Levetiracetam versus fosphenytoin as a second-line treatment after diazepam for status epilepticus: study protocol for a multicenter non-inferiority designed randomized control trial

Abstract Background Status epilepticus (SE) is an emergency condition for which rapid and secured cessation is important. Phenytoin and fosphenytoin, the prodrug of phenytoin with less severe adverse effects, have been recommended as second-line treatments. However, fosphenytoin causes severe advers...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kensuke Nakamura, Aiki Marushima, Yuji Takahashi, Akio Kimura, Masahiro Asami, Satoshi Egawa, Junya Kaneko, Yutaka Kondo, Chikara Yonekawa, Eisei Hoshiyama, Takeshi Yamada, Kazushi Maruo, Yoshiaki Inoue, IENE ECT with the LIFE study group
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-05-01
Series:Trials
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05269-7
id doaj-fc0337e786ca43afa70d51c2ce4f2bed
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fc0337e786ca43afa70d51c2ce4f2bed2021-05-09T11:30:02ZengBMCTrials1745-62152021-05-0122111010.1186/s13063-021-05269-7Levetiracetam versus fosphenytoin as a second-line treatment after diazepam for status epilepticus: study protocol for a multicenter non-inferiority designed randomized control trialKensuke Nakamura0Aiki Marushima1Yuji Takahashi2Akio Kimura3Masahiro Asami4Satoshi Egawa5Junya Kaneko6Yutaka Kondo7Chikara Yonekawa8Eisei Hoshiyama9Takeshi Yamada10Kazushi Maruo11Yoshiaki Inoue12IENE ECT with the LIFE study groupDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Hitachi General HospitalDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Tsukuba University HospitalDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Hitachi General HospitalDepartment of Emergency Medicine and Critical Care, National Center for Global Health and MedicineDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Teikyo University HospitalNeurointensive Care Unit, Neurosurgery, Stroke and Epilepsy Center, TMG Asaka Medical CenterDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nippon Medical School Tama Nagayama HospitalDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Juntendo University Urayasu HospitalDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Jichi medical University HospitalEmergency and Critical Care Medical Center, Dokkyo Medical UniversityTsukuba Clinical Research & Development Organization, University of TsukubaTsukuba Clinical Research & Development Organization, University of TsukubaDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Tsukuba University HospitalAbstract Background Status epilepticus (SE) is an emergency condition for which rapid and secured cessation is important. Phenytoin and fosphenytoin, the prodrug of phenytoin with less severe adverse effects, have been recommended as second-line treatments. However, fosphenytoin causes severe adverse events, such as hypotension and arrhythmia. Levetiracetam reportedly has similar efficacy and higher safety for SE; however, evidence to support its use for adult SE is lacking. In the present study, a non-inferiority designed multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) is being conducted to compare levetiracetam with fosphenytoin after diazepam as a second-line treatment for SE. Methods This multicenter, prospective, and open-label RCT is conducted in emergency departments. Between December 23, 2019, and March 31, 2023, 176 patients with convulsive SE transported to an emergency room will be randomized into a fosphenytoin group and levetiracetam group at a ratio of 1:1. The definition of SE is “continuous seizures longer than 5 min or discrete seizures longer than 2 min with intervening consciousness disturbance.” In both groups, diazepam is initially administered at 1–20 mg, followed by intravenous fosphenytoin at 22.5 mg/kg or intravenous levetiracetam at 1000–3000 mg. The primary outcome is the seizure cessation rate within 30 min. Seizure recurrence within 24 h, severe adverse events, and intubation rate within 24 h are secondary outcomes. Discussion The present study was approved and conducted as an initiative study of the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine. If non-inferiority is identified, the society will pursue an application for the national health insurance coverage of levetiracetam for SE via a public knowledge-based application. Trial registration Japan Registry of Clinical Trials jRCTs031190160 . Registered on December 13, 2019https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05269-7EpilepsyFosphenytoinLevetiracetamPhenytoinSeizure
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kensuke Nakamura
Aiki Marushima
Yuji Takahashi
Akio Kimura
Masahiro Asami
Satoshi Egawa
Junya Kaneko
Yutaka Kondo
Chikara Yonekawa
Eisei Hoshiyama
Takeshi Yamada
Kazushi Maruo
Yoshiaki Inoue
IENE ECT with the LIFE study group
spellingShingle Kensuke Nakamura
Aiki Marushima
Yuji Takahashi
Akio Kimura
Masahiro Asami
Satoshi Egawa
Junya Kaneko
Yutaka Kondo
Chikara Yonekawa
Eisei Hoshiyama
Takeshi Yamada
Kazushi Maruo
Yoshiaki Inoue
IENE ECT with the LIFE study group
Levetiracetam versus fosphenytoin as a second-line treatment after diazepam for status epilepticus: study protocol for a multicenter non-inferiority designed randomized control trial
Trials
Epilepsy
Fosphenytoin
Levetiracetam
Phenytoin
Seizure
author_facet Kensuke Nakamura
Aiki Marushima
Yuji Takahashi
Akio Kimura
Masahiro Asami
Satoshi Egawa
Junya Kaneko
Yutaka Kondo
Chikara Yonekawa
Eisei Hoshiyama
Takeshi Yamada
Kazushi Maruo
Yoshiaki Inoue
IENE ECT with the LIFE study group
author_sort Kensuke Nakamura
title Levetiracetam versus fosphenytoin as a second-line treatment after diazepam for status epilepticus: study protocol for a multicenter non-inferiority designed randomized control trial
title_short Levetiracetam versus fosphenytoin as a second-line treatment after diazepam for status epilepticus: study protocol for a multicenter non-inferiority designed randomized control trial
title_full Levetiracetam versus fosphenytoin as a second-line treatment after diazepam for status epilepticus: study protocol for a multicenter non-inferiority designed randomized control trial
title_fullStr Levetiracetam versus fosphenytoin as a second-line treatment after diazepam for status epilepticus: study protocol for a multicenter non-inferiority designed randomized control trial
title_full_unstemmed Levetiracetam versus fosphenytoin as a second-line treatment after diazepam for status epilepticus: study protocol for a multicenter non-inferiority designed randomized control trial
title_sort levetiracetam versus fosphenytoin as a second-line treatment after diazepam for status epilepticus: study protocol for a multicenter non-inferiority designed randomized control trial
publisher BMC
series Trials
issn 1745-6215
publishDate 2021-05-01
description Abstract Background Status epilepticus (SE) is an emergency condition for which rapid and secured cessation is important. Phenytoin and fosphenytoin, the prodrug of phenytoin with less severe adverse effects, have been recommended as second-line treatments. However, fosphenytoin causes severe adverse events, such as hypotension and arrhythmia. Levetiracetam reportedly has similar efficacy and higher safety for SE; however, evidence to support its use for adult SE is lacking. In the present study, a non-inferiority designed multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) is being conducted to compare levetiracetam with fosphenytoin after diazepam as a second-line treatment for SE. Methods This multicenter, prospective, and open-label RCT is conducted in emergency departments. Between December 23, 2019, and March 31, 2023, 176 patients with convulsive SE transported to an emergency room will be randomized into a fosphenytoin group and levetiracetam group at a ratio of 1:1. The definition of SE is “continuous seizures longer than 5 min or discrete seizures longer than 2 min with intervening consciousness disturbance.” In both groups, diazepam is initially administered at 1–20 mg, followed by intravenous fosphenytoin at 22.5 mg/kg or intravenous levetiracetam at 1000–3000 mg. The primary outcome is the seizure cessation rate within 30 min. Seizure recurrence within 24 h, severe adverse events, and intubation rate within 24 h are secondary outcomes. Discussion The present study was approved and conducted as an initiative study of the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine. If non-inferiority is identified, the society will pursue an application for the national health insurance coverage of levetiracetam for SE via a public knowledge-based application. Trial registration Japan Registry of Clinical Trials jRCTs031190160 . Registered on December 13, 2019
topic Epilepsy
Fosphenytoin
Levetiracetam
Phenytoin
Seizure
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05269-7
work_keys_str_mv AT kensukenakamura levetiracetamversusfosphenytoinasasecondlinetreatmentafterdiazepamforstatusepilepticusstudyprotocolforamulticenternoninferioritydesignedrandomizedcontroltrial
AT aikimarushima levetiracetamversusfosphenytoinasasecondlinetreatmentafterdiazepamforstatusepilepticusstudyprotocolforamulticenternoninferioritydesignedrandomizedcontroltrial
AT yujitakahashi levetiracetamversusfosphenytoinasasecondlinetreatmentafterdiazepamforstatusepilepticusstudyprotocolforamulticenternoninferioritydesignedrandomizedcontroltrial
AT akiokimura levetiracetamversusfosphenytoinasasecondlinetreatmentafterdiazepamforstatusepilepticusstudyprotocolforamulticenternoninferioritydesignedrandomizedcontroltrial
AT masahiroasami levetiracetamversusfosphenytoinasasecondlinetreatmentafterdiazepamforstatusepilepticusstudyprotocolforamulticenternoninferioritydesignedrandomizedcontroltrial
AT satoshiegawa levetiracetamversusfosphenytoinasasecondlinetreatmentafterdiazepamforstatusepilepticusstudyprotocolforamulticenternoninferioritydesignedrandomizedcontroltrial
AT junyakaneko levetiracetamversusfosphenytoinasasecondlinetreatmentafterdiazepamforstatusepilepticusstudyprotocolforamulticenternoninferioritydesignedrandomizedcontroltrial
AT yutakakondo levetiracetamversusfosphenytoinasasecondlinetreatmentafterdiazepamforstatusepilepticusstudyprotocolforamulticenternoninferioritydesignedrandomizedcontroltrial
AT chikarayonekawa levetiracetamversusfosphenytoinasasecondlinetreatmentafterdiazepamforstatusepilepticusstudyprotocolforamulticenternoninferioritydesignedrandomizedcontroltrial
AT eiseihoshiyama levetiracetamversusfosphenytoinasasecondlinetreatmentafterdiazepamforstatusepilepticusstudyprotocolforamulticenternoninferioritydesignedrandomizedcontroltrial
AT takeshiyamada levetiracetamversusfosphenytoinasasecondlinetreatmentafterdiazepamforstatusepilepticusstudyprotocolforamulticenternoninferioritydesignedrandomizedcontroltrial
AT kazushimaruo levetiracetamversusfosphenytoinasasecondlinetreatmentafterdiazepamforstatusepilepticusstudyprotocolforamulticenternoninferioritydesignedrandomizedcontroltrial
AT yoshiakiinoue levetiracetamversusfosphenytoinasasecondlinetreatmentafterdiazepamforstatusepilepticusstudyprotocolforamulticenternoninferioritydesignedrandomizedcontroltrial
AT ieneectwiththelifestudygroup levetiracetamversusfosphenytoinasasecondlinetreatmentafterdiazepamforstatusepilepticusstudyprotocolforamulticenternoninferioritydesignedrandomizedcontroltrial
_version_ 1721454330769309696