Efficacy and Interindividual Variability in Motor-Cortex Plasticity following Anodal tDCS and Paired-Associative Stimulation

Interindividual response variability to various motor-cortex stimulation protocols has been recently reported. Comparative data of stimulation protocols with different modes of action is lacking. We aimed to compare the efficacy and response variability of two LTP-inducing stimulation protocols in t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wolfgang Strube, Tilmann Bunse, Berend Malchow, Alkomiet Hasan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2015-01-01
Series:Neural Plasticity
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/530423
id doaj-fde8540db142411dbfd050fd8d828a07
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fde8540db142411dbfd050fd8d828a072020-11-25T00:21:47ZengHindawi LimitedNeural Plasticity2090-59041687-54432015-01-01201510.1155/2015/530423530423Efficacy and Interindividual Variability in Motor-Cortex Plasticity following Anodal tDCS and Paired-Associative StimulationWolfgang Strube0Tilmann Bunse1Berend Malchow2Alkomiet Hasan3Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig Maximilian University, 80336 Munich, GermanyDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig Maximilian University, 80336 Munich, GermanyDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig Maximilian University, 80336 Munich, GermanyDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig Maximilian University, 80336 Munich, GermanyInterindividual response variability to various motor-cortex stimulation protocols has been recently reported. Comparative data of stimulation protocols with different modes of action is lacking. We aimed to compare the efficacy and response variability of two LTP-inducing stimulation protocols in the human motor cortex: anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS) and paired-associative stimulation (PAS25). In two experiments 30 subjects received 1mA a-tDCS and PAS25. Data analysis focused on motor-cortex excitability change and response defined as increase in MEP applying different cut-offs. Furthermore, the predictive pattern of baseline characteristics was explored. Both protocols induced a significant increase in motor-cortical excitability. In the PAS25 experiments the likelihood to develop a MEP response was higher compared to a-tDCS, whereas for intracortical facilitation (ICF) the likelihood for a response was higher in the a-tDCS experiments. Baseline ICF (12 ms) correlated positively with an increase in MEPs only following a-tDCS and responders had significantly higher ICF baseline values. Contrary to recent studies, we showed significant group-level efficacy following both stimulation protocols confirming older studies. However, we also observed a remarkable amount of nonresponders. Our findings highlight the need to define sufficient physiological read-outs for a given plasticity protocol and to develop predictive markers for targeted stimulation.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/530423
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Wolfgang Strube
Tilmann Bunse
Berend Malchow
Alkomiet Hasan
spellingShingle Wolfgang Strube
Tilmann Bunse
Berend Malchow
Alkomiet Hasan
Efficacy and Interindividual Variability in Motor-Cortex Plasticity following Anodal tDCS and Paired-Associative Stimulation
Neural Plasticity
author_facet Wolfgang Strube
Tilmann Bunse
Berend Malchow
Alkomiet Hasan
author_sort Wolfgang Strube
title Efficacy and Interindividual Variability in Motor-Cortex Plasticity following Anodal tDCS and Paired-Associative Stimulation
title_short Efficacy and Interindividual Variability in Motor-Cortex Plasticity following Anodal tDCS and Paired-Associative Stimulation
title_full Efficacy and Interindividual Variability in Motor-Cortex Plasticity following Anodal tDCS and Paired-Associative Stimulation
title_fullStr Efficacy and Interindividual Variability in Motor-Cortex Plasticity following Anodal tDCS and Paired-Associative Stimulation
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Interindividual Variability in Motor-Cortex Plasticity following Anodal tDCS and Paired-Associative Stimulation
title_sort efficacy and interindividual variability in motor-cortex plasticity following anodal tdcs and paired-associative stimulation
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Neural Plasticity
issn 2090-5904
1687-5443
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Interindividual response variability to various motor-cortex stimulation protocols has been recently reported. Comparative data of stimulation protocols with different modes of action is lacking. We aimed to compare the efficacy and response variability of two LTP-inducing stimulation protocols in the human motor cortex: anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS) and paired-associative stimulation (PAS25). In two experiments 30 subjects received 1mA a-tDCS and PAS25. Data analysis focused on motor-cortex excitability change and response defined as increase in MEP applying different cut-offs. Furthermore, the predictive pattern of baseline characteristics was explored. Both protocols induced a significant increase in motor-cortical excitability. In the PAS25 experiments the likelihood to develop a MEP response was higher compared to a-tDCS, whereas for intracortical facilitation (ICF) the likelihood for a response was higher in the a-tDCS experiments. Baseline ICF (12 ms) correlated positively with an increase in MEPs only following a-tDCS and responders had significantly higher ICF baseline values. Contrary to recent studies, we showed significant group-level efficacy following both stimulation protocols confirming older studies. However, we also observed a remarkable amount of nonresponders. Our findings highlight the need to define sufficient physiological read-outs for a given plasticity protocol and to develop predictive markers for targeted stimulation.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/530423
work_keys_str_mv AT wolfgangstrube efficacyandinterindividualvariabilityinmotorcortexplasticityfollowinganodaltdcsandpairedassociativestimulation
AT tilmannbunse efficacyandinterindividualvariabilityinmotorcortexplasticityfollowinganodaltdcsandpairedassociativestimulation
AT berendmalchow efficacyandinterindividualvariabilityinmotorcortexplasticityfollowinganodaltdcsandpairedassociativestimulation
AT alkomiethasan efficacyandinterindividualvariabilityinmotorcortexplasticityfollowinganodaltdcsandpairedassociativestimulation
_version_ 1725360976599973888