The Role of In Vitro Immune Response Assessment for Biomaterials

Grafts are required to restore tissue integrity and function. However, current gold standard autografting techniques yield limited harvest, with high rates of complication. In the search for viable substitutes, the number of biomaterials being developed and studied has increased rapidly. To date, lo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alistair Lock, Jillian Cornish, David S. Musson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-07-01
Series:Journal of Functional Biomaterials
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4983/10/3/31
id doaj-fe1d23b7d5714bf492b800a7ecdc8866
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fe1d23b7d5714bf492b800a7ecdc88662020-11-24T21:24:23ZengMDPI AGJournal of Functional Biomaterials2079-49832019-07-011033110.3390/jfb10030031jfb10030031The Role of In Vitro Immune Response Assessment for BiomaterialsAlistair Lock0Jillian Cornish1David S. Musson2Department of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New ZealandDepartment of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New ZealandDepartment of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New ZealandGrafts are required to restore tissue integrity and function. However, current gold standard autografting techniques yield limited harvest, with high rates of complication. In the search for viable substitutes, the number of biomaterials being developed and studied has increased rapidly. To date, low clinical uptake has accompanied inherently high failure rates, with immune rejection a specific and common end result. The objective of this review article was to evaluate published immune assays evaluating biomaterials, and to stress the value that incorporating immune assessment into evaluations carries. Immunogenicity assays have had three areas of focus: cell viability, maturation and activation, with the latter being the focus in the majority of the literature due to its relevance to functional outcomes. With recent studies suggesting poor correlation between current in vitro and in vivo testing of biomaterials, in vitro immune response assays may be more relevant and enhance ability in predicting acceptance prior to in vivo application. Uptake of in vitro immune response assessment will allow for substantial reductions in experimental time and resources, including unnecessary and unethical animal use, with a simultaneous decrease in inappropriate biomaterials reaching clinic. This improvement in bench to bedside safety is paramount to reduce patient harm.https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4983/10/3/31in vitroimmune responseimmunogenicitybiomaterialstissue regeneration
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alistair Lock
Jillian Cornish
David S. Musson
spellingShingle Alistair Lock
Jillian Cornish
David S. Musson
The Role of In Vitro Immune Response Assessment for Biomaterials
Journal of Functional Biomaterials
in vitro
immune response
immunogenicity
biomaterials
tissue regeneration
author_facet Alistair Lock
Jillian Cornish
David S. Musson
author_sort Alistair Lock
title The Role of In Vitro Immune Response Assessment for Biomaterials
title_short The Role of In Vitro Immune Response Assessment for Biomaterials
title_full The Role of In Vitro Immune Response Assessment for Biomaterials
title_fullStr The Role of In Vitro Immune Response Assessment for Biomaterials
title_full_unstemmed The Role of In Vitro Immune Response Assessment for Biomaterials
title_sort role of in vitro immune response assessment for biomaterials
publisher MDPI AG
series Journal of Functional Biomaterials
issn 2079-4983
publishDate 2019-07-01
description Grafts are required to restore tissue integrity and function. However, current gold standard autografting techniques yield limited harvest, with high rates of complication. In the search for viable substitutes, the number of biomaterials being developed and studied has increased rapidly. To date, low clinical uptake has accompanied inherently high failure rates, with immune rejection a specific and common end result. The objective of this review article was to evaluate published immune assays evaluating biomaterials, and to stress the value that incorporating immune assessment into evaluations carries. Immunogenicity assays have had three areas of focus: cell viability, maturation and activation, with the latter being the focus in the majority of the literature due to its relevance to functional outcomes. With recent studies suggesting poor correlation between current in vitro and in vivo testing of biomaterials, in vitro immune response assays may be more relevant and enhance ability in predicting acceptance prior to in vivo application. Uptake of in vitro immune response assessment will allow for substantial reductions in experimental time and resources, including unnecessary and unethical animal use, with a simultaneous decrease in inappropriate biomaterials reaching clinic. This improvement in bench to bedside safety is paramount to reduce patient harm.
topic in vitro
immune response
immunogenicity
biomaterials
tissue regeneration
url https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4983/10/3/31
work_keys_str_mv AT alistairlock theroleofinvitroimmuneresponseassessmentforbiomaterials
AT jilliancornish theroleofinvitroimmuneresponseassessmentforbiomaterials
AT davidsmusson theroleofinvitroimmuneresponseassessmentforbiomaterials
AT alistairlock roleofinvitroimmuneresponseassessmentforbiomaterials
AT jilliancornish roleofinvitroimmuneresponseassessmentforbiomaterials
AT davidsmusson roleofinvitroimmuneresponseassessmentforbiomaterials
_version_ 1725988578646818816