A quality of life questionnaire for patients with scapula alata (SA-Q): development and validation
Abstract Background No quality of life (QoL) questionnaire exists for patients with scapula alata (SA). The objective of this study was to develop and validate a QoL questionnaire for SA patients. Methods A team consisting of experts (n = 7) and SA patients (n = 7) developed, through five continuous...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2020-04-01
|
Series: | BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-020-03284-4 |
id |
doaj-fd0e49b4e5ab4dcab490e842b166b84b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-fd0e49b4e5ab4dcab490e842b166b84b2020-11-25T03:53:07ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742020-04-012111910.1186/s12891-020-03284-4A quality of life questionnaire for patients with scapula alata (SA-Q): development and validationSigrid Tibaek0Janne Gadsboell1Department of Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Copenhagen University HospitalDepartment of Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Copenhagen University HospitalAbstract Background No quality of life (QoL) questionnaire exists for patients with scapula alata (SA). The objective of this study was to develop and validate a QoL questionnaire for SA patients. Methods A team consisting of experts (n = 7) and SA patients (n = 7) developed, through five continuous phases, a QoL questionnaire for SA patients (SA-Q). The developed questionnaire consists of 21 items, grouped in five domains: physical symptoms (five items), work (four items), sport and leisure activities (four items), life style (four items) and emotions (four items). Content and face validity for the SA-Q questionnaire were evaluated by a sample of 48 (90%) out of 53 SA patients recruited from a university hospital. The Content Validity Index (CVI) and modified kappa index (κ*) assessed the relevance of SA-Q questionnaire. Results The SA patients evaluated 20 (95%) out of 21 items as excellent for content validity (I-CVI > 0.78, κ* > 0.74), one (5%) item was considered as good (I-CVI < 0.78, 0.60 < κ* < 0.74). The average scale (S-CVI/ave) for the entire SA-Q questionnaire was 0.93 indicating an excellent content validity. Conclusions This study presents the development and validation of content validity of the first QoL questionnaire for SA patients. The SA-Q questionnaire has potential clinical implications for detected changes concerning the different items during rehabilitation. Clinical trials Not relevant.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-020-03284-4Content validityScapula alata, QoL questionnaire |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Sigrid Tibaek Janne Gadsboell |
spellingShingle |
Sigrid Tibaek Janne Gadsboell A quality of life questionnaire for patients with scapula alata (SA-Q): development and validation BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Content validity Scapula alata, QoL questionnaire |
author_facet |
Sigrid Tibaek Janne Gadsboell |
author_sort |
Sigrid Tibaek |
title |
A quality of life questionnaire for patients with scapula alata (SA-Q): development and validation |
title_short |
A quality of life questionnaire for patients with scapula alata (SA-Q): development and validation |
title_full |
A quality of life questionnaire for patients with scapula alata (SA-Q): development and validation |
title_fullStr |
A quality of life questionnaire for patients with scapula alata (SA-Q): development and validation |
title_full_unstemmed |
A quality of life questionnaire for patients with scapula alata (SA-Q): development and validation |
title_sort |
quality of life questionnaire for patients with scapula alata (sa-q): development and validation |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders |
issn |
1471-2474 |
publishDate |
2020-04-01 |
description |
Abstract Background No quality of life (QoL) questionnaire exists for patients with scapula alata (SA). The objective of this study was to develop and validate a QoL questionnaire for SA patients. Methods A team consisting of experts (n = 7) and SA patients (n = 7) developed, through five continuous phases, a QoL questionnaire for SA patients (SA-Q). The developed questionnaire consists of 21 items, grouped in five domains: physical symptoms (five items), work (four items), sport and leisure activities (four items), life style (four items) and emotions (four items). Content and face validity for the SA-Q questionnaire were evaluated by a sample of 48 (90%) out of 53 SA patients recruited from a university hospital. The Content Validity Index (CVI) and modified kappa index (κ*) assessed the relevance of SA-Q questionnaire. Results The SA patients evaluated 20 (95%) out of 21 items as excellent for content validity (I-CVI > 0.78, κ* > 0.74), one (5%) item was considered as good (I-CVI < 0.78, 0.60 < κ* < 0.74). The average scale (S-CVI/ave) for the entire SA-Q questionnaire was 0.93 indicating an excellent content validity. Conclusions This study presents the development and validation of content validity of the first QoL questionnaire for SA patients. The SA-Q questionnaire has potential clinical implications for detected changes concerning the different items during rehabilitation. Clinical trials Not relevant. |
topic |
Content validity Scapula alata, QoL questionnaire |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-020-03284-4 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT sigridtibaek aqualityoflifequestionnaireforpatientswithscapulaalatasaqdevelopmentandvalidation AT jannegadsboell aqualityoflifequestionnaireforpatientswithscapulaalatasaqdevelopmentandvalidation AT sigridtibaek qualityoflifequestionnaireforpatientswithscapulaalatasaqdevelopmentandvalidation AT jannegadsboell qualityoflifequestionnaireforpatientswithscapulaalatasaqdevelopmentandvalidation |
_version_ |
1724479908178034688 |