The efficiency and effectiveness of utilizing diagrams in interviews: an assessment of participatory diagramming and graphic elicitation

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>This paper focuses on measuring the efficiency and effectiveness of two diagramming methods employed in key informant interviews with clinicians and health care administrators. The two methods are 'participatory diagramming'...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ritvo Paul G, Lemieux-Charles Louise, Dobrow Mark J, Umoquit Muriah J, Urbach David R, Wodchis Walter P
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2008-08-01
Series:BMC Medical Research Methodology
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/8/53
id doaj-f83ecd5d59ca4ac6a10fd709f0ab6c54
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f83ecd5d59ca4ac6a10fd709f0ab6c542020-11-25T00:24:17ZengBMCBMC Medical Research Methodology1471-22882008-08-01815310.1186/1471-2288-8-53The efficiency and effectiveness of utilizing diagrams in interviews: an assessment of participatory diagramming and graphic elicitationRitvo Paul GLemieux-Charles LouiseDobrow Mark JUmoquit Muriah JUrbach David RWodchis Walter P<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>This paper focuses on measuring the efficiency and effectiveness of two diagramming methods employed in key informant interviews with clinicians and health care administrators. The two methods are 'participatory diagramming', where the respondent creates a diagram that assists in their communication of answers, and 'graphic elicitation', where a researcher-prepared diagram is used to stimulate data collection.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>These two diagramming methods were applied in key informant interviews and their value in efficiently and effectively gathering data was assessed based on quantitative measures and qualitative observations.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Assessment of the two diagramming methods suggests that participatory diagramming is an efficient method for collecting data in graphic form, but may not generate the depth of verbal response that many qualitative researchers seek. In contrast, graphic elicitation was more intuitive, better understood and preferred by most respondents, and often provided more contemplative verbal responses, however this was achieved at the expense of more interview time.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Diagramming methods are important for eliciting interview data that are often difficult to obtain through traditional verbal exchanges. Subject to the methodological limitations of the study, our findings suggest that while participatory diagramming and graphic elicitation have specific strengths and weaknesses, their combined use can provide complementary information that would not likely occur with the application of only one diagramming method. The methodological insights gained by examining the efficiency and effectiveness of these diagramming methods in our study should be helpful to other researchers considering their incorporation into qualitative research designs.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/8/53
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ritvo Paul G
Lemieux-Charles Louise
Dobrow Mark J
Umoquit Muriah J
Urbach David R
Wodchis Walter P
spellingShingle Ritvo Paul G
Lemieux-Charles Louise
Dobrow Mark J
Umoquit Muriah J
Urbach David R
Wodchis Walter P
The efficiency and effectiveness of utilizing diagrams in interviews: an assessment of participatory diagramming and graphic elicitation
BMC Medical Research Methodology
author_facet Ritvo Paul G
Lemieux-Charles Louise
Dobrow Mark J
Umoquit Muriah J
Urbach David R
Wodchis Walter P
author_sort Ritvo Paul G
title The efficiency and effectiveness of utilizing diagrams in interviews: an assessment of participatory diagramming and graphic elicitation
title_short The efficiency and effectiveness of utilizing diagrams in interviews: an assessment of participatory diagramming and graphic elicitation
title_full The efficiency and effectiveness of utilizing diagrams in interviews: an assessment of participatory diagramming and graphic elicitation
title_fullStr The efficiency and effectiveness of utilizing diagrams in interviews: an assessment of participatory diagramming and graphic elicitation
title_full_unstemmed The efficiency and effectiveness of utilizing diagrams in interviews: an assessment of participatory diagramming and graphic elicitation
title_sort efficiency and effectiveness of utilizing diagrams in interviews: an assessment of participatory diagramming and graphic elicitation
publisher BMC
series BMC Medical Research Methodology
issn 1471-2288
publishDate 2008-08-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>This paper focuses on measuring the efficiency and effectiveness of two diagramming methods employed in key informant interviews with clinicians and health care administrators. The two methods are 'participatory diagramming', where the respondent creates a diagram that assists in their communication of answers, and 'graphic elicitation', where a researcher-prepared diagram is used to stimulate data collection.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>These two diagramming methods were applied in key informant interviews and their value in efficiently and effectively gathering data was assessed based on quantitative measures and qualitative observations.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Assessment of the two diagramming methods suggests that participatory diagramming is an efficient method for collecting data in graphic form, but may not generate the depth of verbal response that many qualitative researchers seek. In contrast, graphic elicitation was more intuitive, better understood and preferred by most respondents, and often provided more contemplative verbal responses, however this was achieved at the expense of more interview time.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Diagramming methods are important for eliciting interview data that are often difficult to obtain through traditional verbal exchanges. Subject to the methodological limitations of the study, our findings suggest that while participatory diagramming and graphic elicitation have specific strengths and weaknesses, their combined use can provide complementary information that would not likely occur with the application of only one diagramming method. The methodological insights gained by examining the efficiency and effectiveness of these diagramming methods in our study should be helpful to other researchers considering their incorporation into qualitative research designs.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/8/53
work_keys_str_mv AT ritvopaulg theefficiencyandeffectivenessofutilizingdiagramsininterviewsanassessmentofparticipatorydiagrammingandgraphicelicitation
AT lemieuxcharleslouise theefficiencyandeffectivenessofutilizingdiagramsininterviewsanassessmentofparticipatorydiagrammingandgraphicelicitation
AT dobrowmarkj theefficiencyandeffectivenessofutilizingdiagramsininterviewsanassessmentofparticipatorydiagrammingandgraphicelicitation
AT umoquitmuriahj theefficiencyandeffectivenessofutilizingdiagramsininterviewsanassessmentofparticipatorydiagrammingandgraphicelicitation
AT urbachdavidr theefficiencyandeffectivenessofutilizingdiagramsininterviewsanassessmentofparticipatorydiagrammingandgraphicelicitation
AT wodchiswalterp theefficiencyandeffectivenessofutilizingdiagramsininterviewsanassessmentofparticipatorydiagrammingandgraphicelicitation
AT ritvopaulg efficiencyandeffectivenessofutilizingdiagramsininterviewsanassessmentofparticipatorydiagrammingandgraphicelicitation
AT lemieuxcharleslouise efficiencyandeffectivenessofutilizingdiagramsininterviewsanassessmentofparticipatorydiagrammingandgraphicelicitation
AT dobrowmarkj efficiencyandeffectivenessofutilizingdiagramsininterviewsanassessmentofparticipatorydiagrammingandgraphicelicitation
AT umoquitmuriahj efficiencyandeffectivenessofutilizingdiagramsininterviewsanassessmentofparticipatorydiagrammingandgraphicelicitation
AT urbachdavidr efficiencyandeffectivenessofutilizingdiagramsininterviewsanassessmentofparticipatorydiagrammingandgraphicelicitation
AT wodchiswalterp efficiencyandeffectivenessofutilizingdiagramsininterviewsanassessmentofparticipatorydiagrammingandgraphicelicitation
_version_ 1725352896373981184