The traveling heads 2.0: Multicenter reproducibility of quantitative imaging methods at 7 Tesla

Object: This study evaluates inter-site and intra-site reproducibility at ten different 7 T sites for quantitative brain imaging. Material and Methods: Two subjects – termed the “traveling heads” – were imaged at ten different 7 T sites with a harmonized quantitative brain MR imaging protocol. In co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maximilian N. Voelker, Oliver Kraff, Steffen Goerke, Frederik B. Laun, Jannis Hanspach, Kerrin J. Pine, Philipp Ehses, Moritz Zaiss, Andrzej Liebert, Sina Straub, Korbinian Eckstein, Simon Robinson, Armin N. Nagel, Maria R. Stefanescu, Astrid Wollrab, Sabrina Klix, Jörg Felder, Michael Hock, Dario Bosch, Nikolaus Weiskopf, Oliver Speck, Mark E. Ladd, Harald H. Quick
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-05-01
Series:NeuroImage
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811921001877
id doaj-f93edf3e26ca4e72b5d2a39970ee20ea
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Maximilian N. Voelker
Oliver Kraff
Steffen Goerke
Frederik B. Laun
Jannis Hanspach
Kerrin J. Pine
Philipp Ehses
Moritz Zaiss
Andrzej Liebert
Sina Straub
Korbinian Eckstein
Simon Robinson
Armin N. Nagel
Maria R. Stefanescu
Astrid Wollrab
Sabrina Klix
Jörg Felder
Michael Hock
Dario Bosch
Nikolaus Weiskopf
Oliver Speck
Mark E. Ladd
Harald H. Quick
spellingShingle Maximilian N. Voelker
Oliver Kraff
Steffen Goerke
Frederik B. Laun
Jannis Hanspach
Kerrin J. Pine
Philipp Ehses
Moritz Zaiss
Andrzej Liebert
Sina Straub
Korbinian Eckstein
Simon Robinson
Armin N. Nagel
Maria R. Stefanescu
Astrid Wollrab
Sabrina Klix
Jörg Felder
Michael Hock
Dario Bosch
Nikolaus Weiskopf
Oliver Speck
Mark E. Ladd
Harald H. Quick
The traveling heads 2.0: Multicenter reproducibility of quantitative imaging methods at 7 Tesla
NeuroImage
Magnetic resonance imaging
Ultrahigh field
Multicenter
Reproducibility
Quantitative imaging
author_facet Maximilian N. Voelker
Oliver Kraff
Steffen Goerke
Frederik B. Laun
Jannis Hanspach
Kerrin J. Pine
Philipp Ehses
Moritz Zaiss
Andrzej Liebert
Sina Straub
Korbinian Eckstein
Simon Robinson
Armin N. Nagel
Maria R. Stefanescu
Astrid Wollrab
Sabrina Klix
Jörg Felder
Michael Hock
Dario Bosch
Nikolaus Weiskopf
Oliver Speck
Mark E. Ladd
Harald H. Quick
author_sort Maximilian N. Voelker
title The traveling heads 2.0: Multicenter reproducibility of quantitative imaging methods at 7 Tesla
title_short The traveling heads 2.0: Multicenter reproducibility of quantitative imaging methods at 7 Tesla
title_full The traveling heads 2.0: Multicenter reproducibility of quantitative imaging methods at 7 Tesla
title_fullStr The traveling heads 2.0: Multicenter reproducibility of quantitative imaging methods at 7 Tesla
title_full_unstemmed The traveling heads 2.0: Multicenter reproducibility of quantitative imaging methods at 7 Tesla
title_sort traveling heads 2.0: multicenter reproducibility of quantitative imaging methods at 7 tesla
publisher Elsevier
series NeuroImage
issn 1095-9572
publishDate 2021-05-01
description Object: This study evaluates inter-site and intra-site reproducibility at ten different 7 T sites for quantitative brain imaging. Material and Methods: Two subjects – termed the “traveling heads” – were imaged at ten different 7 T sites with a harmonized quantitative brain MR imaging protocol. In conjunction with the system calibration, MP2RAGE, QSM, CEST and multi-parametric mapping/relaxometry were examined. Results: Quantitative measurements with MP2RAGE showed very high reproducibility across sites and subjects, and errors were in concordance with previous results and other field strengths. QSM had high inter-site reproducibility for relevant subcortical volumes. CEST imaging revealed systematic differences between the sites, but reproducibility was comparable to results in the literature. Relaxometry had also very high agreement between sites, but due to the high sensitivity, differences caused by different applications of the B1 calibration of the two RF coil types used were observed. Conclusion: Our results show that quantitative brain imaging can be performed with high reproducibility at 7 T and with similar reliability as found at 3 T for multicenter studies of the supratentorial brain.
topic Magnetic resonance imaging
Ultrahigh field
Multicenter
Reproducibility
Quantitative imaging
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811921001877
work_keys_str_mv AT maximiliannvoelker thetravelingheads20multicenterreproducibilityofquantitativeimagingmethodsat7tesla
AT oliverkraff thetravelingheads20multicenterreproducibilityofquantitativeimagingmethodsat7tesla
AT steffengoerke thetravelingheads20multicenterreproducibilityofquantitativeimagingmethodsat7tesla
AT frederikblaun thetravelingheads20multicenterreproducibilityofquantitativeimagingmethodsat7tesla
AT jannishanspach thetravelingheads20multicenterreproducibilityofquantitativeimagingmethodsat7tesla
AT kerrinjpine thetravelingheads20multicenterreproducibilityofquantitativeimagingmethodsat7tesla
AT philippehses thetravelingheads20multicenterreproducibilityofquantitativeimagingmethodsat7tesla
AT moritzzaiss thetravelingheads20multicenterreproducibilityofquantitativeimagingmethodsat7tesla
AT andrzejliebert thetravelingheads20multicenterreproducibilityofquantitativeimagingmethodsat7tesla
AT sinastraub thetravelingheads20multicenterreproducibilityofquantitativeimagingmethodsat7tesla
AT korbinianeckstein thetravelingheads20multicenterreproducibilityofquantitativeimagingmethodsat7tesla
AT simonrobinson thetravelingheads20multicenterreproducibilityofquantitativeimagingmethodsat7tesla
AT arminnnagel thetravelingheads20multicenterreproducibilityofquantitativeimagingmethodsat7tesla
AT mariarstefanescu thetravelingheads20multicenterreproducibilityofquantitativeimagingmethodsat7tesla
AT astridwollrab thetravelingheads20multicenterreproducibilityofquantitativeimagingmethodsat7tesla
AT sabrinaklix thetravelingheads20multicenterreproducibilityofquantitativeimagingmethodsat7tesla
AT jorgfelder thetravelingheads20multicenterreproducibilityofquantitativeimagingmethodsat7tesla
AT michaelhock thetravelingheads20multicenterreproducibilityofquantitativeimagingmethodsat7tesla
AT dariobosch thetravelingheads20multicenterreproducibilityofquantitativeimagingmethodsat7tesla
AT nikolausweiskopf thetravelingheads20multicenterreproducibilityofquantitativeimagingmethodsat7tesla
AT oliverspeck thetravelingheads20multicenterreproducibilityofquantitativeimagingmethodsat7tesla
AT markeladd thetravelingheads20multicenterreproducibilityofquantitativeimagingmethodsat7tesla
AT haraldhquick thetravelingheads20multicenterreproducibilityofquantitativeimagingmethodsat7tesla
AT maximiliannvoelker travelingheads20multicenterreproducibilityofquantitativeimagingmethodsat7tesla
AT oliverkraff travelingheads20multicenterreproducibilityofquantitativeimagingmethodsat7tesla
AT steffengoerke travelingheads20multicenterreproducibilityofquantitativeimagingmethodsat7tesla
AT frederikblaun travelingheads20multicenterreproducibilityofquantitativeimagingmethodsat7tesla
AT jannishanspach travelingheads20multicenterreproducibilityofquantitativeimagingmethodsat7tesla
AT kerrinjpine travelingheads20multicenterreproducibilityofquantitativeimagingmethodsat7tesla
AT philippehses travelingheads20multicenterreproducibilityofquantitativeimagingmethodsat7tesla
AT moritzzaiss travelingheads20multicenterreproducibilityofquantitativeimagingmethodsat7tesla
AT andrzejliebert travelingheads20multicenterreproducibilityofquantitativeimagingmethodsat7tesla
AT sinastraub travelingheads20multicenterreproducibilityofquantitativeimagingmethodsat7tesla
AT korbinianeckstein travelingheads20multicenterreproducibilityofquantitativeimagingmethodsat7tesla
AT simonrobinson travelingheads20multicenterreproducibilityofquantitativeimagingmethodsat7tesla
AT arminnnagel travelingheads20multicenterreproducibilityofquantitativeimagingmethodsat7tesla
AT mariarstefanescu travelingheads20multicenterreproducibilityofquantitativeimagingmethodsat7tesla
AT astridwollrab travelingheads20multicenterreproducibilityofquantitativeimagingmethodsat7tesla
AT sabrinaklix travelingheads20multicenterreproducibilityofquantitativeimagingmethodsat7tesla
AT jorgfelder travelingheads20multicenterreproducibilityofquantitativeimagingmethodsat7tesla
AT michaelhock travelingheads20multicenterreproducibilityofquantitativeimagingmethodsat7tesla
AT dariobosch travelingheads20multicenterreproducibilityofquantitativeimagingmethodsat7tesla
AT nikolausweiskopf travelingheads20multicenterreproducibilityofquantitativeimagingmethodsat7tesla
AT oliverspeck travelingheads20multicenterreproducibilityofquantitativeimagingmethodsat7tesla
AT markeladd travelingheads20multicenterreproducibilityofquantitativeimagingmethodsat7tesla
AT haraldhquick travelingheads20multicenterreproducibilityofquantitativeimagingmethodsat7tesla
_version_ 1721530426696138752
spelling doaj-f93edf3e26ca4e72b5d2a39970ee20ea2021-04-12T04:21:39ZengElsevierNeuroImage1095-95722021-05-01232117910The traveling heads 2.0: Multicenter reproducibility of quantitative imaging methods at 7 TeslaMaximilian N. Voelker0Oliver Kraff1Steffen Goerke2Frederik B. Laun3Jannis Hanspach4Kerrin J. Pine5Philipp Ehses6Moritz Zaiss7Andrzej Liebert8Sina Straub9Korbinian Eckstein10Simon Robinson11Armin N. Nagel12Maria R. Stefanescu13Astrid Wollrab14Sabrina Klix15Jörg Felder16Michael Hock17Dario Bosch18Nikolaus Weiskopf19Oliver Speck20Mark E. Ladd21Harald H. Quick22Erwin L. Hahn Institute for Magnetic Resonance Imaging, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany; High-Field and Hybrid MR Imaging, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany; Corresponding author at: Erwin L. Hahn Institute for Magnetic Resonance Imaging, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, GermanyErwin L. Hahn Institute for Magnetic Resonance Imaging, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, GermanyDivision of Medical Physics in Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, GermanyInstitute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, GermanyInstitute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, GermanyDepartment of Neurophysics, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, GermanyGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, GermanyInstitute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany; Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, GermanyInstitute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, GermanyDivision of Medical Physics in Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, GermanyHigh Field MR Center, Department for Biomedical Imaging and Image guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, AustriaHigh Field MR Center, Department for Biomedical Imaging and Image guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, AustriaInstitute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, GermanyChair of Cellular and Molecular Imaging, Comprehensive Heart Failure Center (CHFC), University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, GermanyOtto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, GermanyBerlin Ultrahigh Field Facility (B.U.F.F.), Max-Delbrueck-Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin-Buch, GermanyInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-4), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, GermanyChair of Cellular and Molecular Imaging, Comprehensive Heart Failure Center (CHFC), University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, GermanyMax Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, GermanyDepartment of Neurophysics, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany; Felix Bloch Institute for Solid State Physics, Faculty of Physics and Earth Sciences, Leipzig University, Leipzig, GermanyOtto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany; Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology, Magdeburg, GermanyErwin L. Hahn Institute for Magnetic Resonance Imaging, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany; Division of Medical Physics in Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and Faculty of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, GermanyErwin L. Hahn Institute for Magnetic Resonance Imaging, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany; High-Field and Hybrid MR Imaging, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, GermanyObject: This study evaluates inter-site and intra-site reproducibility at ten different 7 T sites for quantitative brain imaging. Material and Methods: Two subjects – termed the “traveling heads” – were imaged at ten different 7 T sites with a harmonized quantitative brain MR imaging protocol. In conjunction with the system calibration, MP2RAGE, QSM, CEST and multi-parametric mapping/relaxometry were examined. Results: Quantitative measurements with MP2RAGE showed very high reproducibility across sites and subjects, and errors were in concordance with previous results and other field strengths. QSM had high inter-site reproducibility for relevant subcortical volumes. CEST imaging revealed systematic differences between the sites, but reproducibility was comparable to results in the literature. Relaxometry had also very high agreement between sites, but due to the high sensitivity, differences caused by different applications of the B1 calibration of the two RF coil types used were observed. Conclusion: Our results show that quantitative brain imaging can be performed with high reproducibility at 7 T and with similar reliability as found at 3 T for multicenter studies of the supratentorial brain.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811921001877Magnetic resonance imagingUltrahigh fieldMulticenterReproducibilityQuantitative imaging