Olfactory response of two different Bactrocera fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) on banana, guava, and mango fruits
Bactrocera dorsalis and B. correcta (Diptera: Tephritidae) are economically important pests of fruits and have caused serious damage to fruits for the last several years worldwide. In China, B. correcta is second economic pest of fruits after B. dorsalis. Considering the importance of Integrated Pes...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2021-07-01
|
Series: | Journal of King Saud University: Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1018364721001166 |
id |
doaj-fa465c99ffd8459cbafd4aca1012a905 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Waqar Jaleel Rabia Saeed Muhammad Zeeshan Shabbir Rashid Azad Shahbaz Ali Muhammad Umair Sial Dalal M. Aljedani Hamed A. Ghramh Khalid Ali Khan Desen Wang Yurong He |
spellingShingle |
Waqar Jaleel Rabia Saeed Muhammad Zeeshan Shabbir Rashid Azad Shahbaz Ali Muhammad Umair Sial Dalal M. Aljedani Hamed A. Ghramh Khalid Ali Khan Desen Wang Yurong He Olfactory response of two different Bactrocera fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) on banana, guava, and mango fruits Journal of King Saud University: Science Bactrocera species Butanoic acid-3-methylbutyl ester Fruits preference 3-Carene And α-caryophyllene |
author_facet |
Waqar Jaleel Rabia Saeed Muhammad Zeeshan Shabbir Rashid Azad Shahbaz Ali Muhammad Umair Sial Dalal M. Aljedani Hamed A. Ghramh Khalid Ali Khan Desen Wang Yurong He |
author_sort |
Waqar Jaleel |
title |
Olfactory response of two different Bactrocera fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) on banana, guava, and mango fruits |
title_short |
Olfactory response of two different Bactrocera fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) on banana, guava, and mango fruits |
title_full |
Olfactory response of two different Bactrocera fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) on banana, guava, and mango fruits |
title_fullStr |
Olfactory response of two different Bactrocera fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) on banana, guava, and mango fruits |
title_full_unstemmed |
Olfactory response of two different Bactrocera fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) on banana, guava, and mango fruits |
title_sort |
olfactory response of two different bactrocera fruit flies (diptera: tephritidae) on banana, guava, and mango fruits |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Journal of King Saud University: Science |
issn |
1018-3647 |
publishDate |
2021-07-01 |
description |
Bactrocera dorsalis and B. correcta (Diptera: Tephritidae) are economically important pests of fruits and have caused serious damage to fruits for the last several years worldwide. In China, B. correcta is second economic pest of fruits after B. dorsalis. Considering the importance of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) programs, Information regarding host preference and fitness of both Bactrocera species are necessary for better management strategies. Therefore, the current study explains the response of both Bactrocera species on banana, guava, and mango fruits. The cultivar of banana, guava, and mango fruits used first time in this study. Therefore, the volatile/aromatic components of banana, guava, and mango fruits were determined using porapak Q via gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC–MS). Results concluded that the number of male flies of both species on each types of fruits were lower in comparison to female flies. The number of flies and oviposition punctures by female B. dorsalis flies were maximum on mango fruits than those of guava and banana fruits. While in the case of B. correcta, the guava fruits were preferable for visits and oviposition punctures than those of other two fruits. Mango fruits were more favorable for the development and survival of both Bactrocera species than those of other two fruits. The GC/MS results indicated that butanoic acid-3-methylbutyl ester, α-caryophyllene, and 3-carene were the major volatile components of banana, guava, and mango fruits, respectively. Based on the results, mango and guava fruits were more suitable for both Bactrocera species. Future studies are needed to confirm the results of this laboratory study in the fruit orchards. |
topic |
Bactrocera species Butanoic acid-3-methylbutyl ester Fruits preference 3-Carene And α-caryophyllene |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1018364721001166 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT waqarjaleel olfactoryresponseoftwodifferentbactrocerafruitfliesdipteratephritidaeonbananaguavaandmangofruits AT rabiasaeed olfactoryresponseoftwodifferentbactrocerafruitfliesdipteratephritidaeonbananaguavaandmangofruits AT muhammadzeeshanshabbir olfactoryresponseoftwodifferentbactrocerafruitfliesdipteratephritidaeonbananaguavaandmangofruits AT rashidazad olfactoryresponseoftwodifferentbactrocerafruitfliesdipteratephritidaeonbananaguavaandmangofruits AT shahbazali olfactoryresponseoftwodifferentbactrocerafruitfliesdipteratephritidaeonbananaguavaandmangofruits AT muhammadumairsial olfactoryresponseoftwodifferentbactrocerafruitfliesdipteratephritidaeonbananaguavaandmangofruits AT dalalmaljedani olfactoryresponseoftwodifferentbactrocerafruitfliesdipteratephritidaeonbananaguavaandmangofruits AT hamedaghramh olfactoryresponseoftwodifferentbactrocerafruitfliesdipteratephritidaeonbananaguavaandmangofruits AT khalidalikhan olfactoryresponseoftwodifferentbactrocerafruitfliesdipteratephritidaeonbananaguavaandmangofruits AT desenwang olfactoryresponseoftwodifferentbactrocerafruitfliesdipteratephritidaeonbananaguavaandmangofruits AT yuronghe olfactoryresponseoftwodifferentbactrocerafruitfliesdipteratephritidaeonbananaguavaandmangofruits |
_version_ |
1721374588423634944 |
spelling |
doaj-fa465c99ffd8459cbafd4aca1012a9052021-06-17T04:45:39ZengElsevierJournal of King Saud University: Science1018-36472021-07-01335101455Olfactory response of two different Bactrocera fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) on banana, guava, and mango fruitsWaqar Jaleel0Rabia Saeed1Muhammad Zeeshan Shabbir2Rashid Azad3Shahbaz Ali4Muhammad Umair Sial5Dalal M. Aljedani6Hamed A. Ghramh7Khalid Ali Khan8Desen Wang9Yurong He10Department of Entomology, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China; Key Laboratory of Bio-Pesticide Innovation and Application, Guangdong Province, Guangzhou 510642, China; Engineering Research Center of Biological Control, Ministry of Education, Guangzhou 510642, China; Plant Protection Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China; Department of Bioinformatics, College of Life Science, Institute of Life Science and Green Development, Hebei University, Baoding 071002, China; Corresponding authors at: Department of Entomology, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.Central Cotton Research Institute, Multan PakistanPlant Protection Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, ChinaDepartment of Entomology, The University of Haripur, PakistanFareed Biodiversity and Conservation Centre, Department of Agricultural Engineering, Khawaja Fareed University of Engineering and Information Technology, Rahim Yar Khan, Punjab, PakistanInstitute of Plant Protection, Muhammad Nawaz Shareef University of Agriculture, Multan, PakistanDepartment of Biological Sciences, College of Science, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi ArabiaResearch Center for Advanced Materials Science (RCAMS), King Khalid University, P.O. Box 9004, Abha 61413, Saudi Arabia; Unit of Bee Research and Honey Production, Faculty of Science, King Khalid University, P.O. Box 9004, Abha 61413, Saudi Arabia; Biology Department, Faculty of Science, King Khalid University, P.O. Box 9004 Abha 61413 Box 9004, Abha 61413, Saudi ArabiaResearch Center for Advanced Materials Science (RCAMS), King Khalid University, P.O. Box 9004, Abha 61413, Saudi Arabia; Unit of Bee Research and Honey Production, Faculty of Science, King Khalid University, P.O. Box 9004, Abha 61413, Saudi Arabia; Biology Department, Faculty of Science, King Khalid University, P.O. Box 9004 Abha 61413 Box 9004, Abha 61413, Saudi ArabiaDepartment of Entomology, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China; Key Laboratory of Bio-Pesticide Innovation and Application, Guangdong Province, Guangzhou 510642, China; Engineering Research Center of Biological Control, Ministry of Education, Guangzhou 510642, ChinaDepartment of Entomology, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China; Key Laboratory of Bio-Pesticide Innovation and Application, Guangdong Province, Guangzhou 510642, China; Engineering Research Center of Biological Control, Ministry of Education, Guangzhou 510642, China; Corresponding authors at: Department of Entomology, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.Bactrocera dorsalis and B. correcta (Diptera: Tephritidae) are economically important pests of fruits and have caused serious damage to fruits for the last several years worldwide. In China, B. correcta is second economic pest of fruits after B. dorsalis. Considering the importance of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) programs, Information regarding host preference and fitness of both Bactrocera species are necessary for better management strategies. Therefore, the current study explains the response of both Bactrocera species on banana, guava, and mango fruits. The cultivar of banana, guava, and mango fruits used first time in this study. Therefore, the volatile/aromatic components of banana, guava, and mango fruits were determined using porapak Q via gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC–MS). Results concluded that the number of male flies of both species on each types of fruits were lower in comparison to female flies. The number of flies and oviposition punctures by female B. dorsalis flies were maximum on mango fruits than those of guava and banana fruits. While in the case of B. correcta, the guava fruits were preferable for visits and oviposition punctures than those of other two fruits. Mango fruits were more favorable for the development and survival of both Bactrocera species than those of other two fruits. The GC/MS results indicated that butanoic acid-3-methylbutyl ester, α-caryophyllene, and 3-carene were the major volatile components of banana, guava, and mango fruits, respectively. Based on the results, mango and guava fruits were more suitable for both Bactrocera species. Future studies are needed to confirm the results of this laboratory study in the fruit orchards.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1018364721001166Bactrocera speciesButanoic acid-3-methylbutyl esterFruits preference3-CareneAnd α-caryophyllene |