Translation equations to compare ActiGraph GT3X and Actical accelerometers activity counts

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>This study aimed to develop a translation equation to enable comparison between Actical and ActiGraph GT3X accelerometer counts recorded minute by minute.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Five males and five females of v...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Straker Leon, Campbell Amity
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2012-04-01
Series:BMC Medical Research Methodology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/12/54
id doaj-fb397e8f2bc1442c9d1607acea659ae1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fb397e8f2bc1442c9d1607acea659ae12020-11-24T22:16:23ZengBMCBMC Medical Research Methodology1471-22882012-04-011215410.1186/1471-2288-12-54Translation equations to compare ActiGraph GT3X and Actical accelerometers activity countsStraker LeonCampbell Amity<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>This study aimed to develop a translation equation to enable comparison between Actical and ActiGraph GT3X accelerometer counts recorded minute by minute.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Five males and five females of variable height, weight, body mass index and age participated in this investigation. Participants simultaneously wore an Actical and an ActiGraph accelerometer for two days. Conversion algorithms and R<sup>2</sup> were calculated day by day for each subject between the omnidirectional Actical and three different ActiGraph (three-dimensional) outputs: 1) vertical direction, 2) combined vector, and 3) a custom vector. Three conversion algorithms suitable for minute/minute conversions were then calculated from the full data set.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The vertical ActiGraph activity counts demonstrated the closest relationship with the Actical, with consistent moderate to strong conversions using the algorithm: y = 0.905x, in the day by day data (R<sup>2</sup> range: 0.514 to 0.989 and average: 0.822) and full data set (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.865).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The Actical is most sensitive to accelerations in the vertical direction, and does not closely correlate with three-dimensional ActiGraph output. Minute by minute conversions between the Actical and ActiGraph vertical component can be confidently performed between data sets and might allow further synthesis of information between studies.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/12/54AccelerometryActicalActiGraphTranslation equations
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Straker Leon
Campbell Amity
spellingShingle Straker Leon
Campbell Amity
Translation equations to compare ActiGraph GT3X and Actical accelerometers activity counts
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Accelerometry
Actical
ActiGraph
Translation equations
author_facet Straker Leon
Campbell Amity
author_sort Straker Leon
title Translation equations to compare ActiGraph GT3X and Actical accelerometers activity counts
title_short Translation equations to compare ActiGraph GT3X and Actical accelerometers activity counts
title_full Translation equations to compare ActiGraph GT3X and Actical accelerometers activity counts
title_fullStr Translation equations to compare ActiGraph GT3X and Actical accelerometers activity counts
title_full_unstemmed Translation equations to compare ActiGraph GT3X and Actical accelerometers activity counts
title_sort translation equations to compare actigraph gt3x and actical accelerometers activity counts
publisher BMC
series BMC Medical Research Methodology
issn 1471-2288
publishDate 2012-04-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>This study aimed to develop a translation equation to enable comparison between Actical and ActiGraph GT3X accelerometer counts recorded minute by minute.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Five males and five females of variable height, weight, body mass index and age participated in this investigation. Participants simultaneously wore an Actical and an ActiGraph accelerometer for two days. Conversion algorithms and R<sup>2</sup> were calculated day by day for each subject between the omnidirectional Actical and three different ActiGraph (three-dimensional) outputs: 1) vertical direction, 2) combined vector, and 3) a custom vector. Three conversion algorithms suitable for minute/minute conversions were then calculated from the full data set.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The vertical ActiGraph activity counts demonstrated the closest relationship with the Actical, with consistent moderate to strong conversions using the algorithm: y = 0.905x, in the day by day data (R<sup>2</sup> range: 0.514 to 0.989 and average: 0.822) and full data set (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.865).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The Actical is most sensitive to accelerations in the vertical direction, and does not closely correlate with three-dimensional ActiGraph output. Minute by minute conversions between the Actical and ActiGraph vertical component can be confidently performed between data sets and might allow further synthesis of information between studies.</p>
topic Accelerometry
Actical
ActiGraph
Translation equations
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/12/54
work_keys_str_mv AT strakerleon translationequationstocompareactigraphgt3xandacticalaccelerometersactivitycounts
AT campbellamity translationequationstocompareactigraphgt3xandacticalaccelerometersactivitycounts
_version_ 1725790133696856064