Dentine Surface Morphology after Chlorhexidine Application—SEM Study

Chlorhexidine (CHX) is a widely known and a very popular antibacterial agent that decreases the level of cariogenic bacteria. CHX applied on the cavity surface of dentine may influence adhesive bond strength. The aim of the study was to evaluate the dentine surface after different chlorhexidine digl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Barbara Lapinska, Leszek Klimek, Jerzy Sokolowski, Monika Lukomska-Szymanska
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-08-01
Series:Polymers
Subjects:
SEM
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/10/8/905
id doaj-fc8d699d84fc47f29fe1f625d2cc672b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fc8d699d84fc47f29fe1f625d2cc672b2020-11-25T01:41:02ZengMDPI AGPolymers2073-43602018-08-0110890510.3390/polym10080905polym10080905Dentine Surface Morphology after Chlorhexidine Application—SEM StudyBarbara Lapinska0Leszek Klimek1Jerzy Sokolowski2Monika Lukomska-Szymanska3Department of General Dentistry, Medical University of Lodz, 92-213 Lodz, PolandDepartment of Dental Technology, Medical University of Lodz, 92-213 Lodz, PolandDepartment of General Dentistry, Medical University of Lodz, 92-213 Lodz, PolandDepartment of General Dentistry, Medical University of Lodz, 92-213 Lodz, PolandChlorhexidine (CHX) is a widely known and a very popular antibacterial agent that decreases the level of cariogenic bacteria. CHX applied on the cavity surface of dentine may influence adhesive bond strength. The aim of the study was to evaluate the dentine surface after different chlorhexidine digluconate (CHG) application protocols. Different CHG application protocols were introduced. A concentration of 0.2% or 2.0% CHG was applied on the etched or unetched dentine surface for 15 or 30 s, then water rinsed or drained. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observations and energy disperse spectrometer (EDS) analysis of the dentine surfaces were performed. The application of 0.2% CHG for 15 s, followed by draining, on either etched or unetched dentine surface effectively removed the smear layer, leaving the surface enriched with CHG deposits. Conclusions: The concentration of CHG and its application time influenced the amount of CHG deposits and the degree of smear layer removal from the dentine surface.http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/10/8/905dentinechlorhexidineSEMadhesionsurface
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Barbara Lapinska
Leszek Klimek
Jerzy Sokolowski
Monika Lukomska-Szymanska
spellingShingle Barbara Lapinska
Leszek Klimek
Jerzy Sokolowski
Monika Lukomska-Szymanska
Dentine Surface Morphology after Chlorhexidine Application—SEM Study
Polymers
dentine
chlorhexidine
SEM
adhesion
surface
author_facet Barbara Lapinska
Leszek Klimek
Jerzy Sokolowski
Monika Lukomska-Szymanska
author_sort Barbara Lapinska
title Dentine Surface Morphology after Chlorhexidine Application—SEM Study
title_short Dentine Surface Morphology after Chlorhexidine Application—SEM Study
title_full Dentine Surface Morphology after Chlorhexidine Application—SEM Study
title_fullStr Dentine Surface Morphology after Chlorhexidine Application—SEM Study
title_full_unstemmed Dentine Surface Morphology after Chlorhexidine Application—SEM Study
title_sort dentine surface morphology after chlorhexidine application—sem study
publisher MDPI AG
series Polymers
issn 2073-4360
publishDate 2018-08-01
description Chlorhexidine (CHX) is a widely known and a very popular antibacterial agent that decreases the level of cariogenic bacteria. CHX applied on the cavity surface of dentine may influence adhesive bond strength. The aim of the study was to evaluate the dentine surface after different chlorhexidine digluconate (CHG) application protocols. Different CHG application protocols were introduced. A concentration of 0.2% or 2.0% CHG was applied on the etched or unetched dentine surface for 15 or 30 s, then water rinsed or drained. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observations and energy disperse spectrometer (EDS) analysis of the dentine surfaces were performed. The application of 0.2% CHG for 15 s, followed by draining, on either etched or unetched dentine surface effectively removed the smear layer, leaving the surface enriched with CHG deposits. Conclusions: The concentration of CHG and its application time influenced the amount of CHG deposits and the degree of smear layer removal from the dentine surface.
topic dentine
chlorhexidine
SEM
adhesion
surface
url http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/10/8/905
work_keys_str_mv AT barbaralapinska dentinesurfacemorphologyafterchlorhexidineapplicationsemstudy
AT leszekklimek dentinesurfacemorphologyafterchlorhexidineapplicationsemstudy
AT jerzysokolowski dentinesurfacemorphologyafterchlorhexidineapplicationsemstudy
AT monikalukomskaszymanska dentinesurfacemorphologyafterchlorhexidineapplicationsemstudy
_version_ 1725042934336716800