Long-term wind turbine noise exposure and the risk of incident atrial fibrillation in the Danish Nurse cohort

• Main Authors: Elvira V. Bräuner, Jeanette T. Jørgensen, Anne Katrine Duun-Henriksen, Claus Backalarz, Jens E. Laursen, Torben H. Pedersen, Mette K. Simonsen, Zorana J. Andersen
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier 2019-09-01
• Series: Environment International
• Online Access: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412019308852

Background: The potential health effects related to wind turbine noise (WTN) have received increased focus during the past decades, but evidence is sparse. We examined the association between long-term exposure to wind turbine noise and incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods: First ever hospital admission of AF amongst 28,731 female nurses in the Danish Nurse Cohort were identified in the Danish National Patient register until ultimo 2013. WTN levels at residential addresses between 1982 and 2013 were estimated using the Nord2000 noise propagation model, as the annual means of Lden, Lday, Levening and Lnight at the most exposed façade. Time-varying Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to examine the association between the 11-, 5- and 1-year rolling means of WTN levels and AF incidence. Results: 1430 nurses developed AF by end of follow-up in 2013. Mean (standard deviation) baseline residential noise levels amongst exposed nurses were 26.3 (6.7) dB and slightly higher in those who developed AF (27.3 (7.31) dB), than those who didn't (26.2 (6.6)). We observed a 30% statistically significant increased risk (95% CI: 1.05–1.61) of AF amongst nurses exposed to long-term (11-year running mean) WTN levels ≥20 dB(A) at night compared to nurses exposed to levels <20 dB(A). Similar effects were observed with day (HR 1.25; 95% CI: 1.01–1.54), and evening (HR 1.25; 95% CI: 1.01–1.54) noise levels. Conclusions: We found suggestive evidence of an association between long-term exposure to WTN and AF amongst female nurses. However, interpretation should be cautious as exposure levels were low.