A Hierarchical Model of Inhibitory Control
Inhibitory control describes the suppression of goal-irrelevant stimuli and behavioral responses. Current developmental taxonomies distinguish between Response Inhibition – the ability to suppress a prepotent motor response, and Attentional Inhibition – the ability to resist interference from distra...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018-08-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01339/full |
id |
doaj-fbb76fbdaf6d40f19c23d8f14deab04a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-fbb76fbdaf6d40f19c23d8f14deab04a2020-11-24T20:49:01ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782018-08-01910.3389/fpsyg.2018.01339391079A Hierarchical Model of Inhibitory ControlJeggan Tiego0Jeggan Tiego1Renee Testa2Renee Testa3Mark A. Bellgrove4Christos Pantelis5Christos Pantelis6Christos Pantelis7Sarah Whittle8Sarah Whittle9Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, AustraliaMelbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne & Melbourne Health, Carlton South, VIC, AustraliaMonash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, AustraliaMelbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne & Melbourne Health, Carlton South, VIC, AustraliaMonash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, AustraliaMelbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne & Melbourne Health, Carlton South, VIC, AustraliaFlorey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health, Parkville, VIC, AustraliaCentre for Neural Engineering, Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, AustraliaMelbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne & Melbourne Health, Carlton South, VIC, AustraliaMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, AustraliaInhibitory control describes the suppression of goal-irrelevant stimuli and behavioral responses. Current developmental taxonomies distinguish between Response Inhibition – the ability to suppress a prepotent motor response, and Attentional Inhibition – the ability to resist interference from distracting stimuli. Response Inhibition and Attentional Inhibition have exhibited moderately strong positive correlations in previous studies, suggesting they are closely related cognitive abilities. These results may reflect the use of cognitive tasks combining Stimulus–Stimulus- and Stimulus–Response-conflict as indicators of both constructs, which may have conflated their empirical association. Additionally, previous statistical modeling studies have not controlled for individual differences in Working Memory Capacity, which may account for some of the empirical overlap between Response Inhibition and Attentional Inhibition. The aim of the current study was to test a hierarchical model of inhibitory control that specifies Working Memory Capacity as a higher-order cognitive construct. Response Inhibition and Attentional Inhibition were conceptualized as lower-order cognitive mechanisms that should be empirically independent constructs apart from their shared reliance on Working Memory Capacity for active maintenance of goal-relevant representations. Measures of performance on modified stimulus–response compatibility tasks, complex memory span, and non-selective stopping tasks were obtained from 136 preadolescent children (M = 11 years, 10 months, SD = 8 months). Consistent with hypotheses, results from Structural Equation Modeling demonstrated that the Response Inhibition and Attentional Inhibition factors were empirically independent constructs that exhibited partial statistical dependence on the Working Memory Capacity factor. These findings have important implications for current theories and models of inhibitory control during development.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01339/fullinhibitory controlinhibitionresponse inhibitionattentional inhibitionworking memory capacity |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jeggan Tiego Jeggan Tiego Renee Testa Renee Testa Mark A. Bellgrove Christos Pantelis Christos Pantelis Christos Pantelis Sarah Whittle Sarah Whittle |
spellingShingle |
Jeggan Tiego Jeggan Tiego Renee Testa Renee Testa Mark A. Bellgrove Christos Pantelis Christos Pantelis Christos Pantelis Sarah Whittle Sarah Whittle A Hierarchical Model of Inhibitory Control Frontiers in Psychology inhibitory control inhibition response inhibition attentional inhibition working memory capacity |
author_facet |
Jeggan Tiego Jeggan Tiego Renee Testa Renee Testa Mark A. Bellgrove Christos Pantelis Christos Pantelis Christos Pantelis Sarah Whittle Sarah Whittle |
author_sort |
Jeggan Tiego |
title |
A Hierarchical Model of Inhibitory Control |
title_short |
A Hierarchical Model of Inhibitory Control |
title_full |
A Hierarchical Model of Inhibitory Control |
title_fullStr |
A Hierarchical Model of Inhibitory Control |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Hierarchical Model of Inhibitory Control |
title_sort |
hierarchical model of inhibitory control |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Psychology |
issn |
1664-1078 |
publishDate |
2018-08-01 |
description |
Inhibitory control describes the suppression of goal-irrelevant stimuli and behavioral responses. Current developmental taxonomies distinguish between Response Inhibition – the ability to suppress a prepotent motor response, and Attentional Inhibition – the ability to resist interference from distracting stimuli. Response Inhibition and Attentional Inhibition have exhibited moderately strong positive correlations in previous studies, suggesting they are closely related cognitive abilities. These results may reflect the use of cognitive tasks combining Stimulus–Stimulus- and Stimulus–Response-conflict as indicators of both constructs, which may have conflated their empirical association. Additionally, previous statistical modeling studies have not controlled for individual differences in Working Memory Capacity, which may account for some of the empirical overlap between Response Inhibition and Attentional Inhibition. The aim of the current study was to test a hierarchical model of inhibitory control that specifies Working Memory Capacity as a higher-order cognitive construct. Response Inhibition and Attentional Inhibition were conceptualized as lower-order cognitive mechanisms that should be empirically independent constructs apart from their shared reliance on Working Memory Capacity for active maintenance of goal-relevant representations. Measures of performance on modified stimulus–response compatibility tasks, complex memory span, and non-selective stopping tasks were obtained from 136 preadolescent children (M = 11 years, 10 months, SD = 8 months). Consistent with hypotheses, results from Structural Equation Modeling demonstrated that the Response Inhibition and Attentional Inhibition factors were empirically independent constructs that exhibited partial statistical dependence on the Working Memory Capacity factor. These findings have important implications for current theories and models of inhibitory control during development. |
topic |
inhibitory control inhibition response inhibition attentional inhibition working memory capacity |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01339/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jeggantiego ahierarchicalmodelofinhibitorycontrol AT jeggantiego ahierarchicalmodelofinhibitorycontrol AT reneetesta ahierarchicalmodelofinhibitorycontrol AT reneetesta ahierarchicalmodelofinhibitorycontrol AT markabellgrove ahierarchicalmodelofinhibitorycontrol AT christospantelis ahierarchicalmodelofinhibitorycontrol AT christospantelis ahierarchicalmodelofinhibitorycontrol AT christospantelis ahierarchicalmodelofinhibitorycontrol AT sarahwhittle ahierarchicalmodelofinhibitorycontrol AT sarahwhittle ahierarchicalmodelofinhibitorycontrol AT jeggantiego hierarchicalmodelofinhibitorycontrol AT jeggantiego hierarchicalmodelofinhibitorycontrol AT reneetesta hierarchicalmodelofinhibitorycontrol AT reneetesta hierarchicalmodelofinhibitorycontrol AT markabellgrove hierarchicalmodelofinhibitorycontrol AT christospantelis hierarchicalmodelofinhibitorycontrol AT christospantelis hierarchicalmodelofinhibitorycontrol AT christospantelis hierarchicalmodelofinhibitorycontrol AT sarahwhittle hierarchicalmodelofinhibitorycontrol AT sarahwhittle hierarchicalmodelofinhibitorycontrol |
_version_ |
1716807058310823936 |