The Contemporary World Order, BRICS and the R2P+ Principle: the Cases of Brazil and China (2005/2017)

Objective/Context: One major pillar of the world orders’ legitimacy is the existence and recognition of international norms and institutions. In the literature on International Relations, many studies call attention to the importance of these features in approaching such topics as (inter)national so...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Augusto Leal Rinaldi, Cristina Soreanu Pecequilo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidad de los Andes 2021-01-01
Series:Colombia Internacional
Subjects:
r2p
Online Access:https://revistas.uniandes.edu.co/doi/full/10.7440/colombiaint105.2021.01
id doaj-fd5423cc219c4bbd9a6bbd1f5fddb8f9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fd5423cc219c4bbd9a6bbd1f5fddb8f92021-05-06T22:49:09ZengUniversidad de los AndesColombia Internacional0121-56121900-60042021-01-0110532810.7440/colombiaint105.2021.01The Contemporary World Order, BRICS and the R2P+ Principle: the Cases of Brazil and China (2005/2017)Augusto Leal Rinaldi0Cristina Soreanu Pecequilo1Centro Universitário Belas Artes / Universidade de Sao Paulo (Brasil)Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo / Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Brasil)Objective/Context: One major pillar of the world orders’ legitimacy is the existence and recognition of international norms and institutions. In the literature on International Relations, many studies call attention to the importance of these features in approaching such topics as (inter)national sovereignty, humanitarian crises, and military interventions. Since the dynamic of contemporary global power is changing due to the rise of new centres of power such as the BRICS countries, it is worth evaluating whether, and to what extent, these new actors will follow the same established norms or challenge them. In this article, we analyse the BRICS’s adherence or failure to adhere to the norms encompassed by the concept of “Responsibility to Protect” (R2P). Methodology: It is a comparative investigation, based on official documents and a qualitative analysis, and focuses on the period of 2005-2017. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that even though the BRICS group do not present a united front in this field, they have highlighted the divisions in the international approach to R2P as seen in two major initiatives, led by Brazil and China. Originality: We argue that Brazil´s “Responsibility while Protecting” (RwP) and China´s “Responsible Protection” (RP) mean that those countries can be classified as “active critics of the norms” of R2P, while the other members are either “active critics” or “active critics and implementers”.https://revistas.uniandes.edu.co/doi/full/10.7440/colombiaint105.2021.01bricsr2pworld orderrising powers
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Augusto Leal Rinaldi
Cristina Soreanu Pecequilo
spellingShingle Augusto Leal Rinaldi
Cristina Soreanu Pecequilo
The Contemporary World Order, BRICS and the R2P+ Principle: the Cases of Brazil and China (2005/2017)
Colombia Internacional
brics
r2p
world order
rising powers
author_facet Augusto Leal Rinaldi
Cristina Soreanu Pecequilo
author_sort Augusto Leal Rinaldi
title The Contemporary World Order, BRICS and the R2P+ Principle: the Cases of Brazil and China (2005/2017)
title_short The Contemporary World Order, BRICS and the R2P+ Principle: the Cases of Brazil and China (2005/2017)
title_full The Contemporary World Order, BRICS and the R2P+ Principle: the Cases of Brazil and China (2005/2017)
title_fullStr The Contemporary World Order, BRICS and the R2P+ Principle: the Cases of Brazil and China (2005/2017)
title_full_unstemmed The Contemporary World Order, BRICS and the R2P+ Principle: the Cases of Brazil and China (2005/2017)
title_sort contemporary world order, brics and the r2p+ principle: the cases of brazil and china (2005/2017)
publisher Universidad de los Andes
series Colombia Internacional
issn 0121-5612
1900-6004
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Objective/Context: One major pillar of the world orders’ legitimacy is the existence and recognition of international norms and institutions. In the literature on International Relations, many studies call attention to the importance of these features in approaching such topics as (inter)national sovereignty, humanitarian crises, and military interventions. Since the dynamic of contemporary global power is changing due to the rise of new centres of power such as the BRICS countries, it is worth evaluating whether, and to what extent, these new actors will follow the same established norms or challenge them. In this article, we analyse the BRICS’s adherence or failure to adhere to the norms encompassed by the concept of “Responsibility to Protect” (R2P). Methodology: It is a comparative investigation, based on official documents and a qualitative analysis, and focuses on the period of 2005-2017. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that even though the BRICS group do not present a united front in this field, they have highlighted the divisions in the international approach to R2P as seen in two major initiatives, led by Brazil and China. Originality: We argue that Brazil´s “Responsibility while Protecting” (RwP) and China´s “Responsible Protection” (RP) mean that those countries can be classified as “active critics of the norms” of R2P, while the other members are either “active critics” or “active critics and implementers”.
topic brics
r2p
world order
rising powers
url https://revistas.uniandes.edu.co/doi/full/10.7440/colombiaint105.2021.01
work_keys_str_mv AT augustolealrinaldi thecontemporaryworldorderbricsandther2pprinciplethecasesofbrazilandchina20052017
AT cristinasoreanupecequilo thecontemporaryworldorderbricsandther2pprinciplethecasesofbrazilandchina20052017
AT augustolealrinaldi contemporaryworldorderbricsandther2pprinciplethecasesofbrazilandchina20052017
AT cristinasoreanupecequilo contemporaryworldorderbricsandther2pprinciplethecasesofbrazilandchina20052017
_version_ 1721456108685492224