Bioethics Science: Is it?

Both western and eastern civilizations have linked moral teaching with theology followed by philosophy. New-knowledge-seekers about natural world, were called ‘natural philosophers'. There was a paradigm shift during industrial revolution in western world which culminated in modern science. The...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jayapaul Azariah
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2009-10-01
Series:Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.tums.ac.ir/upload_files/pdf/14247.pdf
id doaj-f9f9d9322e3b4dccbad2a7b7b72cc41e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f9f9d9322e3b4dccbad2a7b7b72cc41e2020-11-25T03:50:03ZengTehran University of Medical SciencesJournal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine2008-03872009-10-01217Bioethics Science: Is it? Jayapaul AzariahBoth western and eastern civilizations have linked moral teaching with theology followed by philosophy. New-knowledge-seekers about natural world, were called ‘natural philosophers'. There was a paradigm shift during industrial revolution in western world which culminated in modern science. The word "scientist" was coined during the 19th century. The paper examines whether natural philosophers could be called ‘scientists'? A short history of philosophical paradigm shift is given.Although written moral and "ethical principles" were in vogue from the time of Hammurabi (1750-1795 BC), the phenomenon of bioethics is very recent. Bioethics is a bridge among different sciences and a bridge to the future. The question is: Is bioethics, by itself, science? The present paper is concerned with the quality of bioethics and about the nature of science during the next 30-50 years.Science is value-free but bioethics is value-loaded. Science does not proclaim any value whereas bioethics underlines the moral life and its value to survive. The paper examines two issues: Can science be bioethics-friendly? and (ii) Can bioethics be science-friendly? It appears that both science and bioethics are incompatible. We need to develop a new system of knowledge to include/infuse the bioethical-notion of values in (into) science. Such a move may necessitate the development of an alternate but new model. Bioethics is not a science-discipline. A new term to replace science is needed. Elevating bioethics as an academic science may create job openings in India. http://journals.tums.ac.ir/upload_files/pdf/14247.pdfScienceScientistsBioethicsImmoral sciencesEvolutionary ethicsMorals
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jayapaul Azariah
spellingShingle Jayapaul Azariah
Bioethics Science: Is it?
Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine
Science
Scientists
Bioethics
Immoral sciences
Evolutionary ethics
Morals
author_facet Jayapaul Azariah
author_sort Jayapaul Azariah
title Bioethics Science: Is it?
title_short Bioethics Science: Is it?
title_full Bioethics Science: Is it?
title_fullStr Bioethics Science: Is it?
title_full_unstemmed Bioethics Science: Is it?
title_sort bioethics science: is it?
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
series Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine
issn 2008-0387
publishDate 2009-10-01
description Both western and eastern civilizations have linked moral teaching with theology followed by philosophy. New-knowledge-seekers about natural world, were called ‘natural philosophers'. There was a paradigm shift during industrial revolution in western world which culminated in modern science. The word "scientist" was coined during the 19th century. The paper examines whether natural philosophers could be called ‘scientists'? A short history of philosophical paradigm shift is given.Although written moral and "ethical principles" were in vogue from the time of Hammurabi (1750-1795 BC), the phenomenon of bioethics is very recent. Bioethics is a bridge among different sciences and a bridge to the future. The question is: Is bioethics, by itself, science? The present paper is concerned with the quality of bioethics and about the nature of science during the next 30-50 years.Science is value-free but bioethics is value-loaded. Science does not proclaim any value whereas bioethics underlines the moral life and its value to survive. The paper examines two issues: Can science be bioethics-friendly? and (ii) Can bioethics be science-friendly? It appears that both science and bioethics are incompatible. We need to develop a new system of knowledge to include/infuse the bioethical-notion of values in (into) science. Such a move may necessitate the development of an alternate but new model. Bioethics is not a science-discipline. A new term to replace science is needed. Elevating bioethics as an academic science may create job openings in India.
topic Science
Scientists
Bioethics
Immoral sciences
Evolutionary ethics
Morals
url http://journals.tums.ac.ir/upload_files/pdf/14247.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jayapaulazariah bioethicsscienceisit
_version_ 1724492702271143936