Comparative Analysis of Granular and Membrane Filters for Rainwater Treatment

The objective of this study was to compare the efficiency of rainwater treatment using two types of filters: one with filtration materials (gravel, sand, and anthracite) and the other employing membranes. In both cases, the quality of the rainwater after passing through the filter met the standards...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Celimar Azambuja Teixeira, Enedir Ghisi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-05-01
Series:Water
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/11/5/1004
id doaj-fa81398b04e34683a734f0ec2771aef2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fa81398b04e34683a734f0ec2771aef22020-11-25T00:14:19ZengMDPI AGWater2073-44412019-05-01115100410.3390/w11051004w11051004Comparative Analysis of Granular and Membrane Filters for Rainwater TreatmentCelimar Azambuja Teixeira0Enedir Ghisi1Department of Civil Engineering, Federal Technological University of Paraná, Curitiba, PR 81280-340, BrazilLaboratory of Energy Efficiency in Buildings, Department of Civil Engineering, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC 88040-900, BrazilThe objective of this study was to compare the efficiency of rainwater treatment using two types of filters: one with filtration materials (gravel, sand, and anthracite) and the other employing membranes. In both cases, the quality of the rainwater after passing through the filter met the standards required by NBR 15527:2007 (Brazilian Association of Technical Standards (ABNT)) and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for non-potable uses according to the parameters pH, temperature, turbidity, ammonia, nitrate, nitrite, alkalinity, and calcium hardness. The results obtained were also compared with Directive 2914/2011 of the Brazilian Ministry of Health, which deals with water potability, and with Resolution 357/2005 of CONAMA (Brazilian National Council for the Environment), which is applied to surface water bodies, especially rivers, and establishes the possibility of direct contact of the water with human skin. It was concluded that the rainwater obtained from both filters could be used for non-potable uses, such as toilet flushing, garden irrigation, and sidewalk cleaning, as well as for direct-contact activities, such as bathing and washing clothes.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/11/5/1004water conservationrainwater userainwater treatmentfilters
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Celimar Azambuja Teixeira
Enedir Ghisi
spellingShingle Celimar Azambuja Teixeira
Enedir Ghisi
Comparative Analysis of Granular and Membrane Filters for Rainwater Treatment
Water
water conservation
rainwater use
rainwater treatment
filters
author_facet Celimar Azambuja Teixeira
Enedir Ghisi
author_sort Celimar Azambuja Teixeira
title Comparative Analysis of Granular and Membrane Filters for Rainwater Treatment
title_short Comparative Analysis of Granular and Membrane Filters for Rainwater Treatment
title_full Comparative Analysis of Granular and Membrane Filters for Rainwater Treatment
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of Granular and Membrane Filters for Rainwater Treatment
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of Granular and Membrane Filters for Rainwater Treatment
title_sort comparative analysis of granular and membrane filters for rainwater treatment
publisher MDPI AG
series Water
issn 2073-4441
publishDate 2019-05-01
description The objective of this study was to compare the efficiency of rainwater treatment using two types of filters: one with filtration materials (gravel, sand, and anthracite) and the other employing membranes. In both cases, the quality of the rainwater after passing through the filter met the standards required by NBR 15527:2007 (Brazilian Association of Technical Standards (ABNT)) and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for non-potable uses according to the parameters pH, temperature, turbidity, ammonia, nitrate, nitrite, alkalinity, and calcium hardness. The results obtained were also compared with Directive 2914/2011 of the Brazilian Ministry of Health, which deals with water potability, and with Resolution 357/2005 of CONAMA (Brazilian National Council for the Environment), which is applied to surface water bodies, especially rivers, and establishes the possibility of direct contact of the water with human skin. It was concluded that the rainwater obtained from both filters could be used for non-potable uses, such as toilet flushing, garden irrigation, and sidewalk cleaning, as well as for direct-contact activities, such as bathing and washing clothes.
topic water conservation
rainwater use
rainwater treatment
filters
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/11/5/1004
work_keys_str_mv AT celimarazambujateixeira comparativeanalysisofgranularandmembranefiltersforrainwatertreatment
AT enedirghisi comparativeanalysisofgranularandmembranefiltersforrainwatertreatment
_version_ 1725391138319237120