Some modifications to the process of discontinuous deformation analysis

This paper presents a modified method of discontinuous deformation analysis (DDA). In the presented method, open-close iteration may not be needed, small penetration is permitted among blocks, and springs are added between contacting block pairs only when a penetration takes place. The three contact...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yong Yu, Jianmin Yin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2015-02-01
Series:Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674775514001012
id doaj-fd5beacbe7cd450ba5f1210e7cd5dd2b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fd5beacbe7cd450ba5f1210e7cd5dd2b2020-11-25T00:21:47ZengElsevierJournal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering1674-77552015-02-01719510010.1016/j.jrmge.2014.12.001Some modifications to the process of discontinuous deformation analysisYong Yu0Jianmin Yin1School of Mechanics and Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, ChinaYangtze River Scientific Research Institute, Wuhan, Hubei 430010, ChinaThis paper presents a modified method of discontinuous deformation analysis (DDA). In the presented method, open-close iteration may not be needed, small penetration is permitted among blocks, and springs are added between contacting block pairs only when a penetration takes place. The three contact patterns (i.e. sliding, locking and opening) in original DDA method are not involved, and the recognition of these contact patterns and treatment of transformation among patterns are not required either, significantly saving the computing time. In a convex to concave contact, there are two candidate entrance edges which may cause uncertainty. In this case, we propose the angle bisector criterion to determine the entrance edge. The spring stiffness is much larger than Young's modulus in the original DDA, however we find that the correct results can still be obtained when it is much smaller than Young's modulus. Finally, the penetrations by using penalty method and augmented Lagrangian method are compared. Penetration of the latter is 1/4 of the former. The range of spring stiffness for the latter is wider than the former, being 0.01–1 of the former. Both methods can lead to correct contact forces.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674775514001012Discontinuous deformation analysis (DDA)Open-close iterationContact forceVertex–vertex contactAngle bisectorAugmented Lagrangian method (ALM)
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yong Yu
Jianmin Yin
spellingShingle Yong Yu
Jianmin Yin
Some modifications to the process of discontinuous deformation analysis
Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
Discontinuous deformation analysis (DDA)
Open-close iteration
Contact force
Vertex–vertex contact
Angle bisector
Augmented Lagrangian method (ALM)
author_facet Yong Yu
Jianmin Yin
author_sort Yong Yu
title Some modifications to the process of discontinuous deformation analysis
title_short Some modifications to the process of discontinuous deformation analysis
title_full Some modifications to the process of discontinuous deformation analysis
title_fullStr Some modifications to the process of discontinuous deformation analysis
title_full_unstemmed Some modifications to the process of discontinuous deformation analysis
title_sort some modifications to the process of discontinuous deformation analysis
publisher Elsevier
series Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
issn 1674-7755
publishDate 2015-02-01
description This paper presents a modified method of discontinuous deformation analysis (DDA). In the presented method, open-close iteration may not be needed, small penetration is permitted among blocks, and springs are added between contacting block pairs only when a penetration takes place. The three contact patterns (i.e. sliding, locking and opening) in original DDA method are not involved, and the recognition of these contact patterns and treatment of transformation among patterns are not required either, significantly saving the computing time. In a convex to concave contact, there are two candidate entrance edges which may cause uncertainty. In this case, we propose the angle bisector criterion to determine the entrance edge. The spring stiffness is much larger than Young's modulus in the original DDA, however we find that the correct results can still be obtained when it is much smaller than Young's modulus. Finally, the penetrations by using penalty method and augmented Lagrangian method are compared. Penetration of the latter is 1/4 of the former. The range of spring stiffness for the latter is wider than the former, being 0.01–1 of the former. Both methods can lead to correct contact forces.
topic Discontinuous deformation analysis (DDA)
Open-close iteration
Contact force
Vertex–vertex contact
Angle bisector
Augmented Lagrangian method (ALM)
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674775514001012
work_keys_str_mv AT yongyu somemodificationstotheprocessofdiscontinuousdeformationanalysis
AT jianminyin somemodificationstotheprocessofdiscontinuousdeformationanalysis
_version_ 1725360962589949952