPurdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United StatesEaton Valvetrain Engineering, Marshall, MI, United StatesCummins Technical Center, Columbus, OH, United StatesValvetrain flexibility enables the optimization of the engine’s ability to breathe across the operating range, resulting in more efficient operation. The authors have shown the merit of improving volumetric efficiency via valvetrain flexibility to improve fuel efficiency at elevated engine speeds in the previous work. This study focuses on production viable solutions targeting similar volumetric efficiency benefits via delayed intake valve closure at these elevated engine speeds. Specifically, the production viable solutions include reducing the duration at peak lift and reducing the amount of hardware required to achieve a delayed intake closure timing. It is demonstrated through simulation that delayed intake valve modulation at an elevated speed (2,200 RPM) and load (12.7 bar BMEP) is capable of improving volumetric efficiency via a production viable lost motion enabled boot profile shape. Phased and dwell profiles were also evaluated. These profiles were compared against each other for two separately simulated cases: (1) modulating both intake valves per cylinder and (2) modulating one of the two intake valves per cylinder. The boot, phase, and dwell profiles demonstrate volumetric efficiency improvements of up to 3.33, 3.41, and 3.5%, respectively, for two-valve modulation, while realizing 2.79, 2.59, and 3.01%, respectively, for single-valve modulation. As a result, this article demonstrates that nearly all of the volumetric efficiency benefits achieved while modulating IVC via dwell profiles are possible with production viable boot and phased profiles.http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmech.2018.00002/fullvariable valve actuationvolumetric efficiencyintake bootintake phasingintake dwellintake valve modulation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kalen R. Vos
Gregory M. Shaver
James McCarthy
Lisa Farrell
spellingShingle Kalen R. Vos
Gregory M. Shaver
James McCarthy
Lisa Farrell
Utilizing Production Viable Valve Strategies at Elevated Speeds and Loads to Improve Volumetric Efficiency via Intake Valve Modulation
Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering
variable valve actuation
volumetric efficiency
intake boot
intake phasing
intake dwell
intake valve modulation
author_facet Kalen R. Vos
Gregory M. Shaver
James McCarthy
Lisa Farrell
author_sort Kalen R. Vos
title Utilizing Production Viable Valve Strategies at Elevated Speeds and Loads to Improve Volumetric Efficiency via Intake Valve Modulation
title_short Utilizing Production Viable Valve Strategies at Elevated Speeds and Loads to Improve Volumetric Efficiency via Intake Valve Modulation
title_full Utilizing Production Viable Valve Strategies at Elevated Speeds and Loads to Improve Volumetric Efficiency via Intake Valve Modulation
title_fullStr Utilizing Production Viable Valve Strategies at Elevated Speeds and Loads to Improve Volumetric Efficiency via Intake Valve Modulation
title_full_unstemmed Utilizing Production Viable Valve Strategies at Elevated Speeds and Loads to Improve Volumetric Efficiency via Intake Valve Modulation
title_sort utilizing production viable valve strategies at elevated speeds and loads to improve volumetric efficiency via intake valve modulation
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering
issn 2297-3079
publishDate 2018-02-01
description Valvetrain flexibility enables the optimization of the engine’s ability to breathe across the operating range, resulting in more efficient operation. The authors have shown the merit of improving volumetric efficiency via valvetrain flexibility to improve fuel efficiency at elevated engine speeds in the previous work. This study focuses on production viable solutions targeting similar volumetric efficiency benefits via delayed intake valve closure at these elevated engine speeds. Specifically, the production viable solutions include reducing the duration at peak lift and reducing the amount of hardware required to achieve a delayed intake closure timing. It is demonstrated through simulation that delayed intake valve modulation at an elevated speed (2,200 RPM) and load (12.7 bar BMEP) is capable of improving volumetric efficiency via a production viable lost motion enabled boot profile shape. Phased and dwell profiles were also evaluated. These profiles were compared against each other for two separately simulated cases: (1) modulating both intake valves per cylinder and (2) modulating one of the two intake valves per cylinder. The boot, phase, and dwell profiles demonstrate volumetric efficiency improvements of up to 3.33, 3.41, and 3.5%, respectively, for two-valve modulation, while realizing 2.79, 2.59, and 3.01%, respectively, for single-valve modulation. As a result, this article demonstrates that nearly all of the volumetric efficiency benefits achieved while modulating IVC via dwell profiles are possible with production viable boot and phased profiles.
topic variable valve actuation
volumetric efficiency
intake boot
intake phasing
intake dwell
intake valve modulation
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmech.2018.00002/full
work_keys_str_mv AT kalenrvos utilizingproductionviablevalvestrategiesatelevatedspeedsandloadstoimprovevolumetricefficiencyviaintakevalvemodulation
AT gregorymshaver utilizingproductionviablevalvestrategiesatelevatedspeedsandloadstoimprovevolumetricefficiencyviaintakevalvemodulation
AT jamesmccarthy utilizingproductionviablevalvestrategiesatelevatedspeedsandloadstoimprovevolumetricefficiencyviaintakevalvemodulation
AT lisafarrell utilizingproductionviablevalvestrategiesatelevatedspeedsandloadstoimprovevolumetricefficiencyviaintakevalvemodulation
_version_ 1725952131843751936