Sustainable Test Methods for Construction Materials and Elements

The laboratory testing of the construction materials and elements is a subset of activities inherent in sustainable building materials engineering. Two questions arise regarding test methods used: the relation between test results and material behavior in actual conditions on the one hand, and the v...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ewa Szewczak, Agnieszka Winkler-Skalna, Lech Czarnecki
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-01-01
Series:Materials
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/13/3/606
id doaj-fc18c527bc014bf481689927f17797fe
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fc18c527bc014bf481689927f17797fe2020-11-25T01:33:22ZengMDPI AGMaterials1996-19442020-01-0113360610.3390/ma13030606ma13030606Sustainable Test Methods for Construction Materials and ElementsEwa Szewczak0Agnieszka Winkler-Skalna1Lech Czarnecki2Group of Testing Laboratories, Instytut Techniki Budowlanej, Filtrowa 1, 00-611 Warsaw, PolandThermal Physics, Acoustics and Environment Department, Instytut Techniki Budowlanej, Filtrowa 1, 00-611 Warsaw, PolandScientific Secretary, Instytut Techniki Budowlanej, Filtrowa 1, 00-611 Warsaw, PolandThe laboratory testing of the construction materials and elements is a subset of activities inherent in sustainable building materials engineering. Two questions arise regarding test methods used: the relation between test results and material behavior in actual conditions on the one hand, and the variability of results related to uncertainty on the other. The paper presents the analysis of the results and uncertainties of the simple two independent test examples (bond strength and tensile strength) in order to demonstrate discrepancies related to the ambiguous methods of estimating uncertainty and the consequences of using test methods when method suitability for conformity assessment has not been properly verified. Examples are the basis for opening discussion on the test methods development direction, which makes possible to consider them as ‘sustainable’. The authors address the negative impact of the lack of a complete test models taking into account proceeding with an uncertainty on erroneous assessment risks. Adverse effects can be minimized by creating test methods appropriate for the test’s purpose (e.g., initial or routine tests) and handling with uncontrolled uncertainty components. Sustainable test methods should ensure a balance between widely defined tests and evaluation costs and the material’s or building’s safety, reliability, and stability.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/13/3/606testing of building materialstest uncertaintyvalidation of test methodssustainable test methods
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ewa Szewczak
Agnieszka Winkler-Skalna
Lech Czarnecki
spellingShingle Ewa Szewczak
Agnieszka Winkler-Skalna
Lech Czarnecki
Sustainable Test Methods for Construction Materials and Elements
Materials
testing of building materials
test uncertainty
validation of test methods
sustainable test methods
author_facet Ewa Szewczak
Agnieszka Winkler-Skalna
Lech Czarnecki
author_sort Ewa Szewczak
title Sustainable Test Methods for Construction Materials and Elements
title_short Sustainable Test Methods for Construction Materials and Elements
title_full Sustainable Test Methods for Construction Materials and Elements
title_fullStr Sustainable Test Methods for Construction Materials and Elements
title_full_unstemmed Sustainable Test Methods for Construction Materials and Elements
title_sort sustainable test methods for construction materials and elements
publisher MDPI AG
series Materials
issn 1996-1944
publishDate 2020-01-01
description The laboratory testing of the construction materials and elements is a subset of activities inherent in sustainable building materials engineering. Two questions arise regarding test methods used: the relation between test results and material behavior in actual conditions on the one hand, and the variability of results related to uncertainty on the other. The paper presents the analysis of the results and uncertainties of the simple two independent test examples (bond strength and tensile strength) in order to demonstrate discrepancies related to the ambiguous methods of estimating uncertainty and the consequences of using test methods when method suitability for conformity assessment has not been properly verified. Examples are the basis for opening discussion on the test methods development direction, which makes possible to consider them as ‘sustainable’. The authors address the negative impact of the lack of a complete test models taking into account proceeding with an uncertainty on erroneous assessment risks. Adverse effects can be minimized by creating test methods appropriate for the test’s purpose (e.g., initial or routine tests) and handling with uncontrolled uncertainty components. Sustainable test methods should ensure a balance between widely defined tests and evaluation costs and the material’s or building’s safety, reliability, and stability.
topic testing of building materials
test uncertainty
validation of test methods
sustainable test methods
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/13/3/606
work_keys_str_mv AT ewaszewczak sustainabletestmethodsforconstructionmaterialsandelements
AT agnieszkawinklerskalna sustainabletestmethodsforconstructionmaterialsandelements
AT lechczarnecki sustainabletestmethodsforconstructionmaterialsandelements
_version_ 1725077649465802752