An Appraisal of Common Reweighting Methods for Nonresponse in Household Surveys Based on the Norwegian Labour Force Survey and the Statistics on Income and Living Conditions Survey

Despite increasing efforts during data collection, nonresponse remains sizeable in many household surveys. Statistical adjustment is hence unavoidable. By reweighting the design, weights of the respondents are adjusted to compensate for nonresponse. However, there is no consensus on how this should...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nguyen Nancy Duong, Zhang Li-Chun
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2020-03-01
Series:Journal of Official Statistics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2020-0008
id doaj-fd64260c1bee4c2c9d838e8e6ec199ce
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fd64260c1bee4c2c9d838e8e6ec199ce2021-09-06T19:41:48ZengSciendoJournal of Official Statistics2001-73672020-03-0136115117210.2478/jos-2020-0008jos-2020-0008An Appraisal of Common Reweighting Methods for Nonresponse in Household Surveys Based on the Norwegian Labour Force Survey and the Statistics on Income and Living Conditions SurveyNguyen Nancy Duong0Zhang Li-Chun1School of Mathematical Sciences, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.Department of Social Statistics and Demography, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.Despite increasing efforts during data collection, nonresponse remains sizeable in many household surveys. Statistical adjustment is hence unavoidable. By reweighting the design, weights of the respondents are adjusted to compensate for nonresponse. However, there is no consensus on how this should be carried out in general. Theoretical comparisons are inconclusive in the literature, and the associated simulation studies involve hypothetical situations not all equally relevant to reality. In this article we evaluate the three most common reweighting approaches in practice, based on real data in Norway from the two largest household surveys in the European Statistical System. We demonstrate how cross- examination of various reweighting estimators can help inform the effectiveness of the available auxiliary variables and the choice of the weight adjustment method.https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2020-0008unit nonresponseauxiliary variable selection: inverse propensity weightinggeneralised regression estimationdoubly robust estimation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nguyen Nancy Duong
Zhang Li-Chun
spellingShingle Nguyen Nancy Duong
Zhang Li-Chun
An Appraisal of Common Reweighting Methods for Nonresponse in Household Surveys Based on the Norwegian Labour Force Survey and the Statistics on Income and Living Conditions Survey
Journal of Official Statistics
unit nonresponse
auxiliary variable selection: inverse propensity weighting
generalised regression estimation
doubly robust estimation
author_facet Nguyen Nancy Duong
Zhang Li-Chun
author_sort Nguyen Nancy Duong
title An Appraisal of Common Reweighting Methods for Nonresponse in Household Surveys Based on the Norwegian Labour Force Survey and the Statistics on Income and Living Conditions Survey
title_short An Appraisal of Common Reweighting Methods for Nonresponse in Household Surveys Based on the Norwegian Labour Force Survey and the Statistics on Income and Living Conditions Survey
title_full An Appraisal of Common Reweighting Methods for Nonresponse in Household Surveys Based on the Norwegian Labour Force Survey and the Statistics on Income and Living Conditions Survey
title_fullStr An Appraisal of Common Reweighting Methods for Nonresponse in Household Surveys Based on the Norwegian Labour Force Survey and the Statistics on Income and Living Conditions Survey
title_full_unstemmed An Appraisal of Common Reweighting Methods for Nonresponse in Household Surveys Based on the Norwegian Labour Force Survey and the Statistics on Income and Living Conditions Survey
title_sort appraisal of common reweighting methods for nonresponse in household surveys based on the norwegian labour force survey and the statistics on income and living conditions survey
publisher Sciendo
series Journal of Official Statistics
issn 2001-7367
publishDate 2020-03-01
description Despite increasing efforts during data collection, nonresponse remains sizeable in many household surveys. Statistical adjustment is hence unavoidable. By reweighting the design, weights of the respondents are adjusted to compensate for nonresponse. However, there is no consensus on how this should be carried out in general. Theoretical comparisons are inconclusive in the literature, and the associated simulation studies involve hypothetical situations not all equally relevant to reality. In this article we evaluate the three most common reweighting approaches in practice, based on real data in Norway from the two largest household surveys in the European Statistical System. We demonstrate how cross- examination of various reweighting estimators can help inform the effectiveness of the available auxiliary variables and the choice of the weight adjustment method.
topic unit nonresponse
auxiliary variable selection: inverse propensity weighting
generalised regression estimation
doubly robust estimation
url https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2020-0008
work_keys_str_mv AT nguyennancyduong anappraisalofcommonreweightingmethodsfornonresponseinhouseholdsurveysbasedonthenorwegianlabourforcesurveyandthestatisticsonincomeandlivingconditionssurvey
AT zhanglichun anappraisalofcommonreweightingmethodsfornonresponseinhouseholdsurveysbasedonthenorwegianlabourforcesurveyandthestatisticsonincomeandlivingconditionssurvey
AT nguyennancyduong appraisalofcommonreweightingmethodsfornonresponseinhouseholdsurveysbasedonthenorwegianlabourforcesurveyandthestatisticsonincomeandlivingconditionssurvey
AT zhanglichun appraisalofcommonreweightingmethodsfornonresponseinhouseholdsurveysbasedonthenorwegianlabourforcesurveyandthestatisticsonincomeandlivingconditionssurvey
_version_ 1717765407963611136