Dentine Surface Morphology after Chlorhexidine Application—SEM Study
Chlorhexidine (CHX) is a widely known and a very popular antibacterial agent that decreases the level of cariogenic bacteria. CHX applied on the cavity surface of dentine may influence adhesive bond strength. The aim of the study was to evaluate the dentine surface after different chlorhexidine digl...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2018-08-01
|
Series: | Polymers |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/10/8/905 |
id |
doaj-fc8d699d84fc47f29fe1f625d2cc672b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-fc8d699d84fc47f29fe1f625d2cc672b2020-11-25T01:41:02ZengMDPI AGPolymers2073-43602018-08-0110890510.3390/polym10080905polym10080905Dentine Surface Morphology after Chlorhexidine Application—SEM StudyBarbara Lapinska0Leszek Klimek1Jerzy Sokolowski2Monika Lukomska-Szymanska3Department of General Dentistry, Medical University of Lodz, 92-213 Lodz, PolandDepartment of Dental Technology, Medical University of Lodz, 92-213 Lodz, PolandDepartment of General Dentistry, Medical University of Lodz, 92-213 Lodz, PolandDepartment of General Dentistry, Medical University of Lodz, 92-213 Lodz, PolandChlorhexidine (CHX) is a widely known and a very popular antibacterial agent that decreases the level of cariogenic bacteria. CHX applied on the cavity surface of dentine may influence adhesive bond strength. The aim of the study was to evaluate the dentine surface after different chlorhexidine digluconate (CHG) application protocols. Different CHG application protocols were introduced. A concentration of 0.2% or 2.0% CHG was applied on the etched or unetched dentine surface for 15 or 30 s, then water rinsed or drained. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observations and energy disperse spectrometer (EDS) analysis of the dentine surfaces were performed. The application of 0.2% CHG for 15 s, followed by draining, on either etched or unetched dentine surface effectively removed the smear layer, leaving the surface enriched with CHG deposits. Conclusions: The concentration of CHG and its application time influenced the amount of CHG deposits and the degree of smear layer removal from the dentine surface.http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/10/8/905dentinechlorhexidineSEMadhesionsurface |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Barbara Lapinska Leszek Klimek Jerzy Sokolowski Monika Lukomska-Szymanska |
spellingShingle |
Barbara Lapinska Leszek Klimek Jerzy Sokolowski Monika Lukomska-Szymanska Dentine Surface Morphology after Chlorhexidine Application—SEM Study Polymers dentine chlorhexidine SEM adhesion surface |
author_facet |
Barbara Lapinska Leszek Klimek Jerzy Sokolowski Monika Lukomska-Szymanska |
author_sort |
Barbara Lapinska |
title |
Dentine Surface Morphology after Chlorhexidine Application—SEM Study |
title_short |
Dentine Surface Morphology after Chlorhexidine Application—SEM Study |
title_full |
Dentine Surface Morphology after Chlorhexidine Application—SEM Study |
title_fullStr |
Dentine Surface Morphology after Chlorhexidine Application—SEM Study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Dentine Surface Morphology after Chlorhexidine Application—SEM Study |
title_sort |
dentine surface morphology after chlorhexidine application—sem study |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Polymers |
issn |
2073-4360 |
publishDate |
2018-08-01 |
description |
Chlorhexidine (CHX) is a widely known and a very popular antibacterial agent that decreases the level of cariogenic bacteria. CHX applied on the cavity surface of dentine may influence adhesive bond strength. The aim of the study was to evaluate the dentine surface after different chlorhexidine digluconate (CHG) application protocols. Different CHG application protocols were introduced. A concentration of 0.2% or 2.0% CHG was applied on the etched or unetched dentine surface for 15 or 30 s, then water rinsed or drained. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observations and energy disperse spectrometer (EDS) analysis of the dentine surfaces were performed. The application of 0.2% CHG for 15 s, followed by draining, on either etched or unetched dentine surface effectively removed the smear layer, leaving the surface enriched with CHG deposits. Conclusions: The concentration of CHG and its application time influenced the amount of CHG deposits and the degree of smear layer removal from the dentine surface. |
topic |
dentine chlorhexidine SEM adhesion surface |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/10/8/905 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT barbaralapinska dentinesurfacemorphologyafterchlorhexidineapplicationsemstudy AT leszekklimek dentinesurfacemorphologyafterchlorhexidineapplicationsemstudy AT jerzysokolowski dentinesurfacemorphologyafterchlorhexidineapplicationsemstudy AT monikalukomskaszymanska dentinesurfacemorphologyafterchlorhexidineapplicationsemstudy |
_version_ |
1725042934336716800 |