Rapid quantification of plant-powdery mildew interactions by qPCR and conidiospore counts
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The powdery mildew disease represents a valuable patho-system to study the interaction between plant hosts and obligate biotrophic fungal pathogens. Numerous discoveries have been made on the basis of the quantitative evaluation of p...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2012-08-01
|
Series: | Plant Methods |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.plantmethods.com/content/8/1/35 |
id |
doaj-f84d66e0deab43f3ad6f9b68ec5a98dd |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f84d66e0deab43f3ad6f9b68ec5a98dd2020-11-24T21:41:21ZengBMCPlant Methods1746-48112012-08-01813510.1186/1746-4811-8-35Rapid quantification of plant-powdery mildew interactions by qPCR and conidiospore countsWeßling RalfPanstruga Ralph<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The powdery mildew disease represents a valuable patho-system to study the interaction between plant hosts and obligate biotrophic fungal pathogens. Numerous discoveries have been made on the basis of the quantitative evaluation of plant-powdery mildew interactions, especially in the context of hyper-susceptible and/or resistant plant mutants. However, the presently available methods to score the pathogenic success of powdery mildew fungi are laborious and thus not well suited for medium- to high-throughput analysis.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Here we present two new protocols that allow the rapid quantitative assessment of powdery mildew disease development. One procedure depends on quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)-based evaluation of fungal biomass, while the other relies on the quantification of fungal conidiospores. We validated both techniques using the powdery mildew pathogen <it>Golovinomyces orontii</it> on a set of hyper-susceptible and resistant <it>Arabidopsis thaliana</it> mutants and found that both cover a wide dynamic range of one to two (qPCR) and four to five (quantification of conidia) orders of magnitude, respectively. The two approaches yield reproducible results and are easy to perform without specialized equipment.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The qPCR and spore count assays rapidly and reproducibly quantify powdery mildew pathogenesis. Our methods are performed at later stages of infection and discern mutant phenotypes accurately. The assays therefore complement currently used procedures of powdery mildew quantification and can overcome some of their limitations. In addition, they can easily be adapted to other plant-powdery mildew patho-systems.</p> http://www.plantmethods.com/content/8/1/35<it>Arabidopsis thaliana</it>Conidiospores<it>Golovinomyces orontii</it>Powdery mildewQuantificationqPCR |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Weßling Ralf Panstruga Ralph |
spellingShingle |
Weßling Ralf Panstruga Ralph Rapid quantification of plant-powdery mildew interactions by qPCR and conidiospore counts Plant Methods <it>Arabidopsis thaliana</it> Conidiospores <it>Golovinomyces orontii</it> Powdery mildew Quantification qPCR |
author_facet |
Weßling Ralf Panstruga Ralph |
author_sort |
Weßling Ralf |
title |
Rapid quantification of plant-powdery mildew interactions by qPCR and conidiospore counts |
title_short |
Rapid quantification of plant-powdery mildew interactions by qPCR and conidiospore counts |
title_full |
Rapid quantification of plant-powdery mildew interactions by qPCR and conidiospore counts |
title_fullStr |
Rapid quantification of plant-powdery mildew interactions by qPCR and conidiospore counts |
title_full_unstemmed |
Rapid quantification of plant-powdery mildew interactions by qPCR and conidiospore counts |
title_sort |
rapid quantification of plant-powdery mildew interactions by qpcr and conidiospore counts |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Plant Methods |
issn |
1746-4811 |
publishDate |
2012-08-01 |
description |
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The powdery mildew disease represents a valuable patho-system to study the interaction between plant hosts and obligate biotrophic fungal pathogens. Numerous discoveries have been made on the basis of the quantitative evaluation of plant-powdery mildew interactions, especially in the context of hyper-susceptible and/or resistant plant mutants. However, the presently available methods to score the pathogenic success of powdery mildew fungi are laborious and thus not well suited for medium- to high-throughput analysis.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Here we present two new protocols that allow the rapid quantitative assessment of powdery mildew disease development. One procedure depends on quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)-based evaluation of fungal biomass, while the other relies on the quantification of fungal conidiospores. We validated both techniques using the powdery mildew pathogen <it>Golovinomyces orontii</it> on a set of hyper-susceptible and resistant <it>Arabidopsis thaliana</it> mutants and found that both cover a wide dynamic range of one to two (qPCR) and four to five (quantification of conidia) orders of magnitude, respectively. The two approaches yield reproducible results and are easy to perform without specialized equipment.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The qPCR and spore count assays rapidly and reproducibly quantify powdery mildew pathogenesis. Our methods are performed at later stages of infection and discern mutant phenotypes accurately. The assays therefore complement currently used procedures of powdery mildew quantification and can overcome some of their limitations. In addition, they can easily be adapted to other plant-powdery mildew patho-systems.</p> |
topic |
<it>Arabidopsis thaliana</it> Conidiospores <it>Golovinomyces orontii</it> Powdery mildew Quantification qPCR |
url |
http://www.plantmethods.com/content/8/1/35 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT weßlingralf rapidquantificationofplantpowderymildewinteractionsbyqpcrandconidiosporecounts AT panstrugaralph rapidquantificationofplantpowderymildewinteractionsbyqpcrandconidiosporecounts |
_version_ |
1725922472083062784 |