Memory Effects on Movement Behavior in Animal Foraging.

An individual's choices are shaped by its experience, a fundamental property of behavior important to understanding complex processes. Learning and memory are observed across many taxa and can drive behaviors, including foraging behavior. To explore the conditions under which memory provides an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chloe Bracis, Eliezer Gurarie, Bram Van Moorter, R Andrew Goodwin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136057
id doaj-fe66eed01cd64cf69a4041e50d754ebd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fe66eed01cd64cf69a4041e50d754ebd2021-03-03T19:59:53ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01108e013605710.1371/journal.pone.0136057Memory Effects on Movement Behavior in Animal Foraging.Chloe BracisEliezer GurarieBram Van MoorterR Andrew GoodwinAn individual's choices are shaped by its experience, a fundamental property of behavior important to understanding complex processes. Learning and memory are observed across many taxa and can drive behaviors, including foraging behavior. To explore the conditions under which memory provides an advantage, we present a continuous-space, continuous-time model of animal movement that incorporates learning and memory. Using simulation models, we evaluate the benefit memory provides across several types of landscapes with variable-quality resources and compare the memory model within a nested hierarchy of simpler models (behavioral switching and random walk). We find that memory almost always leads to improved foraging success, but that this effect is most marked in landscapes containing sparse, contiguous patches of high-value resources that regenerate relatively fast and are located in an otherwise devoid landscape. In these cases, there is a large payoff for finding a resource patch, due to size, value, or locational difficulty. While memory-informed search is difficult to differentiate from other factors using solely movement data, our results suggest that disproportionate spatial use of higher value areas, higher consumption rates, and consumption variability all point to memory influencing the movement direction of animals in certain ecosystems.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136057
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Chloe Bracis
Eliezer Gurarie
Bram Van Moorter
R Andrew Goodwin
spellingShingle Chloe Bracis
Eliezer Gurarie
Bram Van Moorter
R Andrew Goodwin
Memory Effects on Movement Behavior in Animal Foraging.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Chloe Bracis
Eliezer Gurarie
Bram Van Moorter
R Andrew Goodwin
author_sort Chloe Bracis
title Memory Effects on Movement Behavior in Animal Foraging.
title_short Memory Effects on Movement Behavior in Animal Foraging.
title_full Memory Effects on Movement Behavior in Animal Foraging.
title_fullStr Memory Effects on Movement Behavior in Animal Foraging.
title_full_unstemmed Memory Effects on Movement Behavior in Animal Foraging.
title_sort memory effects on movement behavior in animal foraging.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2015-01-01
description An individual's choices are shaped by its experience, a fundamental property of behavior important to understanding complex processes. Learning and memory are observed across many taxa and can drive behaviors, including foraging behavior. To explore the conditions under which memory provides an advantage, we present a continuous-space, continuous-time model of animal movement that incorporates learning and memory. Using simulation models, we evaluate the benefit memory provides across several types of landscapes with variable-quality resources and compare the memory model within a nested hierarchy of simpler models (behavioral switching and random walk). We find that memory almost always leads to improved foraging success, but that this effect is most marked in landscapes containing sparse, contiguous patches of high-value resources that regenerate relatively fast and are located in an otherwise devoid landscape. In these cases, there is a large payoff for finding a resource patch, due to size, value, or locational difficulty. While memory-informed search is difficult to differentiate from other factors using solely movement data, our results suggest that disproportionate spatial use of higher value areas, higher consumption rates, and consumption variability all point to memory influencing the movement direction of animals in certain ecosystems.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136057
work_keys_str_mv AT chloebracis memoryeffectsonmovementbehaviorinanimalforaging
AT eliezergurarie memoryeffectsonmovementbehaviorinanimalforaging
AT bramvanmoorter memoryeffectsonmovementbehaviorinanimalforaging
AT randrewgoodwin memoryeffectsonmovementbehaviorinanimalforaging
_version_ 1714824645132156928