Comparing self-determination theory and the L2 motivational self system and their relationships to L2 proficiency

This study empirically compares two often-utilized motivation theories in L2 studies: self-determination theory and the L2 motivational self system. It also examines the relationships among their motivational constructs, learners’ intended L2 learning effort, and L2 proficiency. While a number of st...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chika Takahashi, Seongah Im
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Department of English Studies Faculty of Pedagogy and Fine Arts Adam Mickiewicz University 2020-12-01
Series:Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching
Subjects:
Online Access:https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/ssllt/article/view/17399
id doaj-f82531aaf3ee4614bc967f869565ea35
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f82531aaf3ee4614bc967f869565ea352021-01-01T16:36:42ZengDepartment of English Studies Faculty of Pedagogy and Fine Arts Adam Mickiewicz UniversityStudies in Second Language Learning and Teaching2083-52052084-19652020-12-01104673696 Comparing self-determination theory and the L2 motivational self system and their relationships to L2 proficiency Chika Takahashi0Seongah Im1Ehime University, Matsuyama, JapanUniversity of Hawai’i at Mānoa, USA This study empirically compares two often-utilized motivation theories in L2 studies: self-determination theory and the L2 motivational self system. It also examines the relationships among their motivational constructs, learners’ intended L2 learning effort, and L2 proficiency. While a number of studies have utilized these models in order to examine second language learners’ motivation, there has not been a thorough comparison of the two. Furthermore, while many studies have demonstrated the structural relationships between the motivational constructs of the two theories and the learner’s self-reported amount of effort, fewer studies have examined their L2 achievement. The results of this study indicated that the constituents in the two theories are correlated as predicted. Furthermore, while internalized types of motivation in self-determination theory predicted intended learning effort, which then led to L2 proficiency, the strength of the ideal L2 self was much weaker than the L2 learning experience, unlike what is argued in the theory. https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/ssllt/article/view/17399l2 motivationself-determination theoryl2 motivational self systeml2 proficiency
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Chika Takahashi
Seongah Im
spellingShingle Chika Takahashi
Seongah Im
Comparing self-determination theory and the L2 motivational self system and their relationships to L2 proficiency
Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching
l2 motivation
self-determination theory
l2 motivational self system
l2 proficiency
author_facet Chika Takahashi
Seongah Im
author_sort Chika Takahashi
title Comparing self-determination theory and the L2 motivational self system and their relationships to L2 proficiency
title_short Comparing self-determination theory and the L2 motivational self system and their relationships to L2 proficiency
title_full Comparing self-determination theory and the L2 motivational self system and their relationships to L2 proficiency
title_fullStr Comparing self-determination theory and the L2 motivational self system and their relationships to L2 proficiency
title_full_unstemmed Comparing self-determination theory and the L2 motivational self system and their relationships to L2 proficiency
title_sort comparing self-determination theory and the l2 motivational self system and their relationships to l2 proficiency
publisher Department of English Studies Faculty of Pedagogy and Fine Arts Adam Mickiewicz University
series Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching
issn 2083-5205
2084-1965
publishDate 2020-12-01
description This study empirically compares two often-utilized motivation theories in L2 studies: self-determination theory and the L2 motivational self system. It also examines the relationships among their motivational constructs, learners’ intended L2 learning effort, and L2 proficiency. While a number of studies have utilized these models in order to examine second language learners’ motivation, there has not been a thorough comparison of the two. Furthermore, while many studies have demonstrated the structural relationships between the motivational constructs of the two theories and the learner’s self-reported amount of effort, fewer studies have examined their L2 achievement. The results of this study indicated that the constituents in the two theories are correlated as predicted. Furthermore, while internalized types of motivation in self-determination theory predicted intended learning effort, which then led to L2 proficiency, the strength of the ideal L2 self was much weaker than the L2 learning experience, unlike what is argued in the theory.
topic l2 motivation
self-determination theory
l2 motivational self system
l2 proficiency
url https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/ssllt/article/view/17399
work_keys_str_mv AT chikatakahashi comparingselfdeterminationtheoryandthel2motivationalselfsystemandtheirrelationshipstol2proficiency
AT seongahim comparingselfdeterminationtheoryandthel2motivationalselfsystemandtheirrelationshipstol2proficiency
_version_ 1724364391243055104