A Framework for the Evaluation of SUMO-Based Ontologies Using WordNet

This paper offers a new practical approach toward automated commonsense reasoning with first-order logic (FOL) SUMO-based ontologies. We propose a new black-box evaluation framework for SUMO-based ontologies, which exploits the world knowledge encoded in WordNet and its mapping into SUMO. Our propos...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Javier Alvez, Paqui Lucio, German Rigau
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IEEE 2019-01-01
Series:IEEE Access
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8666637/
id doaj-fcd851710c5d476ca207eba2e5148bb7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fcd851710c5d476ca207eba2e5148bb72021-03-29T22:20:01ZengIEEEIEEE Access2169-35362019-01-017360753609310.1109/ACCESS.2019.29048358666637A Framework for the Evaluation of SUMO-Based Ontologies Using WordNetJavier Alvez0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8413-0854Paqui Lucio1German Rigau2Department of Computer Languages and Systems, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Donostia, SpainDepartment of Computer Languages and Systems, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Donostia, SpainDepartment of Computer Languages and Systems, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Donostia, SpainThis paper offers a new practical approach toward automated commonsense reasoning with first-order logic (FOL) SUMO-based ontologies. We propose a new black-box evaluation framework for SUMO-based ontologies, which exploits the world knowledge encoded in WordNet and its mapping into SUMO. Our proposal consists of both a novel semi-automatic method for the creation of a large set of commonsense problems and a new procedure that enables its automatic evaluation by using automated theorem provers (ATPs). The application of our method enables the creation of a very large benchmark consisting of more than 15 000 problems from a small set of manually built question patterns that exploit the WordNet semantic relations. By means of the resulting benchmark, we successfully evaluate the competency of different translations of SUMO into FOL and the performance of various state-of-the-art FOL ATPs according to several quality criteria. A general analysis of our experimental results demonstrates that the proposed commonsense problems are heterogeneous and non-trivial. Furthermore, a fine-grained analysis of the experimental results obtained for a sample of our benchmark enables the detection of some mapping errors and some discrepancies between the knowledge of WordNet and SUMO. The evaluation benchmark and all the resources that have been used and developed during this work are released in a single package.https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8666637/Ontology evaluationautomated reasoningcommonsense knowledgeWordNetSUMO
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Javier Alvez
Paqui Lucio
German Rigau
spellingShingle Javier Alvez
Paqui Lucio
German Rigau
A Framework for the Evaluation of SUMO-Based Ontologies Using WordNet
IEEE Access
Ontology evaluation
automated reasoning
commonsense knowledge
WordNet
SUMO
author_facet Javier Alvez
Paqui Lucio
German Rigau
author_sort Javier Alvez
title A Framework for the Evaluation of SUMO-Based Ontologies Using WordNet
title_short A Framework for the Evaluation of SUMO-Based Ontologies Using WordNet
title_full A Framework for the Evaluation of SUMO-Based Ontologies Using WordNet
title_fullStr A Framework for the Evaluation of SUMO-Based Ontologies Using WordNet
title_full_unstemmed A Framework for the Evaluation of SUMO-Based Ontologies Using WordNet
title_sort framework for the evaluation of sumo-based ontologies using wordnet
publisher IEEE
series IEEE Access
issn 2169-3536
publishDate 2019-01-01
description This paper offers a new practical approach toward automated commonsense reasoning with first-order logic (FOL) SUMO-based ontologies. We propose a new black-box evaluation framework for SUMO-based ontologies, which exploits the world knowledge encoded in WordNet and its mapping into SUMO. Our proposal consists of both a novel semi-automatic method for the creation of a large set of commonsense problems and a new procedure that enables its automatic evaluation by using automated theorem provers (ATPs). The application of our method enables the creation of a very large benchmark consisting of more than 15 000 problems from a small set of manually built question patterns that exploit the WordNet semantic relations. By means of the resulting benchmark, we successfully evaluate the competency of different translations of SUMO into FOL and the performance of various state-of-the-art FOL ATPs according to several quality criteria. A general analysis of our experimental results demonstrates that the proposed commonsense problems are heterogeneous and non-trivial. Furthermore, a fine-grained analysis of the experimental results obtained for a sample of our benchmark enables the detection of some mapping errors and some discrepancies between the knowledge of WordNet and SUMO. The evaluation benchmark and all the resources that have been used and developed during this work are released in a single package.
topic Ontology evaluation
automated reasoning
commonsense knowledge
WordNet
SUMO
url https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8666637/
work_keys_str_mv AT javieralvez aframeworkfortheevaluationofsumobasedontologiesusingwordnet
AT paquilucio aframeworkfortheevaluationofsumobasedontologiesusingwordnet
AT germanrigau aframeworkfortheevaluationofsumobasedontologiesusingwordnet
AT javieralvez frameworkfortheevaluationofsumobasedontologiesusingwordnet
AT paquilucio frameworkfortheevaluationofsumobasedontologiesusingwordnet
AT germanrigau frameworkfortheevaluationofsumobasedontologiesusingwordnet
_version_ 1724191914260955136