The Directive 2006/24 declaration of invalidity and the consequences of metadata retention in the EU Member States: A Fundamental Rights Standards Approach

Purpose – The text deals with the recent case law of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) on the directive on the retention of data (metadata) by providers of electronic communications services for the purposes of investigation, detection and prosecution of serious crimes. The authors seek to clarify...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alessandra Silveira, Pedro Miguel Freitas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade de Brasília 2017-05-01
Series:Revista de Direito, Estado e Telecomunicações
Subjects:
Online Access:http://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/RDET/article/view/21513
id doaj-fc664dfa36cb462d91e4956534665efe
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fc664dfa36cb462d91e4956534665efe2020-11-24T21:07:20ZengUniversidade de BrasíliaRevista de Direito, Estado e Telecomunicações1984-97291984-81612017-05-0191476821513The Directive 2006/24 declaration of invalidity and the consequences of metadata retention in the EU Member States: A Fundamental Rights Standards ApproachAlessandra SilveiraPedro Miguel FreitasPurpose – The text deals with the recent case law of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) on the directive on the retention of data (metadata) by providers of electronic communications services for the purposes of investigation, detection and prosecution of serious crimes. The authors seek to clarify the implications of the declaration of invalidity of this European directive for the EU Member States, towards the protection of legal equality of European citizens. Methodology/approach/design – The text was drafted while there was a pending ECJ’s response to the questions referred by two national courts (one Swedish and one British) on the effects of that invalidity decision on the domestic legislation that transposed it. Thus, the authors sought to anticipate the Court's decision in the light of its settled case law and the reaction of the Member States’ authorities’ after the declaration of invalidity of the referred directive. Findings – In the light of the particularities of the protection of fundamental rights in the EU and the legal model of integration, the authors draw some guidelines as to the procedure to be followed in future cases in order to safeguard the effectiveness of the Union law, namely when it comes to the legal equality of European citizens.http://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/RDET/article/view/21513conservation of dataelectronic communicationsfundamental rightsEuropean Union law
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alessandra Silveira
Pedro Miguel Freitas
spellingShingle Alessandra Silveira
Pedro Miguel Freitas
The Directive 2006/24 declaration of invalidity and the consequences of metadata retention in the EU Member States: A Fundamental Rights Standards Approach
Revista de Direito, Estado e Telecomunicações
conservation of data
electronic communications
fundamental rights
European Union law
author_facet Alessandra Silveira
Pedro Miguel Freitas
author_sort Alessandra Silveira
title The Directive 2006/24 declaration of invalidity and the consequences of metadata retention in the EU Member States: A Fundamental Rights Standards Approach
title_short The Directive 2006/24 declaration of invalidity and the consequences of metadata retention in the EU Member States: A Fundamental Rights Standards Approach
title_full The Directive 2006/24 declaration of invalidity and the consequences of metadata retention in the EU Member States: A Fundamental Rights Standards Approach
title_fullStr The Directive 2006/24 declaration of invalidity and the consequences of metadata retention in the EU Member States: A Fundamental Rights Standards Approach
title_full_unstemmed The Directive 2006/24 declaration of invalidity and the consequences of metadata retention in the EU Member States: A Fundamental Rights Standards Approach
title_sort directive 2006/24 declaration of invalidity and the consequences of metadata retention in the eu member states: a fundamental rights standards approach
publisher Universidade de Brasília
series Revista de Direito, Estado e Telecomunicações
issn 1984-9729
1984-8161
publishDate 2017-05-01
description Purpose – The text deals with the recent case law of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) on the directive on the retention of data (metadata) by providers of electronic communications services for the purposes of investigation, detection and prosecution of serious crimes. The authors seek to clarify the implications of the declaration of invalidity of this European directive for the EU Member States, towards the protection of legal equality of European citizens. Methodology/approach/design – The text was drafted while there was a pending ECJ’s response to the questions referred by two national courts (one Swedish and one British) on the effects of that invalidity decision on the domestic legislation that transposed it. Thus, the authors sought to anticipate the Court's decision in the light of its settled case law and the reaction of the Member States’ authorities’ after the declaration of invalidity of the referred directive. Findings – In the light of the particularities of the protection of fundamental rights in the EU and the legal model of integration, the authors draw some guidelines as to the procedure to be followed in future cases in order to safeguard the effectiveness of the Union law, namely when it comes to the legal equality of European citizens.
topic conservation of data
electronic communications
fundamental rights
European Union law
url http://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/RDET/article/view/21513
work_keys_str_mv AT alessandrasilveira thedirective200624declarationofinvalidityandtheconsequencesofmetadataretentionintheeumemberstatesafundamentalrightsstandardsapproach
AT pedromiguelfreitas thedirective200624declarationofinvalidityandtheconsequencesofmetadataretentionintheeumemberstatesafundamentalrightsstandardsapproach
AT alessandrasilveira directive200624declarationofinvalidityandtheconsequencesofmetadataretentionintheeumemberstatesafundamentalrightsstandardsapproach
AT pedromiguelfreitas directive200624declarationofinvalidityandtheconsequencesofmetadataretentionintheeumemberstatesafundamentalrightsstandardsapproach
_version_ 1716763300354588672