A quality of life questionnaire for patients with scapula alata (SA-Q): development and validation

Abstract Background No quality of life (QoL) questionnaire exists for patients with scapula alata (SA). The objective of this study was to develop and validate a QoL questionnaire for SA patients. Methods A team consisting of experts (n = 7) and SA patients (n = 7) developed, through five continuous...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sigrid Tibaek, Janne Gadsboell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-04-01
Series:BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-020-03284-4
id doaj-fd0e49b4e5ab4dcab490e842b166b84b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fd0e49b4e5ab4dcab490e842b166b84b2020-11-25T03:53:07ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742020-04-012111910.1186/s12891-020-03284-4A quality of life questionnaire for patients with scapula alata (SA-Q): development and validationSigrid Tibaek0Janne Gadsboell1Department of Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Copenhagen University HospitalDepartment of Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Copenhagen University HospitalAbstract Background No quality of life (QoL) questionnaire exists for patients with scapula alata (SA). The objective of this study was to develop and validate a QoL questionnaire for SA patients. Methods A team consisting of experts (n = 7) and SA patients (n = 7) developed, through five continuous phases, a QoL questionnaire for SA patients (SA-Q). The developed questionnaire consists of 21 items, grouped in five domains: physical symptoms (five items), work (four items), sport and leisure activities (four items), life style (four items) and emotions (four items). Content and face validity for the SA-Q questionnaire were evaluated by a sample of 48 (90%) out of 53 SA patients recruited from a university hospital. The Content Validity Index (CVI) and modified kappa index (κ*) assessed the relevance of SA-Q questionnaire. Results The SA patients evaluated 20 (95%) out of 21 items as excellent for content validity (I-CVI > 0.78, κ* > 0.74), one (5%) item was considered as good (I-CVI < 0.78, 0.60 < κ* < 0.74). The average scale (S-CVI/ave) for the entire SA-Q questionnaire was 0.93 indicating an excellent content validity. Conclusions This study presents the development and validation of content validity of the first QoL questionnaire for SA patients. The SA-Q questionnaire has potential clinical implications for detected changes concerning the different items during rehabilitation. Clinical trials Not relevant.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-020-03284-4Content validityScapula alata, QoL questionnaire
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sigrid Tibaek
Janne Gadsboell
spellingShingle Sigrid Tibaek
Janne Gadsboell
A quality of life questionnaire for patients with scapula alata (SA-Q): development and validation
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Content validity
Scapula alata, QoL questionnaire
author_facet Sigrid Tibaek
Janne Gadsboell
author_sort Sigrid Tibaek
title A quality of life questionnaire for patients with scapula alata (SA-Q): development and validation
title_short A quality of life questionnaire for patients with scapula alata (SA-Q): development and validation
title_full A quality of life questionnaire for patients with scapula alata (SA-Q): development and validation
title_fullStr A quality of life questionnaire for patients with scapula alata (SA-Q): development and validation
title_full_unstemmed A quality of life questionnaire for patients with scapula alata (SA-Q): development and validation
title_sort quality of life questionnaire for patients with scapula alata (sa-q): development and validation
publisher BMC
series BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
issn 1471-2474
publishDate 2020-04-01
description Abstract Background No quality of life (QoL) questionnaire exists for patients with scapula alata (SA). The objective of this study was to develop and validate a QoL questionnaire for SA patients. Methods A team consisting of experts (n = 7) and SA patients (n = 7) developed, through five continuous phases, a QoL questionnaire for SA patients (SA-Q). The developed questionnaire consists of 21 items, grouped in five domains: physical symptoms (five items), work (four items), sport and leisure activities (four items), life style (four items) and emotions (four items). Content and face validity for the SA-Q questionnaire were evaluated by a sample of 48 (90%) out of 53 SA patients recruited from a university hospital. The Content Validity Index (CVI) and modified kappa index (κ*) assessed the relevance of SA-Q questionnaire. Results The SA patients evaluated 20 (95%) out of 21 items as excellent for content validity (I-CVI > 0.78, κ* > 0.74), one (5%) item was considered as good (I-CVI < 0.78, 0.60 < κ* < 0.74). The average scale (S-CVI/ave) for the entire SA-Q questionnaire was 0.93 indicating an excellent content validity. Conclusions This study presents the development and validation of content validity of the first QoL questionnaire for SA patients. The SA-Q questionnaire has potential clinical implications for detected changes concerning the different items during rehabilitation. Clinical trials Not relevant.
topic Content validity
Scapula alata, QoL questionnaire
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-020-03284-4
work_keys_str_mv AT sigridtibaek aqualityoflifequestionnaireforpatientswithscapulaalatasaqdevelopmentandvalidation
AT jannegadsboell aqualityoflifequestionnaireforpatientswithscapulaalatasaqdevelopmentandvalidation
AT sigridtibaek qualityoflifequestionnaireforpatientswithscapulaalatasaqdevelopmentandvalidation
AT jannegadsboell qualityoflifequestionnaireforpatientswithscapulaalatasaqdevelopmentandvalidation
_version_ 1724479908178034688