Susceptibility of wild and colonized Anopheles stephensi to Plasmodium vivax infection
Abstract Background As much as 80% of global Plasmodium vivax infections occur in South Asia and there is a shortage of direct studies on infectivity of P. vivax in Anopheles stephensi, the most common urban mosquito carrying human malaria. In this quest, the possible effects of laboratory colonizat...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2018-06-01
|
Series: | Malaria Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12936-018-2343-0 |
id |
doaj-f9a3be157cac4922809e1cc738024113 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f9a3be157cac4922809e1cc7380241132020-11-25T00:12:29ZengBMCMalaria Journal1475-28752018-06-0117111010.1186/s12936-018-2343-0Susceptibility of wild and colonized Anopheles stephensi to Plasmodium vivax infectionAjeet Kumar Mohanty0Praveen Balabaskaran Nina1Shuvankar Ballav2Smita Vernekar3Sushma Parkar4Maria D’souza5Wenyun Zuo6Edwin Gomes7Laura Chery8Shripad Tuljapurkar9Neena Valecha10Pradipsinh K. Rathod11Ashwani Kumar12National Institute of Malaria Research, Field UnitDepartments of Chemistry and Global Health, University of WashingtonNational Institute of Malaria Research, Field UnitNational Institute of Malaria Research, Field UnitNational Institute of Malaria Research, Field UnitNational Institute of Malaria Research, Field UnitDepartment of Biology, Stanford UniversityGoa Medical College and HospitalDepartments of Chemistry and Global Health, University of WashingtonDepartment of Biology, Stanford UniversityNational Institute of Malaria Research (ICMR)Departments of Chemistry and Global Health, University of WashingtonNational Institute of Malaria Research, Field UnitAbstract Background As much as 80% of global Plasmodium vivax infections occur in South Asia and there is a shortage of direct studies on infectivity of P. vivax in Anopheles stephensi, the most common urban mosquito carrying human malaria. In this quest, the possible effects of laboratory colonization of mosquitoes on infectivity and development of P. vivax is of interest given that colonized mosquitoes can be genetically less divergent than the field population from which they originated. Methods Patient-derived P. vivax infected blood was fed to age-matched wild and colonized An. stephensi. Such a comparison requires coordinated availability of same-age wild and colonized mosquito populations. Here, P. vivax infection are studied in colonized An. stephensi in their 66th–86th generation and fresh field-caught An. stephensi. Wild mosquitoes were caught as larvae and pupae and allowed to develop into adult mosquitoes in the insectary. Parasite development to oocyst and sporozoite stages were assessed on days 7/8 and 12/13, respectively. Results While there were batch to batch variations in infectivity of individual patient-derived P. vivax samples, both wild and colonized An. stephensi were roughly equally susceptible to oocyst stage Plasmodium infection. At the level of sporozoite development, significantly more mosquitoes with sporozoite load of 4+ were seen in wild than in colonized populations. Conclusions Overall at the level of oocyst development, significant difference was found between the colonized and wild Anopheles stephensi in their susceptibility to P. vivax. For initial understanding of infections with local strains of P. vivax, colonized Anopheles stephensi will serve as a good model. For experiments, where high number of sporozoites are necessary, wild mosquitoes provide distinct advantage over the colonized vector populations. Understanding the molecular mechanism modulating this variability between these two populations will be prime area of focus in future studies.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12936-018-2343-0Plasmodium vivaxAnopheles stephensiOocystsSporozoitesWild populationsColonized populations |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ajeet Kumar Mohanty Praveen Balabaskaran Nina Shuvankar Ballav Smita Vernekar Sushma Parkar Maria D’souza Wenyun Zuo Edwin Gomes Laura Chery Shripad Tuljapurkar Neena Valecha Pradipsinh K. Rathod Ashwani Kumar |
spellingShingle |
Ajeet Kumar Mohanty Praveen Balabaskaran Nina Shuvankar Ballav Smita Vernekar Sushma Parkar Maria D’souza Wenyun Zuo Edwin Gomes Laura Chery Shripad Tuljapurkar Neena Valecha Pradipsinh K. Rathod Ashwani Kumar Susceptibility of wild and colonized Anopheles stephensi to Plasmodium vivax infection Malaria Journal Plasmodium vivax Anopheles stephensi Oocysts Sporozoites Wild populations Colonized populations |
author_facet |
Ajeet Kumar Mohanty Praveen Balabaskaran Nina Shuvankar Ballav Smita Vernekar Sushma Parkar Maria D’souza Wenyun Zuo Edwin Gomes Laura Chery Shripad Tuljapurkar Neena Valecha Pradipsinh K. Rathod Ashwani Kumar |
author_sort |
Ajeet Kumar Mohanty |
title |
Susceptibility of wild and colonized Anopheles stephensi to Plasmodium vivax infection |
title_short |
Susceptibility of wild and colonized Anopheles stephensi to Plasmodium vivax infection |
title_full |
Susceptibility of wild and colonized Anopheles stephensi to Plasmodium vivax infection |
title_fullStr |
Susceptibility of wild and colonized Anopheles stephensi to Plasmodium vivax infection |
title_full_unstemmed |
Susceptibility of wild and colonized Anopheles stephensi to Plasmodium vivax infection |
title_sort |
susceptibility of wild and colonized anopheles stephensi to plasmodium vivax infection |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Malaria Journal |
issn |
1475-2875 |
publishDate |
2018-06-01 |
description |
Abstract Background As much as 80% of global Plasmodium vivax infections occur in South Asia and there is a shortage of direct studies on infectivity of P. vivax in Anopheles stephensi, the most common urban mosquito carrying human malaria. In this quest, the possible effects of laboratory colonization of mosquitoes on infectivity and development of P. vivax is of interest given that colonized mosquitoes can be genetically less divergent than the field population from which they originated. Methods Patient-derived P. vivax infected blood was fed to age-matched wild and colonized An. stephensi. Such a comparison requires coordinated availability of same-age wild and colonized mosquito populations. Here, P. vivax infection are studied in colonized An. stephensi in their 66th–86th generation and fresh field-caught An. stephensi. Wild mosquitoes were caught as larvae and pupae and allowed to develop into adult mosquitoes in the insectary. Parasite development to oocyst and sporozoite stages were assessed on days 7/8 and 12/13, respectively. Results While there were batch to batch variations in infectivity of individual patient-derived P. vivax samples, both wild and colonized An. stephensi were roughly equally susceptible to oocyst stage Plasmodium infection. At the level of sporozoite development, significantly more mosquitoes with sporozoite load of 4+ were seen in wild than in colonized populations. Conclusions Overall at the level of oocyst development, significant difference was found between the colonized and wild Anopheles stephensi in their susceptibility to P. vivax. For initial understanding of infections with local strains of P. vivax, colonized Anopheles stephensi will serve as a good model. For experiments, where high number of sporozoites are necessary, wild mosquitoes provide distinct advantage over the colonized vector populations. Understanding the molecular mechanism modulating this variability between these two populations will be prime area of focus in future studies. |
topic |
Plasmodium vivax Anopheles stephensi Oocysts Sporozoites Wild populations Colonized populations |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12936-018-2343-0 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ajeetkumarmohanty susceptibilityofwildandcolonizedanophelesstephensitoplasmodiumvivaxinfection AT praveenbalabaskarannina susceptibilityofwildandcolonizedanophelesstephensitoplasmodiumvivaxinfection AT shuvankarballav susceptibilityofwildandcolonizedanophelesstephensitoplasmodiumvivaxinfection AT smitavernekar susceptibilityofwildandcolonizedanophelesstephensitoplasmodiumvivaxinfection AT sushmaparkar susceptibilityofwildandcolonizedanophelesstephensitoplasmodiumvivaxinfection AT mariadsouza susceptibilityofwildandcolonizedanophelesstephensitoplasmodiumvivaxinfection AT wenyunzuo susceptibilityofwildandcolonizedanophelesstephensitoplasmodiumvivaxinfection AT edwingomes susceptibilityofwildandcolonizedanophelesstephensitoplasmodiumvivaxinfection AT laurachery susceptibilityofwildandcolonizedanophelesstephensitoplasmodiumvivaxinfection AT shripadtuljapurkar susceptibilityofwildandcolonizedanophelesstephensitoplasmodiumvivaxinfection AT neenavalecha susceptibilityofwildandcolonizedanophelesstephensitoplasmodiumvivaxinfection AT pradipsinhkrathod susceptibilityofwildandcolonizedanophelesstephensitoplasmodiumvivaxinfection AT ashwanikumar susceptibilityofwildandcolonizedanophelesstephensitoplasmodiumvivaxinfection |
_version_ |
1725399374081556480 |