Utilizing Production Viable Valve Strategies at Elevated Speeds and Loads to Improve Volumetric Efficiency via Intake Valve Modulation
Valvetrain flexibility enables the optimization of the engine’s ability to breathe across the operating range, resulting in more efficient operation. The authors have shown the merit of improving volumetric efficiency via valvetrain flexibility to improve fuel efficiency at elevated engine speeds in...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018-02-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmech.2018.00002/full |
id |
doaj-f822bffe0ebd40ddb4e3639f8d4e6a8c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f822bffe0ebd40ddb4e3639f8d4e6a8c2020-11-24T21:33:46ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering2297-30792018-02-01410.3389/fmech.2018.00002318748Utilizing Production Viable Valve Strategies at Elevated Speeds and Loads to Improve Volumetric Efficiency via Intake Valve ModulationKalen R. Vos0Gregory M. Shaver1James McCarthy2Lisa Farrell3Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United StatesPurdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United StatesEaton Valvetrain Engineering, Marshall, MI, United StatesCummins Technical Center, Columbus, OH, United StatesValvetrain flexibility enables the optimization of the engine’s ability to breathe across the operating range, resulting in more efficient operation. The authors have shown the merit of improving volumetric efficiency via valvetrain flexibility to improve fuel efficiency at elevated engine speeds in the previous work. This study focuses on production viable solutions targeting similar volumetric efficiency benefits via delayed intake valve closure at these elevated engine speeds. Specifically, the production viable solutions include reducing the duration at peak lift and reducing the amount of hardware required to achieve a delayed intake closure timing. It is demonstrated through simulation that delayed intake valve modulation at an elevated speed (2,200 RPM) and load (12.7 bar BMEP) is capable of improving volumetric efficiency via a production viable lost motion enabled boot profile shape. Phased and dwell profiles were also evaluated. These profiles were compared against each other for two separately simulated cases: (1) modulating both intake valves per cylinder and (2) modulating one of the two intake valves per cylinder. The boot, phase, and dwell profiles demonstrate volumetric efficiency improvements of up to 3.33, 3.41, and 3.5%, respectively, for two-valve modulation, while realizing 2.79, 2.59, and 3.01%, respectively, for single-valve modulation. As a result, this article demonstrates that nearly all of the volumetric efficiency benefits achieved while modulating IVC via dwell profiles are possible with production viable boot and phased profiles.http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmech.2018.00002/fullvariable valve actuationvolumetric efficiencyintake bootintake phasingintake dwellintake valve modulation |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Kalen R. Vos Gregory M. Shaver James McCarthy Lisa Farrell |
spellingShingle |
Kalen R. Vos Gregory M. Shaver James McCarthy Lisa Farrell Utilizing Production Viable Valve Strategies at Elevated Speeds and Loads to Improve Volumetric Efficiency via Intake Valve Modulation Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering variable valve actuation volumetric efficiency intake boot intake phasing intake dwell intake valve modulation |
author_facet |
Kalen R. Vos Gregory M. Shaver James McCarthy Lisa Farrell |
author_sort |
Kalen R. Vos |
title |
Utilizing Production Viable Valve Strategies at Elevated Speeds and Loads to Improve Volumetric Efficiency via Intake Valve Modulation |
title_short |
Utilizing Production Viable Valve Strategies at Elevated Speeds and Loads to Improve Volumetric Efficiency via Intake Valve Modulation |
title_full |
Utilizing Production Viable Valve Strategies at Elevated Speeds and Loads to Improve Volumetric Efficiency via Intake Valve Modulation |
title_fullStr |
Utilizing Production Viable Valve Strategies at Elevated Speeds and Loads to Improve Volumetric Efficiency via Intake Valve Modulation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Utilizing Production Viable Valve Strategies at Elevated Speeds and Loads to Improve Volumetric Efficiency via Intake Valve Modulation |
title_sort |
utilizing production viable valve strategies at elevated speeds and loads to improve volumetric efficiency via intake valve modulation |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering |
issn |
2297-3079 |
publishDate |
2018-02-01 |
description |
Valvetrain flexibility enables the optimization of the engine’s ability to breathe across the operating range, resulting in more efficient operation. The authors have shown the merit of improving volumetric efficiency via valvetrain flexibility to improve fuel efficiency at elevated engine speeds in the previous work. This study focuses on production viable solutions targeting similar volumetric efficiency benefits via delayed intake valve closure at these elevated engine speeds. Specifically, the production viable solutions include reducing the duration at peak lift and reducing the amount of hardware required to achieve a delayed intake closure timing. It is demonstrated through simulation that delayed intake valve modulation at an elevated speed (2,200 RPM) and load (12.7 bar BMEP) is capable of improving volumetric efficiency via a production viable lost motion enabled boot profile shape. Phased and dwell profiles were also evaluated. These profiles were compared against each other for two separately simulated cases: (1) modulating both intake valves per cylinder and (2) modulating one of the two intake valves per cylinder. The boot, phase, and dwell profiles demonstrate volumetric efficiency improvements of up to 3.33, 3.41, and 3.5%, respectively, for two-valve modulation, while realizing 2.79, 2.59, and 3.01%, respectively, for single-valve modulation. As a result, this article demonstrates that nearly all of the volumetric efficiency benefits achieved while modulating IVC via dwell profiles are possible with production viable boot and phased profiles. |
topic |
variable valve actuation volumetric efficiency intake boot intake phasing intake dwell intake valve modulation |
url |
http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmech.2018.00002/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kalenrvos utilizingproductionviablevalvestrategiesatelevatedspeedsandloadstoimprovevolumetricefficiencyviaintakevalvemodulation AT gregorymshaver utilizingproductionviablevalvestrategiesatelevatedspeedsandloadstoimprovevolumetricefficiencyviaintakevalvemodulation AT jamesmccarthy utilizingproductionviablevalvestrategiesatelevatedspeedsandloadstoimprovevolumetricefficiencyviaintakevalvemodulation AT lisafarrell utilizingproductionviablevalvestrategiesatelevatedspeedsandloadstoimprovevolumetricefficiencyviaintakevalvemodulation |
_version_ |
1725952131843751936 |