Tuning the ultralow β^{*} optics at the KEK Accelerator Test Facility 2

For future linear colliders, a nanometer-scale beam size at the interaction point (IP) is one of the most challenging technical aspects. To explore the feasibility of a final focus system with a high chromaticity level, comparable to that of the Compact Linear Collider, the ultralow β^{*} optics has...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: R. Yang, A. Pastushenko, A. Aryshev, M. Bergamaschi, V. Cilento, A. Faus-Golfe, M. Fukuda, P. Korysko, K. Kubo, S. Kuroda, T. Naito, T. Okugi, F. Plassard, N. Terunuma, R. Tomás
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Physical Society 2020-07-01
Series:Physical Review Accelerators and Beams
Online Access:http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.23.071003
id doaj-f83621f4fd7d4a7a8b5ed3b325868f73
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f83621f4fd7d4a7a8b5ed3b325868f732020-11-25T03:05:52ZengAmerican Physical SocietyPhysical Review Accelerators and Beams2469-98882020-07-0123707100310.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.23.071003Tuning the ultralow β^{*} optics at the KEK Accelerator Test Facility 2R. YangA. PastushenkoA. AryshevM. BergamaschiV. CilentoA. Faus-GolfeM. FukudaP. KoryskoK. KuboS. KurodaT. NaitoT. OkugiF. PlassardN. TerunumaR. TomásFor future linear colliders, a nanometer-scale beam size at the interaction point (IP) is one of the most challenging technical aspects. To explore the feasibility of a final focus system with a high chromaticity level, comparable to that of the Compact Linear Collider, the ultralow β^{*} optics has been proposed and tuned at the KEK Accelerator Test Facility 2. In this paper, the recent experimental results are presented, which demonstrate the capability of achieving and stabilizing a vertical average beam size of 60 nm and below at the virtual IP. The observed vertical beam size is about 20 nm above the numerical predictions in the presence of static and dynamic imperfections. We interpret this discrepancy as beam size growth due to multipole fields, beam jitters and wakefield effects, and diagnostic errors.http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.23.071003
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author R. Yang
A. Pastushenko
A. Aryshev
M. Bergamaschi
V. Cilento
A. Faus-Golfe
M. Fukuda
P. Korysko
K. Kubo
S. Kuroda
T. Naito
T. Okugi
F. Plassard
N. Terunuma
R. Tomás
spellingShingle R. Yang
A. Pastushenko
A. Aryshev
M. Bergamaschi
V. Cilento
A. Faus-Golfe
M. Fukuda
P. Korysko
K. Kubo
S. Kuroda
T. Naito
T. Okugi
F. Plassard
N. Terunuma
R. Tomás
Tuning the ultralow β^{*} optics at the KEK Accelerator Test Facility 2
Physical Review Accelerators and Beams
author_facet R. Yang
A. Pastushenko
A. Aryshev
M. Bergamaschi
V. Cilento
A. Faus-Golfe
M. Fukuda
P. Korysko
K. Kubo
S. Kuroda
T. Naito
T. Okugi
F. Plassard
N. Terunuma
R. Tomás
author_sort R. Yang
title Tuning the ultralow β^{*} optics at the KEK Accelerator Test Facility 2
title_short Tuning the ultralow β^{*} optics at the KEK Accelerator Test Facility 2
title_full Tuning the ultralow β^{*} optics at the KEK Accelerator Test Facility 2
title_fullStr Tuning the ultralow β^{*} optics at the KEK Accelerator Test Facility 2
title_full_unstemmed Tuning the ultralow β^{*} optics at the KEK Accelerator Test Facility 2
title_sort tuning the ultralow β^{*} optics at the kek accelerator test facility 2
publisher American Physical Society
series Physical Review Accelerators and Beams
issn 2469-9888
publishDate 2020-07-01
description For future linear colliders, a nanometer-scale beam size at the interaction point (IP) is one of the most challenging technical aspects. To explore the feasibility of a final focus system with a high chromaticity level, comparable to that of the Compact Linear Collider, the ultralow β^{*} optics has been proposed and tuned at the KEK Accelerator Test Facility 2. In this paper, the recent experimental results are presented, which demonstrate the capability of achieving and stabilizing a vertical average beam size of 60 nm and below at the virtual IP. The observed vertical beam size is about 20 nm above the numerical predictions in the presence of static and dynamic imperfections. We interpret this discrepancy as beam size growth due to multipole fields, beam jitters and wakefield effects, and diagnostic errors.
url http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.23.071003
work_keys_str_mv AT ryang tuningtheultralowbopticsatthekekacceleratortestfacility2
AT apastushenko tuningtheultralowbopticsatthekekacceleratortestfacility2
AT aaryshev tuningtheultralowbopticsatthekekacceleratortestfacility2
AT mbergamaschi tuningtheultralowbopticsatthekekacceleratortestfacility2
AT vcilento tuningtheultralowbopticsatthekekacceleratortestfacility2
AT afausgolfe tuningtheultralowbopticsatthekekacceleratortestfacility2
AT mfukuda tuningtheultralowbopticsatthekekacceleratortestfacility2
AT pkorysko tuningtheultralowbopticsatthekekacceleratortestfacility2
AT kkubo tuningtheultralowbopticsatthekekacceleratortestfacility2
AT skuroda tuningtheultralowbopticsatthekekacceleratortestfacility2
AT tnaito tuningtheultralowbopticsatthekekacceleratortestfacility2
AT tokugi tuningtheultralowbopticsatthekekacceleratortestfacility2
AT fplassard tuningtheultralowbopticsatthekekacceleratortestfacility2
AT nterunuma tuningtheultralowbopticsatthekekacceleratortestfacility2
AT rtomas tuningtheultralowbopticsatthekekacceleratortestfacility2
_version_ 1724676829725327360