Comparison of Four Methods for Vertical Extrapolation of Soil Moisture Contents from Surface to Deep Layers in an Alpine Area

The accurate estimation of moisture content in deep soil layers is usually difficult due to the associated costs, strong spatiotemporal variability, and nonlinear relationship between surface and deep moisture content, especially in alpine areas (where complications include extreme heterogeneity and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jinlin Li, Lanhui Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-08-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/8862
id doaj-fb480b9c2ca24b71bb380ee00ff6c5d4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fb480b9c2ca24b71bb380ee00ff6c5d42021-08-26T14:21:08ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502021-08-01138862886210.3390/su13168862Comparison of Four Methods for Vertical Extrapolation of Soil Moisture Contents from Surface to Deep Layers in an Alpine AreaJinlin Li0Lanhui Zhang1College of Geography and Environmental Science, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, ChinaKey Laboratory of West China’s Environmental System (Ministry of Education), College of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, ChinaThe accurate estimation of moisture content in deep soil layers is usually difficult due to the associated costs, strong spatiotemporal variability, and nonlinear relationship between surface and deep moisture content, especially in alpine areas (where complications include extreme heterogeneity and freeze-thaw processes). In an effort to identify the optimal method for this purpose, this study used measurements of soil moisture content at three depths (4, 10, and 20 cm) in the upper parts of the Babao River basin in the Qilian Mountains, Northwest China. These measurements were collected in the HiWATER (Heihe watershed allied telemetry experimental research) program to test four vertical extrapolation methods: exponential filtering (ExpF), linear regression (LR), support vector regression (SVR), and the application of a type of artificial neural network, the radial basis function (RBF). SVR provided the best predictions, in terms of the lowest root mean squared error and mean absolute error values, for the 10 and 20 cm layers from surface layer (4 cm) measurements. However, the data also confirmed that freeze-thawing is an important process in the study area, which makes the infiltration process more complex and highly variable over time. Thus, we compared the vertical extrapolation methods’ performance in each of the four periods with differing infiltration characteristics and found significant among-period differences in each case. However, SVR consistently provided the best estimates, and all methods provided better estimates for the 10 cm layer than for the 20 cm layer.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/8862soil moisturevertical extrapolation methodsalpine mountainous areafreeze-thawsupport vector regressionexponential filter
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jinlin Li
Lanhui Zhang
spellingShingle Jinlin Li
Lanhui Zhang
Comparison of Four Methods for Vertical Extrapolation of Soil Moisture Contents from Surface to Deep Layers in an Alpine Area
Sustainability
soil moisture
vertical extrapolation methods
alpine mountainous area
freeze-thaw
support vector regression
exponential filter
author_facet Jinlin Li
Lanhui Zhang
author_sort Jinlin Li
title Comparison of Four Methods for Vertical Extrapolation of Soil Moisture Contents from Surface to Deep Layers in an Alpine Area
title_short Comparison of Four Methods for Vertical Extrapolation of Soil Moisture Contents from Surface to Deep Layers in an Alpine Area
title_full Comparison of Four Methods for Vertical Extrapolation of Soil Moisture Contents from Surface to Deep Layers in an Alpine Area
title_fullStr Comparison of Four Methods for Vertical Extrapolation of Soil Moisture Contents from Surface to Deep Layers in an Alpine Area
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Four Methods for Vertical Extrapolation of Soil Moisture Contents from Surface to Deep Layers in an Alpine Area
title_sort comparison of four methods for vertical extrapolation of soil moisture contents from surface to deep layers in an alpine area
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2021-08-01
description The accurate estimation of moisture content in deep soil layers is usually difficult due to the associated costs, strong spatiotemporal variability, and nonlinear relationship between surface and deep moisture content, especially in alpine areas (where complications include extreme heterogeneity and freeze-thaw processes). In an effort to identify the optimal method for this purpose, this study used measurements of soil moisture content at three depths (4, 10, and 20 cm) in the upper parts of the Babao River basin in the Qilian Mountains, Northwest China. These measurements were collected in the HiWATER (Heihe watershed allied telemetry experimental research) program to test four vertical extrapolation methods: exponential filtering (ExpF), linear regression (LR), support vector regression (SVR), and the application of a type of artificial neural network, the radial basis function (RBF). SVR provided the best predictions, in terms of the lowest root mean squared error and mean absolute error values, for the 10 and 20 cm layers from surface layer (4 cm) measurements. However, the data also confirmed that freeze-thawing is an important process in the study area, which makes the infiltration process more complex and highly variable over time. Thus, we compared the vertical extrapolation methods’ performance in each of the four periods with differing infiltration characteristics and found significant among-period differences in each case. However, SVR consistently provided the best estimates, and all methods provided better estimates for the 10 cm layer than for the 20 cm layer.
topic soil moisture
vertical extrapolation methods
alpine mountainous area
freeze-thaw
support vector regression
exponential filter
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/8862
work_keys_str_mv AT jinlinli comparisonoffourmethodsforverticalextrapolationofsoilmoisturecontentsfromsurfacetodeeplayersinanalpinearea
AT lanhuizhang comparisonoffourmethodsforverticalextrapolationofsoilmoisturecontentsfromsurfacetodeeplayersinanalpinearea
_version_ 1721190001518051328