Is fludeoxyglucose-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography ( 18 F-FDG-PET/CT) really useless in staging pulmonary carcinoid tumors and in discriminating histological subtypes? Controversial points and future perspectives
Main Authors: | Filippo Lococo, Alessandro Stefani, Giorgio Treglia |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2015-01-01
|
Series: | Annals of Thoracic Medicine |
Online Access: | http://www.thoracicmedicine.org/article.asp?issn=1817-1737;year=2015;volume=10;issue=3;spage=217;epage=218;aulast=Lococo |
Similar Items
-
The Role of Fluorine-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in Aggressive Histological Subtypes of Thyroid Cancer: An Overview
by: Giorgio Treglia, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01) -
18F-fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography computed tomography-guided diagnosis of prostatic and leptomeningeal tuberculosis
by: Madhuri Shimpi Mahajan, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01) -
Characteristics of malignant thyroid lesions on [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-Positron emission tomography (PET)/Computed tomography (CT)
by: Hatem Nasr, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01) -
False-positive 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography–computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) scans mimicking malignancies
by: Zehra Yasar, et al.
Published: (2015-02-01) -
Rapid progression of carcinoma en cuirasse breast dermal metastases on18F-fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography–computed tomography
by: Colin Raymond Young, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)