General Versus Spinal Anesthesia in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
PURPOSE:To compare efficacy and complications of spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).MATERIALS AND METHODS:In a prospective randomized study, 110 patients were randomly assigned into two groups for PCNL; group 1 (n = 52) underwent general anesthesia and...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
2013-03-01
|
Series: | Urology Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.urologyjournal.org/index.php/uj/article/view/1968/702 |
id |
doaj-fb5b82fb00744fc8a37a55c0e7b8fffa |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-fb5b82fb00744fc8a37a55c0e7b8fffa2020-11-24T22:08:50ZengUrology and Nephrology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesUrology Journal1735-13081735-546X2013-03-01101756761General Versus Spinal Anesthesia in Percutaneous NephrolithotomyMehdi AkbartabarTooriAli MousaviZadehSadrollah MehrabiFarhad MehrabiPURPOSE:To compare efficacy and complications of spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).MATERIALS AND METHODS:In a prospective randomized study, 110 patients were randomly assigned into two groups for PCNL; group 1 (n = 52) underwent general anesthesia and group 2 (n = 58) received spinal anesthesia. In group 1, PCNL was performed using standard technique under general anesthesia. In group 2, spinal anesthesia was done by injecting bupivacaine and fentanyl in spinal space L4 in sitting position. Thereafter, a urethral catheter was placed in lithotomy position, head of the bed was tilted down for 5 to 10 minutes, and the level of anesthesia was checked. Then, PCNL was done by standard technique. Complications were recorded and analyzed by SPSS software using Chi-Square and Student’s t tests.RESULTS: Mean stone size in groups 1 and 2 was 34.2 ± 9.8 mm and 31.3 ± 7.9 mm, respectively. Intra-operative hypotension and postoperative headache and low back pain were more in spinal group than the general group with a significant difference (P< .05). No neurologic complication was observed in both groups. Need to narcotic medications on the day of operation in groups 1 and 2 was 12.4 ± 3.1 mg and 7.8 ± 2.3 mg of morphine sulphate, respectively (P = .03). The cost of anesthetic drugs was 23±3.7 US $ and 4.5 ± 1.3 US $ in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P = .001).CONCLUSION:Spinal anesthesia with combined bupivacaine and fentanyl is a safe, effective, and cost-effective method for performing PCNL in adult patients. http://www.urologyjournal.org/index.php/uj/article/view/1968/702percutaneous nephrolithotomyanesthesiacomplications |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Mehdi AkbartabarToori Ali MousaviZadeh Sadrollah Mehrabi Farhad Mehrabi |
spellingShingle |
Mehdi AkbartabarToori Ali MousaviZadeh Sadrollah Mehrabi Farhad Mehrabi General Versus Spinal Anesthesia in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Urology Journal percutaneous nephrolithotomy anesthesia complications |
author_facet |
Mehdi AkbartabarToori Ali MousaviZadeh Sadrollah Mehrabi Farhad Mehrabi |
author_sort |
Mehdi AkbartabarToori |
title |
General Versus Spinal Anesthesia in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy |
title_short |
General Versus Spinal Anesthesia in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy |
title_full |
General Versus Spinal Anesthesia in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy |
title_fullStr |
General Versus Spinal Anesthesia in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy |
title_full_unstemmed |
General Versus Spinal Anesthesia in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy |
title_sort |
general versus spinal anesthesia in percutaneous nephrolithotomy |
publisher |
Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences |
series |
Urology Journal |
issn |
1735-1308 1735-546X |
publishDate |
2013-03-01 |
description |
PURPOSE:To compare efficacy and complications of spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).MATERIALS AND METHODS:In a prospective randomized study, 110 patients were randomly assigned into two groups for PCNL; group 1 (n = 52) underwent general anesthesia and group 2 (n = 58) received spinal anesthesia. In group 1, PCNL was performed using standard technique under general anesthesia. In group 2, spinal anesthesia was done by injecting bupivacaine and fentanyl in spinal space L4 in sitting position. Thereafter, a urethral catheter was placed in lithotomy position, head of the bed was tilted down for 5 to 10 minutes, and the level of anesthesia was checked. Then, PCNL was done by standard technique. Complications were recorded and analyzed by SPSS software using Chi-Square and Student’s t tests.RESULTS: Mean stone size in groups 1 and 2 was 34.2 ± 9.8 mm and 31.3 ± 7.9 mm, respectively. Intra-operative hypotension and postoperative headache and low back pain were more in spinal group than the general group with a significant difference (P< .05). No neurologic complication was observed in both groups. Need to narcotic medications on the day of operation in groups 1 and 2 was 12.4 ± 3.1 mg and 7.8 ± 2.3 mg of morphine sulphate, respectively (P = .03). The cost of anesthetic drugs was 23±3.7 US $ and 4.5 ± 1.3 US $ in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P = .001).CONCLUSION:Spinal anesthesia with combined bupivacaine and fentanyl is a safe, effective, and cost-effective method for performing PCNL in adult patients. |
topic |
percutaneous nephrolithotomy anesthesia complications |
url |
http://www.urologyjournal.org/index.php/uj/article/view/1968/702 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mehdiakbartabartoori generalversusspinalanesthesiainpercutaneousnephrolithotomy AT alimousavizadeh generalversusspinalanesthesiainpercutaneousnephrolithotomy AT sadrollahmehrabi generalversusspinalanesthesiainpercutaneousnephrolithotomy AT farhadmehrabi generalversusspinalanesthesiainpercutaneousnephrolithotomy |
_version_ |
1725814505423765504 |