Increasing the Scope of Birth and Death Registration: Issues and Challenges

Despite being regulated by the Presidential Decree No 25 of 2008, which then was simplified by the Law No 24 of 2013, the registration of birth and death in Indonesia does not automatically promote the scope of birth and death certificate in Indonesia. Local governments are with their respective inn...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hari Prasetyo, Moh. Ilham A. Hamudy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Bina Praja Press 2016-05-01
Series:Jurnal Bina Praja
Subjects:
Online Access:http://binaprajajournal.com/ojs/index.php/jbp/article/view/159/127
id doaj-fd2838901e5f472d835d853d64fce398
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fd2838901e5f472d835d853d64fce3982021-06-02T10:11:22ZengBina Praja PressJurnal Bina Praja2085-43232503-33602016-05-0181132610.21787/jbp.08.2016.13-26Increasing the Scope of Birth and Death Registration: Issues and ChallengesHari Prasetyo0Moh. Ilham A. Hamudy1Research and Development Agency, Ministry of Home Affairs (BPP Kemendagri)Research and Development Agency, Ministry of Home Affairs (BPP Kemendagri)Despite being regulated by the Presidential Decree No 25 of 2008, which then was simplified by the Law No 24 of 2013, the registration of birth and death in Indonesia does not automatically promote the scope of birth and death certificate in Indonesia. Local governments are with their respective innovations on these issue, yet these inovations tend to add more bureaucracy and create new problems. The purpose of this study is to examine how the real practice of birth and death registration, as well as to identify the problems, implications, and the causes of the registration implementation. This study was conducted in 2015 in two districts and two municipalities in Banten and West Java Provinces using descriptive research method and descriptive-qualitative analysis. This study found that birth and death registration are still referring to the Presidential Decree No 25 of 2008 which implementation is still adapting the “convenience” of the Law No 24 of 2013. The implementation of birth and death registration still experiences many obstacles, such as: the lack of death reporting by the head of neighborhood (RT); applicants still experience tiered bureaucracy that leads to a lengthy process of completing the document, limited access in the district area, and time service mismatch; human resources in the ub-district/village that are not adequately supportive to the civil registration services; and documentation process in the implementing agencies still relies on manual systems.http://binaprajajournal.com/ojs/index.php/jbp/article/view/159/127civil registrationbirth certificatedeath certificate
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hari Prasetyo
Moh. Ilham A. Hamudy
spellingShingle Hari Prasetyo
Moh. Ilham A. Hamudy
Increasing the Scope of Birth and Death Registration: Issues and Challenges
Jurnal Bina Praja
civil registration
birth certificate
death certificate
author_facet Hari Prasetyo
Moh. Ilham A. Hamudy
author_sort Hari Prasetyo
title Increasing the Scope of Birth and Death Registration: Issues and Challenges
title_short Increasing the Scope of Birth and Death Registration: Issues and Challenges
title_full Increasing the Scope of Birth and Death Registration: Issues and Challenges
title_fullStr Increasing the Scope of Birth and Death Registration: Issues and Challenges
title_full_unstemmed Increasing the Scope of Birth and Death Registration: Issues and Challenges
title_sort increasing the scope of birth and death registration: issues and challenges
publisher Bina Praja Press
series Jurnal Bina Praja
issn 2085-4323
2503-3360
publishDate 2016-05-01
description Despite being regulated by the Presidential Decree No 25 of 2008, which then was simplified by the Law No 24 of 2013, the registration of birth and death in Indonesia does not automatically promote the scope of birth and death certificate in Indonesia. Local governments are with their respective innovations on these issue, yet these inovations tend to add more bureaucracy and create new problems. The purpose of this study is to examine how the real practice of birth and death registration, as well as to identify the problems, implications, and the causes of the registration implementation. This study was conducted in 2015 in two districts and two municipalities in Banten and West Java Provinces using descriptive research method and descriptive-qualitative analysis. This study found that birth and death registration are still referring to the Presidential Decree No 25 of 2008 which implementation is still adapting the “convenience” of the Law No 24 of 2013. The implementation of birth and death registration still experiences many obstacles, such as: the lack of death reporting by the head of neighborhood (RT); applicants still experience tiered bureaucracy that leads to a lengthy process of completing the document, limited access in the district area, and time service mismatch; human resources in the ub-district/village that are not adequately supportive to the civil registration services; and documentation process in the implementing agencies still relies on manual systems.
topic civil registration
birth certificate
death certificate
url http://binaprajajournal.com/ojs/index.php/jbp/article/view/159/127
work_keys_str_mv AT hariprasetyo increasingthescopeofbirthanddeathregistrationissuesandchallenges
AT mohilhamahamudy increasingthescopeofbirthanddeathregistrationissuesandchallenges
_version_ 1721405381631016960