Antibiotic Administration Routes and Oral Exposure to Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria as Key Drivers for Gut Microbiota Disruption and Resistome in Poultry

Previous studies have identified oral administration of antibiotics and gut-impacting drugs as critical drivers for fecal antibiotic resistance (AR) and microbiome disruption in lab mice, but the practical implications of these findings have yet to be validated in hosts nurtured in conventional envi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yang Zhou, Yu Li, Lu Zhang, Zuowei Wu, Ying Huang, He Yan, Jiang Zhong, Li-Ju Wang, Hafiz M. Abdullah, Hua H. Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Microbiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01319/full
id doaj-f9fd9cb759e948fb985ca1c35335d329
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yang Zhou
Yang Zhou
Yu Li
Lu Zhang
Lu Zhang
Zuowei Wu
Ying Huang
Ying Huang
He Yan
He Yan
Jiang Zhong
Li-Ju Wang
Hafiz M. Abdullah
Hua H. Wang
Hua H. Wang
spellingShingle Yang Zhou
Yang Zhou
Yu Li
Lu Zhang
Lu Zhang
Zuowei Wu
Ying Huang
Ying Huang
He Yan
He Yan
Jiang Zhong
Li-Ju Wang
Hafiz M. Abdullah
Hua H. Wang
Hua H. Wang
Antibiotic Administration Routes and Oral Exposure to Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria as Key Drivers for Gut Microbiota Disruption and Resistome in Poultry
Frontiers in Microbiology
antibiotic
administration routes
oral
injection
poultry
resistome
author_facet Yang Zhou
Yang Zhou
Yu Li
Lu Zhang
Lu Zhang
Zuowei Wu
Ying Huang
Ying Huang
He Yan
He Yan
Jiang Zhong
Li-Ju Wang
Hafiz M. Abdullah
Hua H. Wang
Hua H. Wang
author_sort Yang Zhou
title Antibiotic Administration Routes and Oral Exposure to Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria as Key Drivers for Gut Microbiota Disruption and Resistome in Poultry
title_short Antibiotic Administration Routes and Oral Exposure to Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria as Key Drivers for Gut Microbiota Disruption and Resistome in Poultry
title_full Antibiotic Administration Routes and Oral Exposure to Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria as Key Drivers for Gut Microbiota Disruption and Resistome in Poultry
title_fullStr Antibiotic Administration Routes and Oral Exposure to Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria as Key Drivers for Gut Microbiota Disruption and Resistome in Poultry
title_full_unstemmed Antibiotic Administration Routes and Oral Exposure to Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria as Key Drivers for Gut Microbiota Disruption and Resistome in Poultry
title_sort antibiotic administration routes and oral exposure to antibiotic resistant bacteria as key drivers for gut microbiota disruption and resistome in poultry
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Microbiology
issn 1664-302X
publishDate 2020-07-01
description Previous studies have identified oral administration of antibiotics and gut-impacting drugs as critical drivers for fecal antibiotic resistance (AR) and microbiome disruption in lab mice, but the practical implications of these findings have yet to be validated in hosts nurtured in conventional environment. Using ampicillin (Amp) as a way to extrapolate the general effect of antibiotics, this project examined the impact of drug administration routes on fecal microbiota and resistome using poultry raised in a teaching farm. AR genes were found to be abundant in the feces of young Leghorn chicks without previous antibiotic treatment. In chickens seeded with blaCMY–2+Escherichia coli, 300 mg/kg body weight of Amp was orally administered for 5 days. This led to the fecal microbiota switching from Firmicutes occupied (95.60 ± 2.62%) and Lactobacillus rich, to being dominated by Proteobacteria (70.91 ± 28.93%), especially Escherichia/Shigella. However, when Amp was given via muscle injection, Firmicutes was mostly retained (i.e., from 83.6 ± 24.4% pre- to 90.4 ± 15.2% post-treatment). In control chickens without seeding with blaCMY–2+E. coli, oral Amp also led to the increase of Proteobacteria, dominated by Klebsiella and Escherichia/Shigella, and a reduction of Firmicutes. Specifically within Firmicutes, Enterococcus, Clostridium, etc. were enriched but Lactobacillus was diminished. The fecal resistome including Ampr genes was more abundant in chickens receiving oral Amp than those treated with muscle injection, but the difference was primarily within 1 log. The data illustrated that both drug administration routes and pre-existing gut microbiota have profound impacts on gut microbiome disruption when antibiotic treatment is given. In hosts nurtured in a conventional environment, drug administration route has the most evident impact on gut microbiota rather than the size of the targeted blaCMY–2+ gene pool, likely due to the pre-existing bacteria that are (i) less susceptible to Amp, and/or (ii) with Ampr- or multidrug resistance-encoding genes other than blaCMY–2+. These results demonstrated the critical interplay among drug administration routes, microbiota seeded through the gastrointestinal tract, AR, gut microbiota disruption, and the rise of common opportunistic pathogens in hosts. The potential implications in human and animal health are discussed.
topic antibiotic
administration routes
oral
injection
poultry
resistome
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01319/full
work_keys_str_mv AT yangzhou antibioticadministrationroutesandoralexposuretoantibioticresistantbacteriaaskeydriversforgutmicrobiotadisruptionandresistomeinpoultry
AT yangzhou antibioticadministrationroutesandoralexposuretoantibioticresistantbacteriaaskeydriversforgutmicrobiotadisruptionandresistomeinpoultry
AT yuli antibioticadministrationroutesandoralexposuretoantibioticresistantbacteriaaskeydriversforgutmicrobiotadisruptionandresistomeinpoultry
AT luzhang antibioticadministrationroutesandoralexposuretoantibioticresistantbacteriaaskeydriversforgutmicrobiotadisruptionandresistomeinpoultry
AT luzhang antibioticadministrationroutesandoralexposuretoantibioticresistantbacteriaaskeydriversforgutmicrobiotadisruptionandresistomeinpoultry
AT zuoweiwu antibioticadministrationroutesandoralexposuretoantibioticresistantbacteriaaskeydriversforgutmicrobiotadisruptionandresistomeinpoultry
AT yinghuang antibioticadministrationroutesandoralexposuretoantibioticresistantbacteriaaskeydriversforgutmicrobiotadisruptionandresistomeinpoultry
AT yinghuang antibioticadministrationroutesandoralexposuretoantibioticresistantbacteriaaskeydriversforgutmicrobiotadisruptionandresistomeinpoultry
AT heyan antibioticadministrationroutesandoralexposuretoantibioticresistantbacteriaaskeydriversforgutmicrobiotadisruptionandresistomeinpoultry
AT heyan antibioticadministrationroutesandoralexposuretoantibioticresistantbacteriaaskeydriversforgutmicrobiotadisruptionandresistomeinpoultry
AT jiangzhong antibioticadministrationroutesandoralexposuretoantibioticresistantbacteriaaskeydriversforgutmicrobiotadisruptionandresistomeinpoultry
AT lijuwang antibioticadministrationroutesandoralexposuretoantibioticresistantbacteriaaskeydriversforgutmicrobiotadisruptionandresistomeinpoultry
AT hafizmabdullah antibioticadministrationroutesandoralexposuretoantibioticresistantbacteriaaskeydriversforgutmicrobiotadisruptionandresistomeinpoultry
AT huahwang antibioticadministrationroutesandoralexposuretoantibioticresistantbacteriaaskeydriversforgutmicrobiotadisruptionandresistomeinpoultry
AT huahwang antibioticadministrationroutesandoralexposuretoantibioticresistantbacteriaaskeydriversforgutmicrobiotadisruptionandresistomeinpoultry
_version_ 1724549492392329216
spelling doaj-f9fd9cb759e948fb985ca1c35335d3292020-11-25T03:36:32ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Microbiology1664-302X2020-07-011110.3389/fmicb.2020.01319528224Antibiotic Administration Routes and Oral Exposure to Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria as Key Drivers for Gut Microbiota Disruption and Resistome in PoultryYang Zhou0Yang Zhou1Yu Li2Lu Zhang3Lu Zhang4Zuowei Wu5Ying Huang6Ying Huang7He Yan8He Yan9Jiang Zhong10Li-Ju Wang11Hafiz M. Abdullah12Hua H. Wang13Hua H. Wang14Department of Food Science and Technology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United StatesDepartment of Microbiology, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Food Science and Technology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United StatesDepartment of Food Science and Technology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United StatesCollege of Food Science and Engineering of Technology, Guangzhou, ChinaCollege of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United StatesDepartment of Food Science and Technology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United StatesCollege of Food Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, ChinaDepartment of Food Science and Technology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United StatesCollege of Food Science and Engineering of Technology, Guangzhou, ChinaDepartment of Microbiology, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Food Science and Technology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United StatesDepartment of Animal Science Poultry Facility, OARDC, Wooster, OH, United StatesDepartment of Food Science and Technology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United StatesDepartment of Microbiology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United StatesPrevious studies have identified oral administration of antibiotics and gut-impacting drugs as critical drivers for fecal antibiotic resistance (AR) and microbiome disruption in lab mice, but the practical implications of these findings have yet to be validated in hosts nurtured in conventional environment. Using ampicillin (Amp) as a way to extrapolate the general effect of antibiotics, this project examined the impact of drug administration routes on fecal microbiota and resistome using poultry raised in a teaching farm. AR genes were found to be abundant in the feces of young Leghorn chicks without previous antibiotic treatment. In chickens seeded with blaCMY–2+Escherichia coli, 300 mg/kg body weight of Amp was orally administered for 5 days. This led to the fecal microbiota switching from Firmicutes occupied (95.60 ± 2.62%) and Lactobacillus rich, to being dominated by Proteobacteria (70.91 ± 28.93%), especially Escherichia/Shigella. However, when Amp was given via muscle injection, Firmicutes was mostly retained (i.e., from 83.6 ± 24.4% pre- to 90.4 ± 15.2% post-treatment). In control chickens without seeding with blaCMY–2+E. coli, oral Amp also led to the increase of Proteobacteria, dominated by Klebsiella and Escherichia/Shigella, and a reduction of Firmicutes. Specifically within Firmicutes, Enterococcus, Clostridium, etc. were enriched but Lactobacillus was diminished. The fecal resistome including Ampr genes was more abundant in chickens receiving oral Amp than those treated with muscle injection, but the difference was primarily within 1 log. The data illustrated that both drug administration routes and pre-existing gut microbiota have profound impacts on gut microbiome disruption when antibiotic treatment is given. In hosts nurtured in a conventional environment, drug administration route has the most evident impact on gut microbiota rather than the size of the targeted blaCMY–2+ gene pool, likely due to the pre-existing bacteria that are (i) less susceptible to Amp, and/or (ii) with Ampr- or multidrug resistance-encoding genes other than blaCMY–2+. These results demonstrated the critical interplay among drug administration routes, microbiota seeded through the gastrointestinal tract, AR, gut microbiota disruption, and the rise of common opportunistic pathogens in hosts. The potential implications in human and animal health are discussed.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01319/fullantibioticadministration routesoralinjectionpoultryresistome