Radiographic texture reproducibility: The impact of different materials, their arrangement, and focal spot size

Background: Feature reproducibility is a critical issue in quantitative radiomic studies. The aim of this study is to assess how radiographic radiomic textures behave against changes in phantom materials, their arrangements, and focal spot size. Method: A phantom with detachable parts was made using...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Younes Qasempour, Amirsalar Mohammadi, Mostafa Rezaei, Parisa Pouryazadanpanah, Fatemeh Ziaddini, Alma Borbori, Isaac Shiri, Ghasem Hajianfar, Azam Janati, Sareh Ghasemirad, Hamid Abdollahi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2020-01-01
Series:Journal of Medical Signals and Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jmssjournal.net/article.asp?issn=2228-7477;year=2020;volume=10;issue=4;spage=275;epage=285;aulast=Qasempour
id doaj-fa2a25ea5147474d810a9e2f5d59eb6e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fa2a25ea5147474d810a9e2f5d59eb6e2020-12-02T13:11:11ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Medical Signals and Sensors2228-74772020-01-0110427528510.4103/jmss.JMSS_64_19Radiographic texture reproducibility: The impact of different materials, their arrangement, and focal spot sizeYounes QasempourAmirsalar MohammadiMostafa RezaeiParisa PouryazadanpanahFatemeh ZiaddiniAlma BorboriIsaac ShiriGhasem HajianfarAzam JanatiSareh GhasemiradHamid AbdollahiBackground: Feature reproducibility is a critical issue in quantitative radiomic studies. The aim of this study is to assess how radiographic radiomic textures behave against changes in phantom materials, their arrangements, and focal spot size. Method: A phantom with detachable parts was made using wood, sponge, Plexiglas, and rubber. Each material had 1 cm thickness and was imaged for consecutive time. The phantom also was imaged by change in the arrangement of its materials. Imaging was done with two focal spot sizes including 0.6 and 1.2 mm. All images were acquired with a digital radiography machine. Several texture features were extracted from the same size region of interest in all images. To assess reproducibility, coefficient of variation (COV), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and Bland–Altman tests were used. Results: Results show that 59%, 50%, and 4.5% of all features are most reproducible (COV ≤5%) against change in focal spot size, material arrangements, and phantom's materials, respectively. Results on Bland–Altman analysis showed that there is just a nonreproducible feature against change in the focal spot size. On the ICC results, we observed that the ICCs for more features are >0.90 and there were few features with ICC lower than 0.90. Conclusion: We showed that radiomic textures are vulnerable against changes in materials, arrangement, and different focal spot sizes. These results suggest that a careful analysis of the effects of these parameters is essential before any radiomic clinical application.http://www.jmssjournal.net/article.asp?issn=2228-7477;year=2020;volume=10;issue=4;spage=275;epage=285;aulast=Qasempourarrangementfocal spotmaterialsradiomic texturesreproducibility
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Younes Qasempour
Amirsalar Mohammadi
Mostafa Rezaei
Parisa Pouryazadanpanah
Fatemeh Ziaddini
Alma Borbori
Isaac Shiri
Ghasem Hajianfar
Azam Janati
Sareh Ghasemirad
Hamid Abdollahi
spellingShingle Younes Qasempour
Amirsalar Mohammadi
Mostafa Rezaei
Parisa Pouryazadanpanah
Fatemeh Ziaddini
Alma Borbori
Isaac Shiri
Ghasem Hajianfar
Azam Janati
Sareh Ghasemirad
Hamid Abdollahi
Radiographic texture reproducibility: The impact of different materials, their arrangement, and focal spot size
Journal of Medical Signals and Sensors
arrangement
focal spot
materials
radiomic textures
reproducibility
author_facet Younes Qasempour
Amirsalar Mohammadi
Mostafa Rezaei
Parisa Pouryazadanpanah
Fatemeh Ziaddini
Alma Borbori
Isaac Shiri
Ghasem Hajianfar
Azam Janati
Sareh Ghasemirad
Hamid Abdollahi
author_sort Younes Qasempour
title Radiographic texture reproducibility: The impact of different materials, their arrangement, and focal spot size
title_short Radiographic texture reproducibility: The impact of different materials, their arrangement, and focal spot size
title_full Radiographic texture reproducibility: The impact of different materials, their arrangement, and focal spot size
title_fullStr Radiographic texture reproducibility: The impact of different materials, their arrangement, and focal spot size
title_full_unstemmed Radiographic texture reproducibility: The impact of different materials, their arrangement, and focal spot size
title_sort radiographic texture reproducibility: the impact of different materials, their arrangement, and focal spot size
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Medical Signals and Sensors
issn 2228-7477
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Background: Feature reproducibility is a critical issue in quantitative radiomic studies. The aim of this study is to assess how radiographic radiomic textures behave against changes in phantom materials, their arrangements, and focal spot size. Method: A phantom with detachable parts was made using wood, sponge, Plexiglas, and rubber. Each material had 1 cm thickness and was imaged for consecutive time. The phantom also was imaged by change in the arrangement of its materials. Imaging was done with two focal spot sizes including 0.6 and 1.2 mm. All images were acquired with a digital radiography machine. Several texture features were extracted from the same size region of interest in all images. To assess reproducibility, coefficient of variation (COV), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and Bland–Altman tests were used. Results: Results show that 59%, 50%, and 4.5% of all features are most reproducible (COV ≤5%) against change in focal spot size, material arrangements, and phantom's materials, respectively. Results on Bland–Altman analysis showed that there is just a nonreproducible feature against change in the focal spot size. On the ICC results, we observed that the ICCs for more features are >0.90 and there were few features with ICC lower than 0.90. Conclusion: We showed that radiomic textures are vulnerable against changes in materials, arrangement, and different focal spot sizes. These results suggest that a careful analysis of the effects of these parameters is essential before any radiomic clinical application.
topic arrangement
focal spot
materials
radiomic textures
reproducibility
url http://www.jmssjournal.net/article.asp?issn=2228-7477;year=2020;volume=10;issue=4;spage=275;epage=285;aulast=Qasempour
work_keys_str_mv AT younesqasempour radiographictexturereproducibilitytheimpactofdifferentmaterialstheirarrangementandfocalspotsize
AT amirsalarmohammadi radiographictexturereproducibilitytheimpactofdifferentmaterialstheirarrangementandfocalspotsize
AT mostafarezaei radiographictexturereproducibilitytheimpactofdifferentmaterialstheirarrangementandfocalspotsize
AT parisapouryazadanpanah radiographictexturereproducibilitytheimpactofdifferentmaterialstheirarrangementandfocalspotsize
AT fatemehziaddini radiographictexturereproducibilitytheimpactofdifferentmaterialstheirarrangementandfocalspotsize
AT almaborbori radiographictexturereproducibilitytheimpactofdifferentmaterialstheirarrangementandfocalspotsize
AT isaacshiri radiographictexturereproducibilitytheimpactofdifferentmaterialstheirarrangementandfocalspotsize
AT ghasemhajianfar radiographictexturereproducibilitytheimpactofdifferentmaterialstheirarrangementandfocalspotsize
AT azamjanati radiographictexturereproducibilitytheimpactofdifferentmaterialstheirarrangementandfocalspotsize
AT sarehghasemirad radiographictexturereproducibilitytheimpactofdifferentmaterialstheirarrangementandfocalspotsize
AT hamidabdollahi radiographictexturereproducibilitytheimpactofdifferentmaterialstheirarrangementandfocalspotsize
_version_ 1724406374513770496