Sagittal abdominal diameter and its socioeconomic correlates: perspective of sex differences

Abstract Background Sagittal abdominal diameter (SAD) is an anthropometric index associated with visceral adiposity. It remains unclear whether SAD and its socio-economic correlates differ in women and men, which limits the epidemiological and clinical applications of the SAD measurement. The aims o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chang Li, Marcelline Harris, Dennis Tsilimingras, Sophia Z. Liu, Ying Sheng, Xuefeng Liu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-03-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Subjects:
Sex
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09805-z
id doaj-fba40c0880004a7cad6a111308bbafad
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fba40c0880004a7cad6a111308bbafad2021-03-14T12:02:29ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582021-03-0121111010.1186/s12889-020-09805-zSagittal abdominal diameter and its socioeconomic correlates: perspective of sex differencesChang Li0Marcelline Harris1Dennis Tsilimingras2Sophia Z. Liu3Ying Sheng4Xuefeng Liu5Department of Systems, Population, and Leadership, University of Michigan School of NursingDepartment of Systems, Population, and Leadership, University of Michigan School of NursingDepartment of Family Medicine, Wayne State University School of MedicineDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan School of MedicineSchool of Nursing, Indiana UniversityDepartment of Systems, Population, and Leadership, University of Michigan School of NursingAbstract Background Sagittal abdominal diameter (SAD) is an anthropometric index associated with visceral adiposity. It remains unclear whether SAD and its socio-economic correlates differ in women and men, which limits the epidemiological and clinical applications of the SAD measurement. The aims of this study are to examine the sex differences in SAD and its socio-economic correlates. Methods A complex stratified multistage clustered sampling design was used to select 6975 men and 7079 women aged 18 years or more from the National Health Nutrition and Examination Survey 2011–2016, representative of the US civilian non-institutionalized population. SAD was measured in accordance to the standard protocols using a two-arm abdominal caliper. The sex differences in SAD and its socio-economic correlates were evaluated by performing weighted independent t tests and weighted multiple regression. Results SAD was lower in women than in men in the entire sample, as well as in all the subgroups characterized by age, race, birth place, household income, and body mass index except for non-Hispanic blacks and those with household income < $20,000. Adjusted for other characteristics, age, birth place, household income, and body mass index were associated with SAD in both women and men. Black women were associated with higher SAD then white women (p < .0001), and Hispanic and Asian men were associated with lower SAD than white men (both p < .01). Women born in other countries were more likely to have lower SAD than women born in the US (p < .0001), and so were men (p = .0118). Both women and men with a household income of <$75,000 had higher SAD than those with an income of over $75,000. The associations of age, race, and household income with SAD differed in women and men. Conclusion SAD is lower in women than in men, in the general population as well as in the most socio-economic subgroups. While socio-economic correlates of SAD are similar in women and men, the associations of age, race, and household income with SAD vary across sex.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09805-zSagittal abdominal diameterVisceral adipositySexWaist circumferenceAbdominal obesity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Chang Li
Marcelline Harris
Dennis Tsilimingras
Sophia Z. Liu
Ying Sheng
Xuefeng Liu
spellingShingle Chang Li
Marcelline Harris
Dennis Tsilimingras
Sophia Z. Liu
Ying Sheng
Xuefeng Liu
Sagittal abdominal diameter and its socioeconomic correlates: perspective of sex differences
BMC Public Health
Sagittal abdominal diameter
Visceral adiposity
Sex
Waist circumference
Abdominal obesity
author_facet Chang Li
Marcelline Harris
Dennis Tsilimingras
Sophia Z. Liu
Ying Sheng
Xuefeng Liu
author_sort Chang Li
title Sagittal abdominal diameter and its socioeconomic correlates: perspective of sex differences
title_short Sagittal abdominal diameter and its socioeconomic correlates: perspective of sex differences
title_full Sagittal abdominal diameter and its socioeconomic correlates: perspective of sex differences
title_fullStr Sagittal abdominal diameter and its socioeconomic correlates: perspective of sex differences
title_full_unstemmed Sagittal abdominal diameter and its socioeconomic correlates: perspective of sex differences
title_sort sagittal abdominal diameter and its socioeconomic correlates: perspective of sex differences
publisher BMC
series BMC Public Health
issn 1471-2458
publishDate 2021-03-01
description Abstract Background Sagittal abdominal diameter (SAD) is an anthropometric index associated with visceral adiposity. It remains unclear whether SAD and its socio-economic correlates differ in women and men, which limits the epidemiological and clinical applications of the SAD measurement. The aims of this study are to examine the sex differences in SAD and its socio-economic correlates. Methods A complex stratified multistage clustered sampling design was used to select 6975 men and 7079 women aged 18 years or more from the National Health Nutrition and Examination Survey 2011–2016, representative of the US civilian non-institutionalized population. SAD was measured in accordance to the standard protocols using a two-arm abdominal caliper. The sex differences in SAD and its socio-economic correlates were evaluated by performing weighted independent t tests and weighted multiple regression. Results SAD was lower in women than in men in the entire sample, as well as in all the subgroups characterized by age, race, birth place, household income, and body mass index except for non-Hispanic blacks and those with household income < $20,000. Adjusted for other characteristics, age, birth place, household income, and body mass index were associated with SAD in both women and men. Black women were associated with higher SAD then white women (p < .0001), and Hispanic and Asian men were associated with lower SAD than white men (both p < .01). Women born in other countries were more likely to have lower SAD than women born in the US (p < .0001), and so were men (p = .0118). Both women and men with a household income of <$75,000 had higher SAD than those with an income of over $75,000. The associations of age, race, and household income with SAD differed in women and men. Conclusion SAD is lower in women than in men, in the general population as well as in the most socio-economic subgroups. While socio-economic correlates of SAD are similar in women and men, the associations of age, race, and household income with SAD vary across sex.
topic Sagittal abdominal diameter
Visceral adiposity
Sex
Waist circumference
Abdominal obesity
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09805-z
work_keys_str_mv AT changli sagittalabdominaldiameteranditssocioeconomiccorrelatesperspectiveofsexdifferences
AT marcellineharris sagittalabdominaldiameteranditssocioeconomiccorrelatesperspectiveofsexdifferences
AT dennistsilimingras sagittalabdominaldiameteranditssocioeconomiccorrelatesperspectiveofsexdifferences
AT sophiazliu sagittalabdominaldiameteranditssocioeconomiccorrelatesperspectiveofsexdifferences
AT yingsheng sagittalabdominaldiameteranditssocioeconomiccorrelatesperspectiveofsexdifferences
AT xuefengliu sagittalabdominaldiameteranditssocioeconomiccorrelatesperspectiveofsexdifferences
_version_ 1724221752020566016