A Post-War Paradox of Informality in South Lebanon: Rebuilding Houses or Destroying Legitimacy

Recent multiethnic Lebanese history has been characterised by a high degree of tension between sectarian groups and the state. In a number of cases, minority groups’ resistance to localised majority groups developed into a manifest attempt to limit the action of the central authority by embracing al...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Marcello Mollica
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Tallinn University 2014-06-01
Series:Studies of Transition States and Societies
Subjects:
Online Access:http://publications.tlu.ee/index.php/stss/article/view/172/135
id doaj-fd2fd80ee7524c92b469d394c1934c14
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fd2fd80ee7524c92b469d394c1934c142020-11-25T01:29:37ZengTallinn University Studies of Transition States and Societies1736-87581736-87582014-06-01613449A Post-War Paradox of Informality in South Lebanon: Rebuilding Houses or Destroying LegitimacyMarcello MollicaRecent multiethnic Lebanese history has been characterised by a high degree of tension between sectarian groups and the state. In a number of cases, minority groups’ resistance to localised majority groups developed into a manifest attempt to limit the action of the central authority by embracing alternative loyalties, both transnational and interreligious. Makdisi (2000) argues that in a multiconfessional Lebanon the old-fashioned idea of longstanding violence between competing sects is unsustainable. However, political microanalysis based on empirical material collected in South Lebanon during and after the 2006 war shows that in situations where state and ethno-religious groups fail to establish a dialogue, tension leads citizens to view the state as alien and other groups as enemies.With reference to Christian minority group responses, this paper looks at the ways Hizbullah post-conflict strategies of reconstruction have been legitimated. Considering the Weberian notion of the state’s sole power and Prato’s (2000) analysis of citizen loyalties to the state as a welfare provider, and reassessing this notion with empirical data collected in conflictual loci, this paper examines the rise of a religion-driven movement in a scenario marked by dramatic economic transformation. The analysis suggests that group denial of the state’s role is most evident at a local level, where sectarian attitudes (e.g. concerning land or property issues) take precedence over nationally based loyalties and where this denial is the only perceptible means of survival for both the individual and his or her group.http://publications.tlu.ee/index.php/stss/article/view/172/135South Lebanonchristian minoritiesland transactionHizbullahinformal economy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marcello Mollica
spellingShingle Marcello Mollica
A Post-War Paradox of Informality in South Lebanon: Rebuilding Houses or Destroying Legitimacy
Studies of Transition States and Societies
South Lebanon
christian minorities
land transaction
Hizbullah
informal economy
author_facet Marcello Mollica
author_sort Marcello Mollica
title A Post-War Paradox of Informality in South Lebanon: Rebuilding Houses or Destroying Legitimacy
title_short A Post-War Paradox of Informality in South Lebanon: Rebuilding Houses or Destroying Legitimacy
title_full A Post-War Paradox of Informality in South Lebanon: Rebuilding Houses or Destroying Legitimacy
title_fullStr A Post-War Paradox of Informality in South Lebanon: Rebuilding Houses or Destroying Legitimacy
title_full_unstemmed A Post-War Paradox of Informality in South Lebanon: Rebuilding Houses or Destroying Legitimacy
title_sort post-war paradox of informality in south lebanon: rebuilding houses or destroying legitimacy
publisher Tallinn University
series Studies of Transition States and Societies
issn 1736-8758
1736-8758
publishDate 2014-06-01
description Recent multiethnic Lebanese history has been characterised by a high degree of tension between sectarian groups and the state. In a number of cases, minority groups’ resistance to localised majority groups developed into a manifest attempt to limit the action of the central authority by embracing alternative loyalties, both transnational and interreligious. Makdisi (2000) argues that in a multiconfessional Lebanon the old-fashioned idea of longstanding violence between competing sects is unsustainable. However, political microanalysis based on empirical material collected in South Lebanon during and after the 2006 war shows that in situations where state and ethno-religious groups fail to establish a dialogue, tension leads citizens to view the state as alien and other groups as enemies.With reference to Christian minority group responses, this paper looks at the ways Hizbullah post-conflict strategies of reconstruction have been legitimated. Considering the Weberian notion of the state’s sole power and Prato’s (2000) analysis of citizen loyalties to the state as a welfare provider, and reassessing this notion with empirical data collected in conflictual loci, this paper examines the rise of a religion-driven movement in a scenario marked by dramatic economic transformation. The analysis suggests that group denial of the state’s role is most evident at a local level, where sectarian attitudes (e.g. concerning land or property issues) take precedence over nationally based loyalties and where this denial is the only perceptible means of survival for both the individual and his or her group.
topic South Lebanon
christian minorities
land transaction
Hizbullah
informal economy
url http://publications.tlu.ee/index.php/stss/article/view/172/135
work_keys_str_mv AT marcellomollica apostwarparadoxofinformalityinsouthlebanonrebuildinghousesordestroyinglegitimacy
AT marcellomollica postwarparadoxofinformalityinsouthlebanonrebuildinghousesordestroyinglegitimacy
_version_ 1725096024177901568