General Versus Spinal Anesthesia in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

PURPOSE:To compare efficacy and complications of spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).MATERIALS AND METHODS:In a prospective randomized study, 110 patients were randomly assigned into two groups for PCNL; group 1 (n = 52) underwent general anesthesia and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mehdi AkbartabarToori, Ali MousaviZadeh, Sadrollah Mehrabi, Farhad Mehrabi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences 2013-03-01
Series:Urology Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.urologyjournal.org/index.php/uj/article/view/1968/702
id doaj-fb5b82fb00744fc8a37a55c0e7b8fffa
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fb5b82fb00744fc8a37a55c0e7b8fffa2020-11-24T22:08:50ZengUrology and Nephrology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesUrology Journal1735-13081735-546X2013-03-01101756761General Versus Spinal Anesthesia in Percutaneous NephrolithotomyMehdi AkbartabarTooriAli MousaviZadehSadrollah MehrabiFarhad MehrabiPURPOSE:To compare efficacy and complications of spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).MATERIALS AND METHODS:In a prospective randomized study, 110 patients were randomly assigned into two groups for PCNL; group 1 (n = 52) underwent general anesthesia and group 2 (n = 58) received spinal anesthesia. In group 1, PCNL was performed using standard technique under general anesthesia. In group 2, spinal anesthesia was done by injecting bupivacaine and fentanyl in spinal space L4 in sitting position. Thereafter, a urethral catheter was placed in lithotomy position, head of the bed was tilted down for 5 to 10 minutes, and the level of anesthesia was checked. Then, PCNL was done by standard technique. Complications were recorded and analyzed by SPSS software using Chi-Square and Student’s t tests.RESULTS: Mean stone size in groups 1 and 2 was 34.2 ± 9.8 mm and 31.3 ± 7.9 mm, respectively. Intra-operative hypotension and postoperative headache and low back pain were more in spinal group than the general group with a significant difference (P< .05). No neurologic complication was observed in both groups. Need to narcotic medications on the day of operation in groups 1 and 2 was 12.4 ± 3.1 mg and 7.8 ± 2.3 mg of morphine sulphate, respectively (P = .03). The cost of anesthetic drugs was 23±3.7 US $ and 4.5 ± 1.3 US $ in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P = .001).CONCLUSION:Spinal anesthesia with combined bupivacaine and fentanyl is a safe, effective, and cost-effective method for performing PCNL in adult patients. http://www.urologyjournal.org/index.php/uj/article/view/1968/702percutaneous nephrolithotomyanesthesiacomplications
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mehdi AkbartabarToori
Ali MousaviZadeh
Sadrollah Mehrabi
Farhad Mehrabi
spellingShingle Mehdi AkbartabarToori
Ali MousaviZadeh
Sadrollah Mehrabi
Farhad Mehrabi
General Versus Spinal Anesthesia in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
Urology Journal
percutaneous nephrolithotomy
anesthesia
complications
author_facet Mehdi AkbartabarToori
Ali MousaviZadeh
Sadrollah Mehrabi
Farhad Mehrabi
author_sort Mehdi AkbartabarToori
title General Versus Spinal Anesthesia in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
title_short General Versus Spinal Anesthesia in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
title_full General Versus Spinal Anesthesia in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
title_fullStr General Versus Spinal Anesthesia in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
title_full_unstemmed General Versus Spinal Anesthesia in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
title_sort general versus spinal anesthesia in percutaneous nephrolithotomy
publisher Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
series Urology Journal
issn 1735-1308
1735-546X
publishDate 2013-03-01
description PURPOSE:To compare efficacy and complications of spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).MATERIALS AND METHODS:In a prospective randomized study, 110 patients were randomly assigned into two groups for PCNL; group 1 (n = 52) underwent general anesthesia and group 2 (n = 58) received spinal anesthesia. In group 1, PCNL was performed using standard technique under general anesthesia. In group 2, spinal anesthesia was done by injecting bupivacaine and fentanyl in spinal space L4 in sitting position. Thereafter, a urethral catheter was placed in lithotomy position, head of the bed was tilted down for 5 to 10 minutes, and the level of anesthesia was checked. Then, PCNL was done by standard technique. Complications were recorded and analyzed by SPSS software using Chi-Square and Student’s t tests.RESULTS: Mean stone size in groups 1 and 2 was 34.2 ± 9.8 mm and 31.3 ± 7.9 mm, respectively. Intra-operative hypotension and postoperative headache and low back pain were more in spinal group than the general group with a significant difference (P< .05). No neurologic complication was observed in both groups. Need to narcotic medications on the day of operation in groups 1 and 2 was 12.4 ± 3.1 mg and 7.8 ± 2.3 mg of morphine sulphate, respectively (P = .03). The cost of anesthetic drugs was 23±3.7 US $ and 4.5 ± 1.3 US $ in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P = .001).CONCLUSION:Spinal anesthesia with combined bupivacaine and fentanyl is a safe, effective, and cost-effective method for performing PCNL in adult patients.
topic percutaneous nephrolithotomy
anesthesia
complications
url http://www.urologyjournal.org/index.php/uj/article/view/1968/702
work_keys_str_mv AT mehdiakbartabartoori generalversusspinalanesthesiainpercutaneousnephrolithotomy
AT alimousavizadeh generalversusspinalanesthesiainpercutaneousnephrolithotomy
AT sadrollahmehrabi generalversusspinalanesthesiainpercutaneousnephrolithotomy
AT farhadmehrabi generalversusspinalanesthesiainpercutaneousnephrolithotomy
_version_ 1725814505423765504