A Product Development Approach Advisor for Navigating Common Design Methods, Processes, and Environments
Many different product development approaches are taught and used in engineering and management disciplines. These formalized design methods, processes, and environments differ in the types of projects for which they are relevant, the project components they include, and the support they provide use...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-02-01
|
Series: | Designs |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2411-9660/4/1/4 |
id |
doaj-fde6507c7333475b88a688aaa229b928 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-fde6507c7333475b88a688aaa229b9282020-11-25T02:16:09ZengMDPI AGDesigns2411-96602020-02-0141410.3390/designs4010004designs4010004A Product Development Approach Advisor for Navigating Common Design Methods, Processes, and EnvironmentsShelby Stewart0Jack Giambalvo1Julia Vance2Jeremy Faludi3Steven Hoffenson4School of Systems & Enterprises, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USASchool of Systems & Enterprises, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USASchaefer School of Engineering & Science, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USAFaculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology (TU Delft), 2628 CE Delft, The NetherlandsSchool of Systems & Enterprises, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USAMany different product development approaches are taught and used in engineering and management disciplines. These formalized design methods, processes, and environments differ in the types of projects for which they are relevant, the project components they include, and the support they provide users. This paper details a review of sixteen well-established product development approaches, the development of a decision support system to help designers and managers navigate these approaches, and the administration of a survey to gather subjective assessments and feedback from design experts. The included approaches—design thinking, systems thinking, total quality management, agile development, waterfall process, engineering design, spiral model, vee model, axiomatic design, value-driven design, decision-based design, lean manufacturing, six sigma, theory of constraints, scrum, and extreme programming—are categorized based on six criteria: complexity, guidance, phase, hardware or software applicability, values, and users. A decision support system referred to as the Product Development Approach Advisor (PD Advisor) is developed to aid designers in navigating these approaches and selecting an appropriate approach based on specific project needs. Next, a survey is conducted with design experts to gather feedback on the support system and the categorization of approaches and criteria. The survey results are compared to the original classification of approaches by the authors to validate and provide feedback on the PD Advisor. The findings highlight the value and limitations of the PD Advisor for product development practice and education, as well as the opportunities for future work.https://www.mdpi.com/2411-9660/4/1/4engineering designproduct developmentdesign methodsdesign processesdecision support system |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Shelby Stewart Jack Giambalvo Julia Vance Jeremy Faludi Steven Hoffenson |
spellingShingle |
Shelby Stewart Jack Giambalvo Julia Vance Jeremy Faludi Steven Hoffenson A Product Development Approach Advisor for Navigating Common Design Methods, Processes, and Environments Designs engineering design product development design methods design processes decision support system |
author_facet |
Shelby Stewart Jack Giambalvo Julia Vance Jeremy Faludi Steven Hoffenson |
author_sort |
Shelby Stewart |
title |
A Product Development Approach Advisor for Navigating Common Design Methods, Processes, and Environments |
title_short |
A Product Development Approach Advisor for Navigating Common Design Methods, Processes, and Environments |
title_full |
A Product Development Approach Advisor for Navigating Common Design Methods, Processes, and Environments |
title_fullStr |
A Product Development Approach Advisor for Navigating Common Design Methods, Processes, and Environments |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Product Development Approach Advisor for Navigating Common Design Methods, Processes, and Environments |
title_sort |
product development approach advisor for navigating common design methods, processes, and environments |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Designs |
issn |
2411-9660 |
publishDate |
2020-02-01 |
description |
Many different product development approaches are taught and used in engineering and management disciplines. These formalized design methods, processes, and environments differ in the types of projects for which they are relevant, the project components they include, and the support they provide users. This paper details a review of sixteen well-established product development approaches, the development of a decision support system to help designers and managers navigate these approaches, and the administration of a survey to gather subjective assessments and feedback from design experts. The included approaches—design thinking, systems thinking, total quality management, agile development, waterfall process, engineering design, spiral model, vee model, axiomatic design, value-driven design, decision-based design, lean manufacturing, six sigma, theory of constraints, scrum, and extreme programming—are categorized based on six criteria: complexity, guidance, phase, hardware or software applicability, values, and users. A decision support system referred to as the Product Development Approach Advisor (PD Advisor) is developed to aid designers in navigating these approaches and selecting an appropriate approach based on specific project needs. Next, a survey is conducted with design experts to gather feedback on the support system and the categorization of approaches and criteria. The survey results are compared to the original classification of approaches by the authors to validate and provide feedback on the PD Advisor. The findings highlight the value and limitations of the PD Advisor for product development practice and education, as well as the opportunities for future work. |
topic |
engineering design product development design methods design processes decision support system |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2411-9660/4/1/4 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT shelbystewart aproductdevelopmentapproachadvisorfornavigatingcommondesignmethodsprocessesandenvironments AT jackgiambalvo aproductdevelopmentapproachadvisorfornavigatingcommondesignmethodsprocessesandenvironments AT juliavance aproductdevelopmentapproachadvisorfornavigatingcommondesignmethodsprocessesandenvironments AT jeremyfaludi aproductdevelopmentapproachadvisorfornavigatingcommondesignmethodsprocessesandenvironments AT stevenhoffenson aproductdevelopmentapproachadvisorfornavigatingcommondesignmethodsprocessesandenvironments AT shelbystewart productdevelopmentapproachadvisorfornavigatingcommondesignmethodsprocessesandenvironments AT jackgiambalvo productdevelopmentapproachadvisorfornavigatingcommondesignmethodsprocessesandenvironments AT juliavance productdevelopmentapproachadvisorfornavigatingcommondesignmethodsprocessesandenvironments AT jeremyfaludi productdevelopmentapproachadvisorfornavigatingcommondesignmethodsprocessesandenvironments AT stevenhoffenson productdevelopmentapproachadvisorfornavigatingcommondesignmethodsprocessesandenvironments |
_version_ |
1724892390138839040 |