Time pressure modulates electrophysiological correlates of early visual processing.

BACKGROUND: Reactions to sensory events sometimes require quick responses whereas at other times they require a high degree of accuracy-usually resulting in slower responses. It is important to understand whether visual processing under different response speed requirements employs different neural...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ingo Fründ, Niko A Busch, Jeanette Schadow, Thomas Gruber, Ursula Körner, Christoph S Herrmann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2008-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2243021?pdf=render
id doaj-fcc2bc1901b44b8abb11cbc00f3d83b1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fcc2bc1901b44b8abb11cbc00f3d83b12020-11-25T02:20:05ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032008-01-0132e167510.1371/journal.pone.0001675Time pressure modulates electrophysiological correlates of early visual processing.Ingo FründNiko A BuschJeanette SchadowThomas GruberUrsula KörnerChristoph S HerrmannBACKGROUND: Reactions to sensory events sometimes require quick responses whereas at other times they require a high degree of accuracy-usually resulting in slower responses. It is important to understand whether visual processing under different response speed requirements employs different neural mechanisms. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We asked participants to classify visual patterns with different levels of detail as real-world or non-sense objects. In one condition, participants were to respond immediately, whereas in the other they responded after a delay of 1 second. As expected, participants performed more accurately in delayed response trials. This effect was pronounced for stimuli with a high level of detail. These behavioral effects were accompanied by modulations of stimulus related EEG gamma oscillations which are an electrophysiological correlate of early visual processing. In trials requiring speeded responses, early stimulus-locked oscillations discriminated real-world and non-sense objects irrespective of the level of detail. For stimuli with a higher level of detail, oscillatory power in a later time window discriminated real-world and non-sense objects irrespective of response speed requirements. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Thus, it seems plausible to assume that different response speed requirements trigger different dynamics of processing.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2243021?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ingo Fründ
Niko A Busch
Jeanette Schadow
Thomas Gruber
Ursula Körner
Christoph S Herrmann
spellingShingle Ingo Fründ
Niko A Busch
Jeanette Schadow
Thomas Gruber
Ursula Körner
Christoph S Herrmann
Time pressure modulates electrophysiological correlates of early visual processing.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Ingo Fründ
Niko A Busch
Jeanette Schadow
Thomas Gruber
Ursula Körner
Christoph S Herrmann
author_sort Ingo Fründ
title Time pressure modulates electrophysiological correlates of early visual processing.
title_short Time pressure modulates electrophysiological correlates of early visual processing.
title_full Time pressure modulates electrophysiological correlates of early visual processing.
title_fullStr Time pressure modulates electrophysiological correlates of early visual processing.
title_full_unstemmed Time pressure modulates electrophysiological correlates of early visual processing.
title_sort time pressure modulates electrophysiological correlates of early visual processing.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2008-01-01
description BACKGROUND: Reactions to sensory events sometimes require quick responses whereas at other times they require a high degree of accuracy-usually resulting in slower responses. It is important to understand whether visual processing under different response speed requirements employs different neural mechanisms. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We asked participants to classify visual patterns with different levels of detail as real-world or non-sense objects. In one condition, participants were to respond immediately, whereas in the other they responded after a delay of 1 second. As expected, participants performed more accurately in delayed response trials. This effect was pronounced for stimuli with a high level of detail. These behavioral effects were accompanied by modulations of stimulus related EEG gamma oscillations which are an electrophysiological correlate of early visual processing. In trials requiring speeded responses, early stimulus-locked oscillations discriminated real-world and non-sense objects irrespective of the level of detail. For stimuli with a higher level of detail, oscillatory power in a later time window discriminated real-world and non-sense objects irrespective of response speed requirements. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Thus, it seems plausible to assume that different response speed requirements trigger different dynamics of processing.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2243021?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT ingofrund timepressuremodulateselectrophysiologicalcorrelatesofearlyvisualprocessing
AT nikoabusch timepressuremodulateselectrophysiologicalcorrelatesofearlyvisualprocessing
AT jeanetteschadow timepressuremodulateselectrophysiologicalcorrelatesofearlyvisualprocessing
AT thomasgruber timepressuremodulateselectrophysiologicalcorrelatesofearlyvisualprocessing
AT ursulakorner timepressuremodulateselectrophysiologicalcorrelatesofearlyvisualprocessing
AT christophsherrmann timepressuremodulateselectrophysiologicalcorrelatesofearlyvisualprocessing
_version_ 1724873594587054080