Adaptation and validation of the Berlin questionnaire of competence in evidence-based dentistry for dental students: a pilot study

Abstract Background The purpose of this pilot study was to create a valid and reliable set of assessment questions for examining Evidence-based Dentistry (EbD) knowledge. For this reason, we adapted and validated for dental students the Berlin Questionnaire (BQ), which assesses Evidence-based Medici...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Laura Imorde, Andreas Möltner, Maren Runschke, Tobias Weberschock, Stefan Rüttermann, Susanne Gerhardt-Szép
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-05-01
Series:BMC Medical Education
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12909-020-02053-0
id doaj-fc58d02e7ffa4853af4aa5803747e9ab
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fc58d02e7ffa4853af4aa5803747e9ab2020-11-25T03:55:37ZengBMCBMC Medical Education1472-69202020-05-0120111310.1186/s12909-020-02053-0Adaptation and validation of the Berlin questionnaire of competence in evidence-based dentistry for dental students: a pilot studyLaura Imorde0Andreas Möltner1Maren Runschke2Tobias Weberschock3Stefan Rüttermann4Susanne Gerhardt-Szép5Department of Operative Dentistry, Dental School (Carolinum), Goethe-University FrankfurtCenter of Excellence for Assessment in Medicine, University of HeidelbergDepartment of Operative Dentistry, Dental School (Carolinum), Goethe-University FrankfurtInstitute of General Practice, Goethe University FrankfurtDepartment of Operative Dentistry, Dental School (Carolinum), Goethe-University FrankfurtDepartment of Operative Dentistry, Dental School (Carolinum), Goethe-University FrankfurtAbstract Background The purpose of this pilot study was to create a valid and reliable set of assessment questions for examining Evidence-based Dentistry (EbD) knowledge. For this reason, we adapted and validated for dental students the Berlin Questionnaire (BQ), which assesses Evidence-based Medicine (EbM) abilities. Methods The Berlin Questionnaire was validated with medical residents. We adapted it for use in a dentistry setting. An expert panel reviewed the adapted BQ for content validity. A cross-sectional cohort representing four training levels (EbD-novice dental students, EbD-trained dental students, dentists, and EbM−/EbD-expert faculty) completed the questionnaire. A total of 140 participants comprised the validation set. Internal reliability, item difficulty and item discrimination were assessed. Construct validity was assessed by comparing the mean total scores of students to faculty and comparing proportions of students and faculty who passed each item. Results Among the 133 participants (52 EbD-novice dental students, 53 EbD-trained dental students, 12 dentists, and 16 EbM-/ EbD-expert faculty), a statistically significant (p < 0.001) difference was evident in the total score corresponding to the training level. The total score reliability and psychometric properties of items modified for discipline-specific content were acceptable. Cronbach’s alpha was 0.648. Conclusion The adapted Berlin Questionnaire is a reliable and valid instrument to assess competence in Evidence-based Dentistry in dental students. Future research will focus on refining the instrument further.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12909-020-02053-0Evidence-based medicineEvidence-based dentistryEvaluationDental practiceReliabilityQuestionnaire
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Laura Imorde
Andreas Möltner
Maren Runschke
Tobias Weberschock
Stefan Rüttermann
Susanne Gerhardt-Szép
spellingShingle Laura Imorde
Andreas Möltner
Maren Runschke
Tobias Weberschock
Stefan Rüttermann
Susanne Gerhardt-Szép
Adaptation and validation of the Berlin questionnaire of competence in evidence-based dentistry for dental students: a pilot study
BMC Medical Education
Evidence-based medicine
Evidence-based dentistry
Evaluation
Dental practice
Reliability
Questionnaire
author_facet Laura Imorde
Andreas Möltner
Maren Runschke
Tobias Weberschock
Stefan Rüttermann
Susanne Gerhardt-Szép
author_sort Laura Imorde
title Adaptation and validation of the Berlin questionnaire of competence in evidence-based dentistry for dental students: a pilot study
title_short Adaptation and validation of the Berlin questionnaire of competence in evidence-based dentistry for dental students: a pilot study
title_full Adaptation and validation of the Berlin questionnaire of competence in evidence-based dentistry for dental students: a pilot study
title_fullStr Adaptation and validation of the Berlin questionnaire of competence in evidence-based dentistry for dental students: a pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Adaptation and validation of the Berlin questionnaire of competence in evidence-based dentistry for dental students: a pilot study
title_sort adaptation and validation of the berlin questionnaire of competence in evidence-based dentistry for dental students: a pilot study
publisher BMC
series BMC Medical Education
issn 1472-6920
publishDate 2020-05-01
description Abstract Background The purpose of this pilot study was to create a valid and reliable set of assessment questions for examining Evidence-based Dentistry (EbD) knowledge. For this reason, we adapted and validated for dental students the Berlin Questionnaire (BQ), which assesses Evidence-based Medicine (EbM) abilities. Methods The Berlin Questionnaire was validated with medical residents. We adapted it for use in a dentistry setting. An expert panel reviewed the adapted BQ for content validity. A cross-sectional cohort representing four training levels (EbD-novice dental students, EbD-trained dental students, dentists, and EbM−/EbD-expert faculty) completed the questionnaire. A total of 140 participants comprised the validation set. Internal reliability, item difficulty and item discrimination were assessed. Construct validity was assessed by comparing the mean total scores of students to faculty and comparing proportions of students and faculty who passed each item. Results Among the 133 participants (52 EbD-novice dental students, 53 EbD-trained dental students, 12 dentists, and 16 EbM-/ EbD-expert faculty), a statistically significant (p < 0.001) difference was evident in the total score corresponding to the training level. The total score reliability and psychometric properties of items modified for discipline-specific content were acceptable. Cronbach’s alpha was 0.648. Conclusion The adapted Berlin Questionnaire is a reliable and valid instrument to assess competence in Evidence-based Dentistry in dental students. Future research will focus on refining the instrument further.
topic Evidence-based medicine
Evidence-based dentistry
Evaluation
Dental practice
Reliability
Questionnaire
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12909-020-02053-0
work_keys_str_mv AT lauraimorde adaptationandvalidationoftheberlinquestionnaireofcompetenceinevidencebaseddentistryfordentalstudentsapilotstudy
AT andreasmoltner adaptationandvalidationoftheberlinquestionnaireofcompetenceinevidencebaseddentistryfordentalstudentsapilotstudy
AT marenrunschke adaptationandvalidationoftheberlinquestionnaireofcompetenceinevidencebaseddentistryfordentalstudentsapilotstudy
AT tobiasweberschock adaptationandvalidationoftheberlinquestionnaireofcompetenceinevidencebaseddentistryfordentalstudentsapilotstudy
AT stefanruttermann adaptationandvalidationoftheberlinquestionnaireofcompetenceinevidencebaseddentistryfordentalstudentsapilotstudy
AT susannegerhardtszep adaptationandvalidationoftheberlinquestionnaireofcompetenceinevidencebaseddentistryfordentalstudentsapilotstudy
_version_ 1724469176185126912