From Discovery to Justification: Outline of an Ideal Research Program in Empirical Psychology
The gold standard for an empirical science is the replicability of its research results. But the estimated average replicability rate of key-effects that top-tier psychology journals report falls between 36 and 39% (objective vs. subjective rate; Open Science Collaboration, 2015). So the standard mo...
Main Authors: | Erich H. Witte, Frank Zenker |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2017-10-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01847/full |
Similar Items
-
Hypothesis-Testing Demands Trustworthy Data—A Simulation Approach to Inferential Statistics Advocating the Research Program Strategy
by: Antonia Krefeld-Schwalb, et al.
Published: (2018-04-01) -
Analyzing Social Policy Argumentation: A case study on the opinion of the German National Ethics Council on an amendment of the Stem Cell Law
by: Frank Zenker
Published: (2010-03-01) -
Eemeren & Garssen's Controversy and Confrontation: Relating Controversy Analysis with Argumentation Theory
by: Frank Zenker
Published: (2009-12-01) -
A Social Psychological Model of Scientific Practices: Explaining Research Practices and Outlining the Potential for Successful Reforms
by: Lee Jussim, et al.
Published: (2019-09-01) -
Dealing with the Experimenter Effect
by: Dick Bierman, et al.
Published: (2020-12-01)