Analysing the Adjectival Museum: Exploring the bureaucratic nature of museums and the implications for researchers and the research process

The proliferation of titles for types of museum has resulted in an adjectival explosion in recent years (with museums being engaging, relevant, professional, adaptive, community, national, universal, local, independent, people’s, children’s, scientific, natural history, labour, virtual, symbolic, co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Clive Gray, Vikki McCall
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Leicester 2018-07-01
Series:Museum & Society
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.le.ac.uk/ojs1/index.php/mas/article/view/2809
id doaj-fd54dbaeed494edabc96dacba087785e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fd54dbaeed494edabc96dacba087785e2020-11-24T21:17:00ZengUniversity of LeicesterMuseum & Society1479-83602018-07-0116212413710.29311/mas.v16i2.28092592Analysing the Adjectival Museum: Exploring the bureaucratic nature of museums and the implications for researchers and the research processClive Gray0Vikki McCall1University of WarwickUniversity of StirlingThe proliferation of titles for types of museum has resulted in an adjectival explosion in recent years (with museums being engaging, relevant, professional, adaptive, community, national, universal, local, independent, people’s, children’s, scientific, natural history, labour, virtual, symbolic, connected, trust and charitable, amongst many other labels). This paper argues that the adoption of an organizational focus on bureaucratic features such as hierarchical authority, centralisation of power, functional specialisation and research processes can show commonalities in the understandings and challenges linked to museum function. The emphasis on museums as a specific institutional and organizational form allows for the identification and explanation of similarities and differences in their operational existence that extends beyond their particular individual natures. This also implies that the bureaucratic nature of museums has implications for researchers as they are organizations that reflect gender and power dynamics on a micro-level within the research process.https://journals.le.ac.uk/ojs1/index.php/mas/article/view/2809BureaucracyAdjectival MuseumsMuseums researchAnalytical methodsCulture
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Clive Gray
Vikki McCall
spellingShingle Clive Gray
Vikki McCall
Analysing the Adjectival Museum: Exploring the bureaucratic nature of museums and the implications for researchers and the research process
Museum & Society
Bureaucracy
Adjectival Museums
Museums research
Analytical methods
Culture
author_facet Clive Gray
Vikki McCall
author_sort Clive Gray
title Analysing the Adjectival Museum: Exploring the bureaucratic nature of museums and the implications for researchers and the research process
title_short Analysing the Adjectival Museum: Exploring the bureaucratic nature of museums and the implications for researchers and the research process
title_full Analysing the Adjectival Museum: Exploring the bureaucratic nature of museums and the implications for researchers and the research process
title_fullStr Analysing the Adjectival Museum: Exploring the bureaucratic nature of museums and the implications for researchers and the research process
title_full_unstemmed Analysing the Adjectival Museum: Exploring the bureaucratic nature of museums and the implications for researchers and the research process
title_sort analysing the adjectival museum: exploring the bureaucratic nature of museums and the implications for researchers and the research process
publisher University of Leicester
series Museum & Society
issn 1479-8360
publishDate 2018-07-01
description The proliferation of titles for types of museum has resulted in an adjectival explosion in recent years (with museums being engaging, relevant, professional, adaptive, community, national, universal, local, independent, people’s, children’s, scientific, natural history, labour, virtual, symbolic, connected, trust and charitable, amongst many other labels). This paper argues that the adoption of an organizational focus on bureaucratic features such as hierarchical authority, centralisation of power, functional specialisation and research processes can show commonalities in the understandings and challenges linked to museum function. The emphasis on museums as a specific institutional and organizational form allows for the identification and explanation of similarities and differences in their operational existence that extends beyond their particular individual natures. This also implies that the bureaucratic nature of museums has implications for researchers as they are organizations that reflect gender and power dynamics on a micro-level within the research process.
topic Bureaucracy
Adjectival Museums
Museums research
Analytical methods
Culture
url https://journals.le.ac.uk/ojs1/index.php/mas/article/view/2809
work_keys_str_mv AT clivegray analysingtheadjectivalmuseumexploringthebureaucraticnatureofmuseumsandtheimplicationsforresearchersandtheresearchprocess
AT vikkimccall analysingtheadjectivalmuseumexploringthebureaucraticnatureofmuseumsandtheimplicationsforresearchersandtheresearchprocess
_version_ 1726014813604151296