Relational Morphology: A Cousin of Construction Grammar

Relational morphology (RM) is a novel approach to word structure that bears a close relation to construction grammar (CxG). Based on the parallel architecture framework, its basic question is: what linguistic entities are stored in long-term memory, and in what form? Like CxG, RM situates the “rules...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ray Jackendoff, Jenny Audring
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02241/full
id doaj-f9d7b78252644c3f8c97e5dd7943878f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f9d7b78252644c3f8c97e5dd7943878f2020-11-25T03:22:17ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782020-09-011110.3389/fpsyg.2020.02241568663Relational Morphology: A Cousin of Construction GrammarRay Jackendoff0Ray Jackendoff1Jenny Audring2Center for Cognitive Studies, Tufts University, Medford, MA, United StatesGibson/Fedorenko Lab, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United StatesLeiden University Centre for Linguistics, Leiden University, Leiden, NetherlandsRelational morphology (RM) is a novel approach to word structure that bears a close relation to construction grammar (CxG). Based on the parallel architecture framework, its basic question is: what linguistic entities are stored in long-term memory, and in what form? Like CxG, RM situates the “rules of grammar” in an extended lexicon, right along with words, multiword expressions such as idioms and collocations, and meaningful syntactic constructions. However, its notion of schema enriches CxG’s notion of construction in a number of respects, including (a) the possibility of purely formal schemas that lack meaning, (b) a more precise way of specifying relations among lexical items than standard inheritance, (c) the possibility of “horizontal” relations between individual words and between schemas, (d) a clearer characterization of the distinction between productive and nonproductive phenomena, and (e) more explicit integration with theories of language processing and of other domains of cognition.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02241/fullrelational morphologyconstruction grammarparallel architecturelexiconlanguage processingschema
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ray Jackendoff
Ray Jackendoff
Jenny Audring
spellingShingle Ray Jackendoff
Ray Jackendoff
Jenny Audring
Relational Morphology: A Cousin of Construction Grammar
Frontiers in Psychology
relational morphology
construction grammar
parallel architecture
lexicon
language processing
schema
author_facet Ray Jackendoff
Ray Jackendoff
Jenny Audring
author_sort Ray Jackendoff
title Relational Morphology: A Cousin of Construction Grammar
title_short Relational Morphology: A Cousin of Construction Grammar
title_full Relational Morphology: A Cousin of Construction Grammar
title_fullStr Relational Morphology: A Cousin of Construction Grammar
title_full_unstemmed Relational Morphology: A Cousin of Construction Grammar
title_sort relational morphology: a cousin of construction grammar
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2020-09-01
description Relational morphology (RM) is a novel approach to word structure that bears a close relation to construction grammar (CxG). Based on the parallel architecture framework, its basic question is: what linguistic entities are stored in long-term memory, and in what form? Like CxG, RM situates the “rules of grammar” in an extended lexicon, right along with words, multiword expressions such as idioms and collocations, and meaningful syntactic constructions. However, its notion of schema enriches CxG’s notion of construction in a number of respects, including (a) the possibility of purely formal schemas that lack meaning, (b) a more precise way of specifying relations among lexical items than standard inheritance, (c) the possibility of “horizontal” relations between individual words and between schemas, (d) a clearer characterization of the distinction between productive and nonproductive phenomena, and (e) more explicit integration with theories of language processing and of other domains of cognition.
topic relational morphology
construction grammar
parallel architecture
lexicon
language processing
schema
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02241/full
work_keys_str_mv AT rayjackendoff relationalmorphologyacousinofconstructiongrammar
AT rayjackendoff relationalmorphologyacousinofconstructiongrammar
AT jennyaudring relationalmorphologyacousinofconstructiongrammar
_version_ 1724610115514925056