Analysing the Adjectival Museum: Exploring the bureaucratic nature of museums and the implications for researchers and the research process
The proliferation of titles for types of museum has resulted in an adjectival explosion in recent years (with museums being engaging, relevant, professional, adaptive, community, national, universal, local, independent, people’s, children’s, scientific, natural history, labour, virtual, symbolic, co...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Leicester
2018-07-01
|
Series: | Museum & Society |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journals.le.ac.uk/ojs1/index.php/mas/article/view/2809 |
id |
doaj-fd54dbaeed494edabc96dacba087785e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-fd54dbaeed494edabc96dacba087785e2020-11-24T21:17:00ZengUniversity of LeicesterMuseum & Society1479-83602018-07-0116212413710.29311/mas.v16i2.28092592Analysing the Adjectival Museum: Exploring the bureaucratic nature of museums and the implications for researchers and the research processClive Gray0Vikki McCall1University of WarwickUniversity of StirlingThe proliferation of titles for types of museum has resulted in an adjectival explosion in recent years (with museums being engaging, relevant, professional, adaptive, community, national, universal, local, independent, people’s, children’s, scientific, natural history, labour, virtual, symbolic, connected, trust and charitable, amongst many other labels). This paper argues that the adoption of an organizational focus on bureaucratic features such as hierarchical authority, centralisation of power, functional specialisation and research processes can show commonalities in the understandings and challenges linked to museum function. The emphasis on museums as a specific institutional and organizational form allows for the identification and explanation of similarities and differences in their operational existence that extends beyond their particular individual natures. This also implies that the bureaucratic nature of museums has implications for researchers as they are organizations that reflect gender and power dynamics on a micro-level within the research process.https://journals.le.ac.uk/ojs1/index.php/mas/article/view/2809BureaucracyAdjectival MuseumsMuseums researchAnalytical methodsCulture |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Clive Gray Vikki McCall |
spellingShingle |
Clive Gray Vikki McCall Analysing the Adjectival Museum: Exploring the bureaucratic nature of museums and the implications for researchers and the research process Museum & Society Bureaucracy Adjectival Museums Museums research Analytical methods Culture |
author_facet |
Clive Gray Vikki McCall |
author_sort |
Clive Gray |
title |
Analysing the Adjectival Museum: Exploring the bureaucratic nature of museums and the implications for researchers and the research process |
title_short |
Analysing the Adjectival Museum: Exploring the bureaucratic nature of museums and the implications for researchers and the research process |
title_full |
Analysing the Adjectival Museum: Exploring the bureaucratic nature of museums and the implications for researchers and the research process |
title_fullStr |
Analysing the Adjectival Museum: Exploring the bureaucratic nature of museums and the implications for researchers and the research process |
title_full_unstemmed |
Analysing the Adjectival Museum: Exploring the bureaucratic nature of museums and the implications for researchers and the research process |
title_sort |
analysing the adjectival museum: exploring the bureaucratic nature of museums and the implications for researchers and the research process |
publisher |
University of Leicester |
series |
Museum & Society |
issn |
1479-8360 |
publishDate |
2018-07-01 |
description |
The proliferation of titles for types of museum has resulted in an adjectival explosion in recent years (with museums being engaging, relevant, professional, adaptive, community, national, universal, local, independent, people’s, children’s, scientific, natural history, labour, virtual, symbolic, connected, trust and charitable, amongst many other labels). This paper argues that the adoption of an organizational focus on bureaucratic features such as hierarchical authority, centralisation of power, functional specialisation and research processes can show commonalities in the understandings and challenges linked to museum function. The emphasis on museums as a specific institutional and organizational form allows for the identification and explanation of similarities and differences in their operational existence that extends beyond their particular individual natures. This also implies that the bureaucratic nature of museums has implications for researchers as they are organizations that reflect gender and power dynamics on a micro-level within the research process. |
topic |
Bureaucracy Adjectival Museums Museums research Analytical methods Culture |
url |
https://journals.le.ac.uk/ojs1/index.php/mas/article/view/2809 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT clivegray analysingtheadjectivalmuseumexploringthebureaucraticnatureofmuseumsandtheimplicationsforresearchersandtheresearchprocess AT vikkimccall analysingtheadjectivalmuseumexploringthebureaucraticnatureofmuseumsandtheimplicationsforresearchersandtheresearchprocess |
_version_ |
1726014813604151296 |