Use of item response theory to investigate disability-related questions in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

Objectives: Accurately measuring disability is critical toward policy development, economic analyses, and determining individual-level effects of health interventions. Nationally representative population surveys such as the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey provide key opportunities...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Samuel W Terman, James F Burke
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2021-04-01
Series:SAGE Open Medicine
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/20503121211012253
id doaj-fb325c70d5944915807cc4bd23615a4d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fb325c70d5944915807cc4bd23615a4d2021-05-07T22:33:33ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open Medicine2050-31212021-04-01910.1177/20503121211012253Use of item response theory to investigate disability-related questions in the National Health and Nutrition Examination SurveySamuel W Terman0James F Burke1Institute for Healthcare Policy & Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USAInstitute for Healthcare Policy & Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USAObjectives: Accurately measuring disability is critical toward policy development, economic analyses, and determining individual-level effects of health interventions. Nationally representative population surveys such as the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey provide key opportunities to measure disability constructs such as activity limitations. However, only very limited work has previously evaluated the item response properties of questions pertaining to limitations in National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study. We included participants ⩾20 years old for the 2013–2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey cycles. Activity limitations, and a smaller number of body function impairments or participation restrictions, were determined from interview questions. We performed item response theory models (a two-parameter logistic and a graded response model) to characterize discriminating information along the latent continuum of activity limitation. Results: We included 17,057 participants. Although each particular limitation was somewhat rare (maximally 13%), 7214 (38%) responded having at least one limitation. We found a high amount of discriminating information at 1–2 standard deviations above average limitation, though essentially zero discrimination below that range. Items had substantial overlap in the range at which they provided information distinguishing individuals. The ordinal graded response model including 20 limitations provided greater information than the dichotomous two-parameter logistic model, though further omitting items from the graded response model led to loss of information. Conclusion: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey disability-related questions, mostly specifically activity limitations, provided a high degree of information distinguishing individuals with higher than average limitations on the latent continuum, but essentially zero resolution to distinguish individuals with low or average limitations. Future work may focus on developing items which better distinguish individuals at the “lower” end of the limitation spectrum.https://doi.org/10.1177/20503121211012253
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Samuel W Terman
James F Burke
spellingShingle Samuel W Terman
James F Burke
Use of item response theory to investigate disability-related questions in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
SAGE Open Medicine
author_facet Samuel W Terman
James F Burke
author_sort Samuel W Terman
title Use of item response theory to investigate disability-related questions in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
title_short Use of item response theory to investigate disability-related questions in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
title_full Use of item response theory to investigate disability-related questions in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
title_fullStr Use of item response theory to investigate disability-related questions in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
title_full_unstemmed Use of item response theory to investigate disability-related questions in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
title_sort use of item response theory to investigate disability-related questions in the national health and nutrition examination survey
publisher SAGE Publishing
series SAGE Open Medicine
issn 2050-3121
publishDate 2021-04-01
description Objectives: Accurately measuring disability is critical toward policy development, economic analyses, and determining individual-level effects of health interventions. Nationally representative population surveys such as the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey provide key opportunities to measure disability constructs such as activity limitations. However, only very limited work has previously evaluated the item response properties of questions pertaining to limitations in National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study. We included participants ⩾20 years old for the 2013–2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey cycles. Activity limitations, and a smaller number of body function impairments or participation restrictions, were determined from interview questions. We performed item response theory models (a two-parameter logistic and a graded response model) to characterize discriminating information along the latent continuum of activity limitation. Results: We included 17,057 participants. Although each particular limitation was somewhat rare (maximally 13%), 7214 (38%) responded having at least one limitation. We found a high amount of discriminating information at 1–2 standard deviations above average limitation, though essentially zero discrimination below that range. Items had substantial overlap in the range at which they provided information distinguishing individuals. The ordinal graded response model including 20 limitations provided greater information than the dichotomous two-parameter logistic model, though further omitting items from the graded response model led to loss of information. Conclusion: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey disability-related questions, mostly specifically activity limitations, provided a high degree of information distinguishing individuals with higher than average limitations on the latent continuum, but essentially zero resolution to distinguish individuals with low or average limitations. Future work may focus on developing items which better distinguish individuals at the “lower” end of the limitation spectrum.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/20503121211012253
work_keys_str_mv AT samuelwterman useofitemresponsetheorytoinvestigatedisabilityrelatedquestionsinthenationalhealthandnutritionexaminationsurvey
AT jamesfburke useofitemresponsetheorytoinvestigatedisabilityrelatedquestionsinthenationalhealthandnutritionexaminationsurvey
_version_ 1721455318889660416