Macular Hole Surgery in a Patient Who Cannot Maintain Facedown Positioning

Aim: To present macular hole surgery in a patient who had previously undergone thyroid removal surgery. Material and Methods: During thyroid gland removal surgery, the recurrent laryngeal nerves were cut by the surgeon. Therefore, the patient had to have a tracheotomy and because of this unusual sit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zofia Michalewska, Jerzy Nawrocki
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Karger Publishers 2013-01-01
Series:Case Reports in Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/343701
id doaj-f8e9372555364057950d66c900cb58d8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f8e9372555364057950d66c900cb58d82020-11-24T21:05:18ZengKarger PublishersCase Reports in Ophthalmology1663-26992013-01-01411610.1159/000343701343701Macular Hole Surgery in a Patient Who Cannot Maintain Facedown PositioningZofia MichalewskaJerzy NawrockiAim: To present macular hole surgery in a patient who had previously undergone thyroid removal surgery. Material and Methods: During thyroid gland removal surgery, the recurrent laryngeal nerves were cut by the surgeon. Therefore, the patient had to have a tracheotomy and because of this unusual situation, the patient could not breathe if lying ‘upside-down’. Complete ophthalmic examination and spectral optical coherence tomography was performed in a 77-year-old woman before and after macular hole surgery. Results: The patient was treated by the ‘inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique’ with air tamponade for macular hole closure. This technique was described to have very high success rates in large, stage IV macular holes. Postoperatively, lying on her opposite side was advised. However, the macular hole remained open after this approach. Because of this, another approach was undertaken. The ILM flap technique and silicone oil were applied, and the patient was positioned on her opposite side. Silicone oil was removed after 3 months. Eighteen months later, the macular hole remained closed. Visual acuity improved from 10/200 to 20/50. Conclusion: This case demonstrates that in an extremely select group of patients, silicone oil combined with the inverted flap technique may be considered for treatment of macular hole.http://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/343701Macular holeInverted ILM flapSD-OCT
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Zofia Michalewska
Jerzy Nawrocki
spellingShingle Zofia Michalewska
Jerzy Nawrocki
Macular Hole Surgery in a Patient Who Cannot Maintain Facedown Positioning
Case Reports in Ophthalmology
Macular hole
Inverted ILM flap
SD-OCT
author_facet Zofia Michalewska
Jerzy Nawrocki
author_sort Zofia Michalewska
title Macular Hole Surgery in a Patient Who Cannot Maintain Facedown Positioning
title_short Macular Hole Surgery in a Patient Who Cannot Maintain Facedown Positioning
title_full Macular Hole Surgery in a Patient Who Cannot Maintain Facedown Positioning
title_fullStr Macular Hole Surgery in a Patient Who Cannot Maintain Facedown Positioning
title_full_unstemmed Macular Hole Surgery in a Patient Who Cannot Maintain Facedown Positioning
title_sort macular hole surgery in a patient who cannot maintain facedown positioning
publisher Karger Publishers
series Case Reports in Ophthalmology
issn 1663-2699
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Aim: To present macular hole surgery in a patient who had previously undergone thyroid removal surgery. Material and Methods: During thyroid gland removal surgery, the recurrent laryngeal nerves were cut by the surgeon. Therefore, the patient had to have a tracheotomy and because of this unusual situation, the patient could not breathe if lying ‘upside-down’. Complete ophthalmic examination and spectral optical coherence tomography was performed in a 77-year-old woman before and after macular hole surgery. Results: The patient was treated by the ‘inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique’ with air tamponade for macular hole closure. This technique was described to have very high success rates in large, stage IV macular holes. Postoperatively, lying on her opposite side was advised. However, the macular hole remained open after this approach. Because of this, another approach was undertaken. The ILM flap technique and silicone oil were applied, and the patient was positioned on her opposite side. Silicone oil was removed after 3 months. Eighteen months later, the macular hole remained closed. Visual acuity improved from 10/200 to 20/50. Conclusion: This case demonstrates that in an extremely select group of patients, silicone oil combined with the inverted flap technique may be considered for treatment of macular hole.
topic Macular hole
Inverted ILM flap
SD-OCT
url http://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/343701
work_keys_str_mv AT zofiamichalewska macularholesurgeryinapatientwhocannotmaintainfacedownpositioning
AT jerzynawrocki macularholesurgeryinapatientwhocannotmaintainfacedownpositioning
_version_ 1716769181575151616