Large Residual Volume, Not Low Packing Density, Is the Most Influential Risk Factor for Recanalization after Coil Embolization of Cerebral Aneurysms.

BACKGROUND:Tight coil packing with density of at least 20%-25% is known to be important for preventing recanalization after embolization of cerebral aneurysms. However, large aneurysms sometimes recanalize regardless of the packing density, suggesting that the absolute residual volume which is deter...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Akiyo Sadato, Motoharu Hayakawa, Kazuhide Adachi, Ichiro Nakahara, Yuichi Hirose
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4859523?pdf=render
id doaj-fd1fe9d7940f4ff8a4b8c20010b54bbd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fd1fe9d7940f4ff8a4b8c20010b54bbd2020-11-24T21:35:15ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01115e015506210.1371/journal.pone.0155062Large Residual Volume, Not Low Packing Density, Is the Most Influential Risk Factor for Recanalization after Coil Embolization of Cerebral Aneurysms.Akiyo SadatoMotoharu HayakawaKazuhide AdachiIchiro NakaharaYuichi HiroseBACKGROUND:Tight coil packing with density of at least 20%-25% is known to be important for preventing recanalization after embolization of cerebral aneurysms. However, large aneurysms sometimes recanalize regardless of the packing density, suggesting that the absolute residual volume which is determined by aneurysm volume and packing density may be more important risk factor for recanalization. To validate this hypothesis, we analyzed the factors affecting the outcomes of treated aneurysms at our institute. METHODS AND FINDINGS:We included 355 small and large aneurysms. The following six factors were obtained from every case: aneurysm volume (mL), neck size (mm), packing density (%), residual volume (mL), rupture status at presentation, and stent assistance (with or without stent). The data were then subjected to multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify significant risk factors for recanalization. Recanalization occurred in 61 aneurysms (17.2%). Significant predictors for recanalization were aneurysm volume (odds ratio, 15.3; P < 0.001) and residual volume (odds ratio, 30.9; P < 0.001), but not packing density (odds ratio, 0.98; P = 0.341). These results showed that for each 0.1-mL increase in aneurysm volume and residual volume, the risk of recanalization increased by 1.3 times and 1.4 times, respectively. CONCLUSIONS:The most influential risk factor for recanalization after coil embolization was residual volume, not packing density. The larger the aneurysm volume, the greater the packing density has to be to minimize the residual volume and risk of recanalization. Since tight coil packing has already been aimed, further innovation of coil property or embolization technique may be needed. Otherwise, different treatment modality such as flow diverter or parent artery occlusion may have to be considered.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4859523?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Akiyo Sadato
Motoharu Hayakawa
Kazuhide Adachi
Ichiro Nakahara
Yuichi Hirose
spellingShingle Akiyo Sadato
Motoharu Hayakawa
Kazuhide Adachi
Ichiro Nakahara
Yuichi Hirose
Large Residual Volume, Not Low Packing Density, Is the Most Influential Risk Factor for Recanalization after Coil Embolization of Cerebral Aneurysms.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Akiyo Sadato
Motoharu Hayakawa
Kazuhide Adachi
Ichiro Nakahara
Yuichi Hirose
author_sort Akiyo Sadato
title Large Residual Volume, Not Low Packing Density, Is the Most Influential Risk Factor for Recanalization after Coil Embolization of Cerebral Aneurysms.
title_short Large Residual Volume, Not Low Packing Density, Is the Most Influential Risk Factor for Recanalization after Coil Embolization of Cerebral Aneurysms.
title_full Large Residual Volume, Not Low Packing Density, Is the Most Influential Risk Factor for Recanalization after Coil Embolization of Cerebral Aneurysms.
title_fullStr Large Residual Volume, Not Low Packing Density, Is the Most Influential Risk Factor for Recanalization after Coil Embolization of Cerebral Aneurysms.
title_full_unstemmed Large Residual Volume, Not Low Packing Density, Is the Most Influential Risk Factor for Recanalization after Coil Embolization of Cerebral Aneurysms.
title_sort large residual volume, not low packing density, is the most influential risk factor for recanalization after coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2016-01-01
description BACKGROUND:Tight coil packing with density of at least 20%-25% is known to be important for preventing recanalization after embolization of cerebral aneurysms. However, large aneurysms sometimes recanalize regardless of the packing density, suggesting that the absolute residual volume which is determined by aneurysm volume and packing density may be more important risk factor for recanalization. To validate this hypothesis, we analyzed the factors affecting the outcomes of treated aneurysms at our institute. METHODS AND FINDINGS:We included 355 small and large aneurysms. The following six factors were obtained from every case: aneurysm volume (mL), neck size (mm), packing density (%), residual volume (mL), rupture status at presentation, and stent assistance (with or without stent). The data were then subjected to multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify significant risk factors for recanalization. Recanalization occurred in 61 aneurysms (17.2%). Significant predictors for recanalization were aneurysm volume (odds ratio, 15.3; P < 0.001) and residual volume (odds ratio, 30.9; P < 0.001), but not packing density (odds ratio, 0.98; P = 0.341). These results showed that for each 0.1-mL increase in aneurysm volume and residual volume, the risk of recanalization increased by 1.3 times and 1.4 times, respectively. CONCLUSIONS:The most influential risk factor for recanalization after coil embolization was residual volume, not packing density. The larger the aneurysm volume, the greater the packing density has to be to minimize the residual volume and risk of recanalization. Since tight coil packing has already been aimed, further innovation of coil property or embolization technique may be needed. Otherwise, different treatment modality such as flow diverter or parent artery occlusion may have to be considered.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4859523?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT akiyosadato largeresidualvolumenotlowpackingdensityisthemostinfluentialriskfactorforrecanalizationaftercoilembolizationofcerebralaneurysms
AT motoharuhayakawa largeresidualvolumenotlowpackingdensityisthemostinfluentialriskfactorforrecanalizationaftercoilembolizationofcerebralaneurysms
AT kazuhideadachi largeresidualvolumenotlowpackingdensityisthemostinfluentialriskfactorforrecanalizationaftercoilembolizationofcerebralaneurysms
AT ichironakahara largeresidualvolumenotlowpackingdensityisthemostinfluentialriskfactorforrecanalizationaftercoilembolizationofcerebralaneurysms
AT yuichihirose largeresidualvolumenotlowpackingdensityisthemostinfluentialriskfactorforrecanalizationaftercoilembolizationofcerebralaneurysms
_version_ 1725945753286737920