Deep reefs are not refugium for shallow‐water fish communities in the southwestern Atlantic

Abstract The deep reef refugia hypothesis (DRRH) predicts that deep reef ecosystems may act as refugium for the biota of disturbed shallow waters. Because deep reefs are among the most understudied habitats on Earth, formal tests of the DRRH remain scarce. If the DRRH is valid at the community level...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aline P. M. Medeiros, Beatrice P. Ferreira, Fredy Alvarado, Ricardo Betancur‐R, Marcelo O. Soares, Bráulio A. Santos
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-05-01
Series:Ecology and Evolution
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7336
id doaj-fa70edb58b1e40c79975b0adf65963eb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fa70edb58b1e40c79975b0adf65963eb2021-05-04T06:13:21ZengWileyEcology and Evolution2045-77582021-05-011194413442710.1002/ece3.7336Deep reefs are not refugium for shallow‐water fish communities in the southwestern AtlanticAline P. M. Medeiros0Beatrice P. Ferreira1Fredy Alvarado2Ricardo Betancur‐R3Marcelo O. Soares4Bráulio A. Santos5Programa de Pós‐Graduação em Ciências Biológicas Universidade Federal da Paraíba João Pessoa PB BrazilDepartamento de Oceanografia Centro de Tecnologia Universidade Federal de Pernambuco Recife BrazilDepartamento de Agricultura Centro de Ciências Humanas Sociais e Agrárias Universidade Federal da Paraíba Bananeiras PB BrazilDepartment of Biology The University of Oklahoma Norman OK USAInstituto de Ciências do Mar‐LABOMAR Universidade Federal do Ceará Meireles BrazilDepartamento de Sistemática e Ecologia Centro de Ciências Exatas e da Natureza Universidade Federal da Paraíba João Pessoa PB BrazilAbstract The deep reef refugia hypothesis (DRRH) predicts that deep reef ecosystems may act as refugium for the biota of disturbed shallow waters. Because deep reefs are among the most understudied habitats on Earth, formal tests of the DRRH remain scarce. If the DRRH is valid at the community level, the diversity of species, functions, and lineages of fish communities of shallow reefs should be encapsulated in deep reefs. We tested the DRRH by assessing the taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversity of 22 Brazilian fish communities between 2 and 62 m depth. We partitioned the gamma diversity of shallow (<30 m) and deep reefs (>30 m) into independent alpha and beta components, accounted for species’ abundance, and assessed whether beta patterns were mostly driven by spatial turnover or nestedness. We recorded 3,821 fishes belonging to 85 species and 36 families. Contrary to DRRH expectations, only 48% of the species occurred in both shallow and deep reefs. Alpha diversity of rare species was higher in deep reefs as expected, but alpha diversity of typical and dominant species did not vary with depth. Alpha functional diversity was higher in deep reefs only for rare and typical species, but not for dominant species. Alpha phylogenetic diversity was consistently higher in deep reefs, supporting DRRH expectations. Profiles of taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic beta diversity indicated that deep reefs were not more heterogeneous than shallow reefs, contradicting expectations of biotic homogenization near sea surface. Furthermore, pairwise beta‐diversity analyses revealed that the patterns were mostly driven by spatial turnover rather than nestedness at any depth. Conclusions. Although some results support the DRRH, most indicate that the shallow‐water reef fish diversity is not fully encapsulated in deep reefs. Every reef contributes significantly to the regional diversity and must be managed and protected accordingly.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7336coral reefsdepthfishmesophotic coral ecosystems
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Aline P. M. Medeiros
Beatrice P. Ferreira
Fredy Alvarado
Ricardo Betancur‐R
Marcelo O. Soares
Bráulio A. Santos
spellingShingle Aline P. M. Medeiros
Beatrice P. Ferreira
Fredy Alvarado
Ricardo Betancur‐R
Marcelo O. Soares
Bráulio A. Santos
Deep reefs are not refugium for shallow‐water fish communities in the southwestern Atlantic
Ecology and Evolution
coral reefs
depth
fish
mesophotic coral ecosystems
author_facet Aline P. M. Medeiros
Beatrice P. Ferreira
Fredy Alvarado
Ricardo Betancur‐R
Marcelo O. Soares
Bráulio A. Santos
author_sort Aline P. M. Medeiros
title Deep reefs are not refugium for shallow‐water fish communities in the southwestern Atlantic
title_short Deep reefs are not refugium for shallow‐water fish communities in the southwestern Atlantic
title_full Deep reefs are not refugium for shallow‐water fish communities in the southwestern Atlantic
title_fullStr Deep reefs are not refugium for shallow‐water fish communities in the southwestern Atlantic
title_full_unstemmed Deep reefs are not refugium for shallow‐water fish communities in the southwestern Atlantic
title_sort deep reefs are not refugium for shallow‐water fish communities in the southwestern atlantic
publisher Wiley
series Ecology and Evolution
issn 2045-7758
publishDate 2021-05-01
description Abstract The deep reef refugia hypothesis (DRRH) predicts that deep reef ecosystems may act as refugium for the biota of disturbed shallow waters. Because deep reefs are among the most understudied habitats on Earth, formal tests of the DRRH remain scarce. If the DRRH is valid at the community level, the diversity of species, functions, and lineages of fish communities of shallow reefs should be encapsulated in deep reefs. We tested the DRRH by assessing the taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversity of 22 Brazilian fish communities between 2 and 62 m depth. We partitioned the gamma diversity of shallow (<30 m) and deep reefs (>30 m) into independent alpha and beta components, accounted for species’ abundance, and assessed whether beta patterns were mostly driven by spatial turnover or nestedness. We recorded 3,821 fishes belonging to 85 species and 36 families. Contrary to DRRH expectations, only 48% of the species occurred in both shallow and deep reefs. Alpha diversity of rare species was higher in deep reefs as expected, but alpha diversity of typical and dominant species did not vary with depth. Alpha functional diversity was higher in deep reefs only for rare and typical species, but not for dominant species. Alpha phylogenetic diversity was consistently higher in deep reefs, supporting DRRH expectations. Profiles of taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic beta diversity indicated that deep reefs were not more heterogeneous than shallow reefs, contradicting expectations of biotic homogenization near sea surface. Furthermore, pairwise beta‐diversity analyses revealed that the patterns were mostly driven by spatial turnover rather than nestedness at any depth. Conclusions. Although some results support the DRRH, most indicate that the shallow‐water reef fish diversity is not fully encapsulated in deep reefs. Every reef contributes significantly to the regional diversity and must be managed and protected accordingly.
topic coral reefs
depth
fish
mesophotic coral ecosystems
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7336
work_keys_str_mv AT alinepmmedeiros deepreefsarenotrefugiumforshallowwaterfishcommunitiesinthesouthwesternatlantic
AT beatricepferreira deepreefsarenotrefugiumforshallowwaterfishcommunitiesinthesouthwesternatlantic
AT fredyalvarado deepreefsarenotrefugiumforshallowwaterfishcommunitiesinthesouthwesternatlantic
AT ricardobetancurr deepreefsarenotrefugiumforshallowwaterfishcommunitiesinthesouthwesternatlantic
AT marceloosoares deepreefsarenotrefugiumforshallowwaterfishcommunitiesinthesouthwesternatlantic
AT braulioasantos deepreefsarenotrefugiumforshallowwaterfishcommunitiesinthesouthwesternatlantic
_version_ 1721481897593274368