Assessing respiratory pathogen communities in bighorn sheep populations: Sampling realities, challenges, and improvements.

Respiratory disease has been a persistent problem for the recovery of bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis), but has uncertain etiology. The disease has been attributed to several bacterial pathogens including Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae and Pasteurellaceae pathogens belonging to the Mannheimia, Bibersteinia...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carson J Butler, William H Edwards, Jessica E Jennings-Gaines, Halcyon J Killion, Mary E Wood, Douglas E McWhirter, J Terrill Paterson, Kelly M Proffitt, Emily S Almberg, P J White, Jay J Rotella, Robert A Garrott
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2017-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5510838?pdf=render
id doaj-f8439af4e8554df3aacdbfbd2ef54478
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f8439af4e8554df3aacdbfbd2ef544782020-11-25T01:31:48ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-01127e018068910.1371/journal.pone.0180689Assessing respiratory pathogen communities in bighorn sheep populations: Sampling realities, challenges, and improvements.Carson J ButlerWilliam H EdwardsJessica E Jennings-GainesHalcyon J KillionMary E WoodDouglas E McWhirterJ Terrill PatersonKelly M ProffittEmily S AlmbergP J WhiteJay J RotellaRobert A GarrottRespiratory disease has been a persistent problem for the recovery of bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis), but has uncertain etiology. The disease has been attributed to several bacterial pathogens including Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae and Pasteurellaceae pathogens belonging to the Mannheimia, Bibersteinia, and Pasteurella genera. We estimated detection probability for these pathogens using protocols with diagnostic tests offered by a fee-for-service laboratory and not offered by a fee-for-service laboratory. We conducted 2861 diagnostic tests on swab samples collected from 476 bighorn sheep captured across Montana and Wyoming to gain inferences regarding detection probability, pathogen prevalence, and the power of different sampling methodologies to detect pathogens in bighorn sheep populations. Estimated detection probability using fee-for-service protocols was less than 0.50 for all Pasteurellaceae and 0.73 for Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae. Non-fee-for-service Pasteurellaceae protocols had higher detection probabilities, but no single protocol increased detection probability of all Pasteurellaceae pathogens to greater than 0.50. At least one protocol resulted in an estimated detection probability of 0.80 for each pathogen except Mannheimia haemolytica, for which the highest detection probability was 0.45. In general, the power to detect Pasteurellaceae pathogens at low prevalence in populations was low unless many animals were sampled or replicate samples were collected per animal. Imperfect detection also resulted in low precision when estimating prevalence for any pathogen. Low and variable detection probabilities for respiratory pathogens using live-sampling protocols may lead to inaccurate conclusions regarding pathogen community dynamics and causes of bighorn sheep respiratory disease epizootics. We recommend that agencies collect multiples samples per animal for Pasteurellaceae detection, and one sample for Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae detection from at least 30 individuals to reliably detect both Pasteurellaceae and Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae at the population-level. Availability of PCR diagnostic tests to wildlife management agencies would improve the ability to reliably detect Pasteurellaceae in bighorn sheep populations.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5510838?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Carson J Butler
William H Edwards
Jessica E Jennings-Gaines
Halcyon J Killion
Mary E Wood
Douglas E McWhirter
J Terrill Paterson
Kelly M Proffitt
Emily S Almberg
P J White
Jay J Rotella
Robert A Garrott
spellingShingle Carson J Butler
William H Edwards
Jessica E Jennings-Gaines
Halcyon J Killion
Mary E Wood
Douglas E McWhirter
J Terrill Paterson
Kelly M Proffitt
Emily S Almberg
P J White
Jay J Rotella
Robert A Garrott
Assessing respiratory pathogen communities in bighorn sheep populations: Sampling realities, challenges, and improvements.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Carson J Butler
William H Edwards
Jessica E Jennings-Gaines
Halcyon J Killion
Mary E Wood
Douglas E McWhirter
J Terrill Paterson
Kelly M Proffitt
Emily S Almberg
P J White
Jay J Rotella
Robert A Garrott
author_sort Carson J Butler
title Assessing respiratory pathogen communities in bighorn sheep populations: Sampling realities, challenges, and improvements.
title_short Assessing respiratory pathogen communities in bighorn sheep populations: Sampling realities, challenges, and improvements.
title_full Assessing respiratory pathogen communities in bighorn sheep populations: Sampling realities, challenges, and improvements.
title_fullStr Assessing respiratory pathogen communities in bighorn sheep populations: Sampling realities, challenges, and improvements.
title_full_unstemmed Assessing respiratory pathogen communities in bighorn sheep populations: Sampling realities, challenges, and improvements.
title_sort assessing respiratory pathogen communities in bighorn sheep populations: sampling realities, challenges, and improvements.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Respiratory disease has been a persistent problem for the recovery of bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis), but has uncertain etiology. The disease has been attributed to several bacterial pathogens including Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae and Pasteurellaceae pathogens belonging to the Mannheimia, Bibersteinia, and Pasteurella genera. We estimated detection probability for these pathogens using protocols with diagnostic tests offered by a fee-for-service laboratory and not offered by a fee-for-service laboratory. We conducted 2861 diagnostic tests on swab samples collected from 476 bighorn sheep captured across Montana and Wyoming to gain inferences regarding detection probability, pathogen prevalence, and the power of different sampling methodologies to detect pathogens in bighorn sheep populations. Estimated detection probability using fee-for-service protocols was less than 0.50 for all Pasteurellaceae and 0.73 for Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae. Non-fee-for-service Pasteurellaceae protocols had higher detection probabilities, but no single protocol increased detection probability of all Pasteurellaceae pathogens to greater than 0.50. At least one protocol resulted in an estimated detection probability of 0.80 for each pathogen except Mannheimia haemolytica, for which the highest detection probability was 0.45. In general, the power to detect Pasteurellaceae pathogens at low prevalence in populations was low unless many animals were sampled or replicate samples were collected per animal. Imperfect detection also resulted in low precision when estimating prevalence for any pathogen. Low and variable detection probabilities for respiratory pathogens using live-sampling protocols may lead to inaccurate conclusions regarding pathogen community dynamics and causes of bighorn sheep respiratory disease epizootics. We recommend that agencies collect multiples samples per animal for Pasteurellaceae detection, and one sample for Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae detection from at least 30 individuals to reliably detect both Pasteurellaceae and Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae at the population-level. Availability of PCR diagnostic tests to wildlife management agencies would improve the ability to reliably detect Pasteurellaceae in bighorn sheep populations.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5510838?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT carsonjbutler assessingrespiratorypathogencommunitiesinbighornsheeppopulationssamplingrealitieschallengesandimprovements
AT williamhedwards assessingrespiratorypathogencommunitiesinbighornsheeppopulationssamplingrealitieschallengesandimprovements
AT jessicaejenningsgaines assessingrespiratorypathogencommunitiesinbighornsheeppopulationssamplingrealitieschallengesandimprovements
AT halcyonjkillion assessingrespiratorypathogencommunitiesinbighornsheeppopulationssamplingrealitieschallengesandimprovements
AT maryewood assessingrespiratorypathogencommunitiesinbighornsheeppopulationssamplingrealitieschallengesandimprovements
AT douglasemcwhirter assessingrespiratorypathogencommunitiesinbighornsheeppopulationssamplingrealitieschallengesandimprovements
AT jterrillpaterson assessingrespiratorypathogencommunitiesinbighornsheeppopulationssamplingrealitieschallengesandimprovements
AT kellymproffitt assessingrespiratorypathogencommunitiesinbighornsheeppopulationssamplingrealitieschallengesandimprovements
AT emilysalmberg assessingrespiratorypathogencommunitiesinbighornsheeppopulationssamplingrealitieschallengesandimprovements
AT pjwhite assessingrespiratorypathogencommunitiesinbighornsheeppopulationssamplingrealitieschallengesandimprovements
AT jayjrotella assessingrespiratorypathogencommunitiesinbighornsheeppopulationssamplingrealitieschallengesandimprovements
AT robertagarrott assessingrespiratorypathogencommunitiesinbighornsheeppopulationssamplingrealitieschallengesandimprovements
_version_ 1725085231659089920