A Hierarchical Model of Inhibitory Control

Inhibitory control describes the suppression of goal-irrelevant stimuli and behavioral responses. Current developmental taxonomies distinguish between Response Inhibition – the ability to suppress a prepotent motor response, and Attentional Inhibition – the ability to resist interference from distra...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jeggan Tiego, Renee Testa, Mark A. Bellgrove, Christos Pantelis, Sarah Whittle
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01339/full
id doaj-fbb76fbdaf6d40f19c23d8f14deab04a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fbb76fbdaf6d40f19c23d8f14deab04a2020-11-24T20:49:01ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782018-08-01910.3389/fpsyg.2018.01339391079A Hierarchical Model of Inhibitory ControlJeggan Tiego0Jeggan Tiego1Renee Testa2Renee Testa3Mark A. Bellgrove4Christos Pantelis5Christos Pantelis6Christos Pantelis7Sarah Whittle8Sarah Whittle9Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, AustraliaMelbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne & Melbourne Health, Carlton South, VIC, AustraliaMonash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, AustraliaMelbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne & Melbourne Health, Carlton South, VIC, AustraliaMonash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, AustraliaMelbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne & Melbourne Health, Carlton South, VIC, AustraliaFlorey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health, Parkville, VIC, AustraliaCentre for Neural Engineering, Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, AustraliaMelbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne & Melbourne Health, Carlton South, VIC, AustraliaMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, AustraliaInhibitory control describes the suppression of goal-irrelevant stimuli and behavioral responses. Current developmental taxonomies distinguish between Response Inhibition – the ability to suppress a prepotent motor response, and Attentional Inhibition – the ability to resist interference from distracting stimuli. Response Inhibition and Attentional Inhibition have exhibited moderately strong positive correlations in previous studies, suggesting they are closely related cognitive abilities. These results may reflect the use of cognitive tasks combining Stimulus–Stimulus- and Stimulus–Response-conflict as indicators of both constructs, which may have conflated their empirical association. Additionally, previous statistical modeling studies have not controlled for individual differences in Working Memory Capacity, which may account for some of the empirical overlap between Response Inhibition and Attentional Inhibition. The aim of the current study was to test a hierarchical model of inhibitory control that specifies Working Memory Capacity as a higher-order cognitive construct. Response Inhibition and Attentional Inhibition were conceptualized as lower-order cognitive mechanisms that should be empirically independent constructs apart from their shared reliance on Working Memory Capacity for active maintenance of goal-relevant representations. Measures of performance on modified stimulus–response compatibility tasks, complex memory span, and non-selective stopping tasks were obtained from 136 preadolescent children (M = 11 years, 10 months, SD = 8 months). Consistent with hypotheses, results from Structural Equation Modeling demonstrated that the Response Inhibition and Attentional Inhibition factors were empirically independent constructs that exhibited partial statistical dependence on the Working Memory Capacity factor. These findings have important implications for current theories and models of inhibitory control during development.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01339/fullinhibitory controlinhibitionresponse inhibitionattentional inhibitionworking memory capacity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jeggan Tiego
Jeggan Tiego
Renee Testa
Renee Testa
Mark A. Bellgrove
Christos Pantelis
Christos Pantelis
Christos Pantelis
Sarah Whittle
Sarah Whittle
spellingShingle Jeggan Tiego
Jeggan Tiego
Renee Testa
Renee Testa
Mark A. Bellgrove
Christos Pantelis
Christos Pantelis
Christos Pantelis
Sarah Whittle
Sarah Whittle
A Hierarchical Model of Inhibitory Control
Frontiers in Psychology
inhibitory control
inhibition
response inhibition
attentional inhibition
working memory capacity
author_facet Jeggan Tiego
Jeggan Tiego
Renee Testa
Renee Testa
Mark A. Bellgrove
Christos Pantelis
Christos Pantelis
Christos Pantelis
Sarah Whittle
Sarah Whittle
author_sort Jeggan Tiego
title A Hierarchical Model of Inhibitory Control
title_short A Hierarchical Model of Inhibitory Control
title_full A Hierarchical Model of Inhibitory Control
title_fullStr A Hierarchical Model of Inhibitory Control
title_full_unstemmed A Hierarchical Model of Inhibitory Control
title_sort hierarchical model of inhibitory control
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2018-08-01
description Inhibitory control describes the suppression of goal-irrelevant stimuli and behavioral responses. Current developmental taxonomies distinguish between Response Inhibition – the ability to suppress a prepotent motor response, and Attentional Inhibition – the ability to resist interference from distracting stimuli. Response Inhibition and Attentional Inhibition have exhibited moderately strong positive correlations in previous studies, suggesting they are closely related cognitive abilities. These results may reflect the use of cognitive tasks combining Stimulus–Stimulus- and Stimulus–Response-conflict as indicators of both constructs, which may have conflated their empirical association. Additionally, previous statistical modeling studies have not controlled for individual differences in Working Memory Capacity, which may account for some of the empirical overlap between Response Inhibition and Attentional Inhibition. The aim of the current study was to test a hierarchical model of inhibitory control that specifies Working Memory Capacity as a higher-order cognitive construct. Response Inhibition and Attentional Inhibition were conceptualized as lower-order cognitive mechanisms that should be empirically independent constructs apart from their shared reliance on Working Memory Capacity for active maintenance of goal-relevant representations. Measures of performance on modified stimulus–response compatibility tasks, complex memory span, and non-selective stopping tasks were obtained from 136 preadolescent children (M = 11 years, 10 months, SD = 8 months). Consistent with hypotheses, results from Structural Equation Modeling demonstrated that the Response Inhibition and Attentional Inhibition factors were empirically independent constructs that exhibited partial statistical dependence on the Working Memory Capacity factor. These findings have important implications for current theories and models of inhibitory control during development.
topic inhibitory control
inhibition
response inhibition
attentional inhibition
working memory capacity
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01339/full
work_keys_str_mv AT jeggantiego ahierarchicalmodelofinhibitorycontrol
AT jeggantiego ahierarchicalmodelofinhibitorycontrol
AT reneetesta ahierarchicalmodelofinhibitorycontrol
AT reneetesta ahierarchicalmodelofinhibitorycontrol
AT markabellgrove ahierarchicalmodelofinhibitorycontrol
AT christospantelis ahierarchicalmodelofinhibitorycontrol
AT christospantelis ahierarchicalmodelofinhibitorycontrol
AT christospantelis ahierarchicalmodelofinhibitorycontrol
AT sarahwhittle ahierarchicalmodelofinhibitorycontrol
AT sarahwhittle ahierarchicalmodelofinhibitorycontrol
AT jeggantiego hierarchicalmodelofinhibitorycontrol
AT jeggantiego hierarchicalmodelofinhibitorycontrol
AT reneetesta hierarchicalmodelofinhibitorycontrol
AT reneetesta hierarchicalmodelofinhibitorycontrol
AT markabellgrove hierarchicalmodelofinhibitorycontrol
AT christospantelis hierarchicalmodelofinhibitorycontrol
AT christospantelis hierarchicalmodelofinhibitorycontrol
AT christospantelis hierarchicalmodelofinhibitorycontrol
AT sarahwhittle hierarchicalmodelofinhibitorycontrol
AT sarahwhittle hierarchicalmodelofinhibitorycontrol
_version_ 1716807058310823936