Video laryngoscopy does not improve the intubation outcomes in emergency and critical patients – a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Abstract Background There is significant controversy regarding the influence of video laryngoscopy on the intubation outcomes in emergency and critical patients. This systematic review and meta-analysis was designed to determine whether video laryngoscopy could improve the intubation outcomes in eme...
Main Authors: | Jia Jiang, Danxu Ma, Bo Li, Yun Yue, Fushan Xue |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2017-11-01
|
Series: | Critical Care |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13054-017-1885-9 |
Similar Items
-
Comparison of adverse events between video and direct laryngoscopes for tracheal intubations in emergency department and ICU patients–a systematic review and meta-analysis
by: Jia Jiang, et al.
Published: (2020-02-01) -
GlideScope Video Laryngoscope for Difficult Intubation in Emergency Patients: a Quasi-Randomized Controlled Trial
by: Koorosh Ahmadi, et al.
Published: (2015-12-01) -
A randomized controlled study to evaluate and compare Truview blade with Macintosh blade for laryngoscopy and intubation under general anesthesia
by: Ramesh T Timanaykar, et al.
Published: (2011-01-01) -
C-MAC Video Laryngoscope versus Conventional Direct Laryngoscopy for Endotracheal Intubation During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
by: Byeong Chul Min, et al.
Published: (2019-05-01) -
Contact force exerted on the maxillary incisors by direct laryngoscopy with Macintosh and McGrath video laryngoscopy
by: Tjokorda Gde Agung Senapathi, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)