An Analysis of the Residents’ Research, Education, and Wellness Resources in Radiation Oncology Residency Programs in the United States

The purpose of this research was to evaluate the variations in research, education, and wellness resources for residents among radiation oncology (RO) residency programs across the United States. A list of accredited programs for the academic year 2018 to 2019 was collected using the Accreditation C...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Toms Vengaloor Thomas, MD, Teessa Perekattu Kuruvilla, MD, Eldrin Bhanat, MD, MPH, Amy Q. Parr, BS, Ashley Albert, MD, Srinivasan Vijayakumar, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-01-01
Series:Advances in Radiation Oncology
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109420302165
id doaj-fdd7ad93ff6840d5a31fb083ed4c667a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fdd7ad93ff6840d5a31fb083ed4c667a2021-02-15T04:14:12ZengElsevierAdvances in Radiation Oncology2452-10942021-01-0161100548An Analysis of the Residents’ Research, Education, and Wellness Resources in Radiation Oncology Residency Programs in the United StatesToms Vengaloor Thomas, MD0Teessa Perekattu Kuruvilla, MD1Eldrin Bhanat, MD, MPH2Amy Q. Parr, BS3Ashley Albert, MD4Srinivasan Vijayakumar, MD5Corresponding author: Toms Vengaloor Thomas, MD; University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MississippiUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MississippiUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MississippiUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MississippiUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MississippiUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MississippiThe purpose of this research was to evaluate the variations in research, education, and wellness resources for residents among radiation oncology (RO) residency programs across the United States. A list of accredited programs for the academic year 2018 to 2019 was collected using the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education website. Individual residency program websites were used as the primary source of the data, and the Fellowship Residency Electronic Interactive Data Access System website complemented any missing data. We collected data on dedicated research time, resident rotations, wellness resources, and salary information. Excel 2013 was used for analysis. Information from the 94 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education accredited RO residency programs during the academic year 2018 to 2019 was collected. Seventy-five (80%) programs reported the duration of dedicated research time on their websites. At least 6 months are allowed in 48 (51%) programs, and 27 (29%) programs report that dedicated research time is negotiable. Outstandingly, 20 (21%) programs allow 1 year of dedicated research time, and the median dedicated research time is 9 months. From our study, only 13 (14%) residency programs allow residents to rotate in other departments of the same institution. Fifty-nine (63%) programs allow away rotations at other institutions (external electives). An international rotation is permitted only in 19 (20%) programs. Wellness resoursces specifically fatigue managment, resident retreat and resident mentoring programs were available in 53%, 26% and 42% of programs, respectively. The salary information is obtainable for 63 institutions, and the yearly compensation ranges between $51,000 and $78,000. Moonlighting is allowed only in 28 (30%) programs. Our study found that major variations exist among RO residency programs in the United States regarding research, education, and wellness resources for residents.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109420302165
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Toms Vengaloor Thomas, MD
Teessa Perekattu Kuruvilla, MD
Eldrin Bhanat, MD, MPH
Amy Q. Parr, BS
Ashley Albert, MD
Srinivasan Vijayakumar, MD
spellingShingle Toms Vengaloor Thomas, MD
Teessa Perekattu Kuruvilla, MD
Eldrin Bhanat, MD, MPH
Amy Q. Parr, BS
Ashley Albert, MD
Srinivasan Vijayakumar, MD
An Analysis of the Residents’ Research, Education, and Wellness Resources in Radiation Oncology Residency Programs in the United States
Advances in Radiation Oncology
author_facet Toms Vengaloor Thomas, MD
Teessa Perekattu Kuruvilla, MD
Eldrin Bhanat, MD, MPH
Amy Q. Parr, BS
Ashley Albert, MD
Srinivasan Vijayakumar, MD
author_sort Toms Vengaloor Thomas, MD
title An Analysis of the Residents’ Research, Education, and Wellness Resources in Radiation Oncology Residency Programs in the United States
title_short An Analysis of the Residents’ Research, Education, and Wellness Resources in Radiation Oncology Residency Programs in the United States
title_full An Analysis of the Residents’ Research, Education, and Wellness Resources in Radiation Oncology Residency Programs in the United States
title_fullStr An Analysis of the Residents’ Research, Education, and Wellness Resources in Radiation Oncology Residency Programs in the United States
title_full_unstemmed An Analysis of the Residents’ Research, Education, and Wellness Resources in Radiation Oncology Residency Programs in the United States
title_sort analysis of the residents’ research, education, and wellness resources in radiation oncology residency programs in the united states
publisher Elsevier
series Advances in Radiation Oncology
issn 2452-1094
publishDate 2021-01-01
description The purpose of this research was to evaluate the variations in research, education, and wellness resources for residents among radiation oncology (RO) residency programs across the United States. A list of accredited programs for the academic year 2018 to 2019 was collected using the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education website. Individual residency program websites were used as the primary source of the data, and the Fellowship Residency Electronic Interactive Data Access System website complemented any missing data. We collected data on dedicated research time, resident rotations, wellness resources, and salary information. Excel 2013 was used for analysis. Information from the 94 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education accredited RO residency programs during the academic year 2018 to 2019 was collected. Seventy-five (80%) programs reported the duration of dedicated research time on their websites. At least 6 months are allowed in 48 (51%) programs, and 27 (29%) programs report that dedicated research time is negotiable. Outstandingly, 20 (21%) programs allow 1 year of dedicated research time, and the median dedicated research time is 9 months. From our study, only 13 (14%) residency programs allow residents to rotate in other departments of the same institution. Fifty-nine (63%) programs allow away rotations at other institutions (external electives). An international rotation is permitted only in 19 (20%) programs. Wellness resoursces specifically fatigue managment, resident retreat and resident mentoring programs were available in 53%, 26% and 42% of programs, respectively. The salary information is obtainable for 63 institutions, and the yearly compensation ranges between $51,000 and $78,000. Moonlighting is allowed only in 28 (30%) programs. Our study found that major variations exist among RO residency programs in the United States regarding research, education, and wellness resources for residents.
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109420302165
work_keys_str_mv AT tomsvengaloorthomasmd ananalysisoftheresidentsresearcheducationandwellnessresourcesinradiationoncologyresidencyprogramsintheunitedstates
AT teessaperekattukuruvillamd ananalysisoftheresidentsresearcheducationandwellnessresourcesinradiationoncologyresidencyprogramsintheunitedstates
AT eldrinbhanatmdmph ananalysisoftheresidentsresearcheducationandwellnessresourcesinradiationoncologyresidencyprogramsintheunitedstates
AT amyqparrbs ananalysisoftheresidentsresearcheducationandwellnessresourcesinradiationoncologyresidencyprogramsintheunitedstates
AT ashleyalbertmd ananalysisoftheresidentsresearcheducationandwellnessresourcesinradiationoncologyresidencyprogramsintheunitedstates
AT srinivasanvijayakumarmd ananalysisoftheresidentsresearcheducationandwellnessresourcesinradiationoncologyresidencyprogramsintheunitedstates
AT tomsvengaloorthomasmd analysisoftheresidentsresearcheducationandwellnessresourcesinradiationoncologyresidencyprogramsintheunitedstates
AT teessaperekattukuruvillamd analysisoftheresidentsresearcheducationandwellnessresourcesinradiationoncologyresidencyprogramsintheunitedstates
AT eldrinbhanatmdmph analysisoftheresidentsresearcheducationandwellnessresourcesinradiationoncologyresidencyprogramsintheunitedstates
AT amyqparrbs analysisoftheresidentsresearcheducationandwellnessresourcesinradiationoncologyresidencyprogramsintheunitedstates
AT ashleyalbertmd analysisoftheresidentsresearcheducationandwellnessresourcesinradiationoncologyresidencyprogramsintheunitedstates
AT srinivasanvijayakumarmd analysisoftheresidentsresearcheducationandwellnessresourcesinradiationoncologyresidencyprogramsintheunitedstates
_version_ 1724269355902959616