The prognostic value of KRAS mutation by cell-free DNA in cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

KRAS mutation has been found in various types of cancer. However, the prognostic value of KRAS mutation in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in cancer patients was conflicting. In the present study, a meta-analysis was conducted to clarify its prognostic significance. Literature searches of Cochrane Library, EM...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rongyuan Zhuang, Song Li, Qian Li, Xi Guo, Feng Shen, Hong Sun, Tianshu Liu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2017-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5552123?pdf=render
id doaj-fe553df5757c4d1791b46b2df4c4b9aa
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fe553df5757c4d1791b46b2df4c4b9aa2020-11-25T01:31:49ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-01128e018256210.1371/journal.pone.0182562The prognostic value of KRAS mutation by cell-free DNA in cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Rongyuan ZhuangSong LiQian LiXi GuoFeng ShenHong SunTianshu LiuKRAS mutation has been found in various types of cancer. However, the prognostic value of KRAS mutation in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in cancer patients was conflicting. In the present study, a meta-analysis was conducted to clarify its prognostic significance. Literature searches of Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PubMed and Web of Science were performed to identify studies related to KRAS mutation detected by cfDNA and survival in cancer patients. Two evaluators reviewed and extracted the information independently. Review Manager 5.3 software was used to perform the statistical analysis. Thirty studies were included in the present meta-analysis. Our analysis showed that KRAS mutation in cfDNA was associated with a poorer survival in cancer patients for overall survival (OS, HR 2.02, 95% CI 1.63-2.51, P<0.01) and progression-free survival (PFS, HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.27-2.13, P<0.01). In subgroup analyses, KRAS mutation in pancreatic cancer, colorectal cancer, non-small cell lung cancer and ovarian epithelial cancer had HRs of 2.81 (95% CI 1.83-4.30, P<0.01), 1.67 (95% CI 1.25-2.42, P<0.01), 1.64 (95% CI 1.13-2.39, P = 0.01) and 2.17 (95% 1.12-4.21, p = 0.02) for OS, respectively. In addition, the ethnicity didn't influence the prognostic value of KRAS mutation in cfDNA in cancer patients (p = 0.39). Prognostic value of KRAS mutation was slightly higher in plasma than in serum (HR 2.13 vs 1.65), but no difference was observed (p = 0.37). Briefly, KRAS mutation in cfDNA was a survival prognostic biomarker in cancer patients. Its prognostic value was different in various types of cancer.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5552123?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rongyuan Zhuang
Song Li
Qian Li
Xi Guo
Feng Shen
Hong Sun
Tianshu Liu
spellingShingle Rongyuan Zhuang
Song Li
Qian Li
Xi Guo
Feng Shen
Hong Sun
Tianshu Liu
The prognostic value of KRAS mutation by cell-free DNA in cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Rongyuan Zhuang
Song Li
Qian Li
Xi Guo
Feng Shen
Hong Sun
Tianshu Liu
author_sort Rongyuan Zhuang
title The prognostic value of KRAS mutation by cell-free DNA in cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_short The prognostic value of KRAS mutation by cell-free DNA in cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_full The prognostic value of KRAS mutation by cell-free DNA in cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_fullStr The prognostic value of KRAS mutation by cell-free DNA in cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_full_unstemmed The prognostic value of KRAS mutation by cell-free DNA in cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_sort prognostic value of kras mutation by cell-free dna in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2017-01-01
description KRAS mutation has been found in various types of cancer. However, the prognostic value of KRAS mutation in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in cancer patients was conflicting. In the present study, a meta-analysis was conducted to clarify its prognostic significance. Literature searches of Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PubMed and Web of Science were performed to identify studies related to KRAS mutation detected by cfDNA and survival in cancer patients. Two evaluators reviewed and extracted the information independently. Review Manager 5.3 software was used to perform the statistical analysis. Thirty studies were included in the present meta-analysis. Our analysis showed that KRAS mutation in cfDNA was associated with a poorer survival in cancer patients for overall survival (OS, HR 2.02, 95% CI 1.63-2.51, P<0.01) and progression-free survival (PFS, HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.27-2.13, P<0.01). In subgroup analyses, KRAS mutation in pancreatic cancer, colorectal cancer, non-small cell lung cancer and ovarian epithelial cancer had HRs of 2.81 (95% CI 1.83-4.30, P<0.01), 1.67 (95% CI 1.25-2.42, P<0.01), 1.64 (95% CI 1.13-2.39, P = 0.01) and 2.17 (95% 1.12-4.21, p = 0.02) for OS, respectively. In addition, the ethnicity didn't influence the prognostic value of KRAS mutation in cfDNA in cancer patients (p = 0.39). Prognostic value of KRAS mutation was slightly higher in plasma than in serum (HR 2.13 vs 1.65), but no difference was observed (p = 0.37). Briefly, KRAS mutation in cfDNA was a survival prognostic biomarker in cancer patients. Its prognostic value was different in various types of cancer.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5552123?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT rongyuanzhuang theprognosticvalueofkrasmutationbycellfreednaincancerpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT songli theprognosticvalueofkrasmutationbycellfreednaincancerpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT qianli theprognosticvalueofkrasmutationbycellfreednaincancerpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xiguo theprognosticvalueofkrasmutationbycellfreednaincancerpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fengshen theprognosticvalueofkrasmutationbycellfreednaincancerpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hongsun theprognosticvalueofkrasmutationbycellfreednaincancerpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tianshuliu theprognosticvalueofkrasmutationbycellfreednaincancerpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rongyuanzhuang prognosticvalueofkrasmutationbycellfreednaincancerpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT songli prognosticvalueofkrasmutationbycellfreednaincancerpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT qianli prognosticvalueofkrasmutationbycellfreednaincancerpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xiguo prognosticvalueofkrasmutationbycellfreednaincancerpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fengshen prognosticvalueofkrasmutationbycellfreednaincancerpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hongsun prognosticvalueofkrasmutationbycellfreednaincancerpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tianshuliu prognosticvalueofkrasmutationbycellfreednaincancerpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
_version_ 1725085122863038464