Evaluation of DNA extraction yield from a chlorinated drinking water distribution system.

Desalination technology based on Reverse Osmosis (RO) membrane filtration has been resorted to provide high-quality drinking water. RO produced drinking water is characterized by a low bacterial cell concentration. Monitoring microbial quality and ensuring membrane-treated water safety has taken adv...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ratna E Putri, Lan Hee Kim, Nadia Farhat, Mashael Felemban, Pascal E Saikaly, Johannes S Vrouwenvelder
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253799
id doaj-fe6dade229264bdd88083f46c6df9add
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fe6dade229264bdd88083f46c6df9add2021-07-22T04:30:38ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-01166e025379910.1371/journal.pone.0253799Evaluation of DNA extraction yield from a chlorinated drinking water distribution system.Ratna E PutriLan Hee KimNadia FarhatMashael FelembanPascal E SaikalyJohannes S VrouwenvelderDesalination technology based on Reverse Osmosis (RO) membrane filtration has been resorted to provide high-quality drinking water. RO produced drinking water is characterized by a low bacterial cell concentration. Monitoring microbial quality and ensuring membrane-treated water safety has taken advantage of the rapid development of DNA-based techniques. However, the DNA extraction process from RO-based drinking water samples needs to be evaluated regarding the biomass amount (filtration volume) and residual disinfectant such as chlorine, as it can affect the DNA yield. We assessed the DNA recovery applied in drinking water microbiome studies as a function of (i) different filtration volumes, (ii) presence and absence of residual chlorine, and (iii) the addition of a known Escherichia coli concentration into the (sterile and non-sterile, chlorinated and dechlorinated) tap water prior filtration, and directly onto the (0.2 μm pore size, 47 mm diameter) mixed ester cellulose membrane filters without and after tap water filtration. Our findings demonstrated that the co-occurrence of residual chlorine and low biomass/cell density water samples (RO-treated water with a total cell concentration ranging between 2.47 × 102-1.5 × 103 cells/mL) failed to provide sufficient DNA quantity (below the threshold concentration required for sequencing-based procedures) irrespective of filtration volumes used (4, 20, 40, 60 L) and even after performing dechlorination. After exposure to tap water containing residual chlorine (0.2 mg/L), we observed a significant reduction of E. coli cell concentration and the degradation of its DNA (DNA yield was below detection limit) at a lower disinfectant level compared to what was previously reported, indicating that free-living bacteria and their DNA present in the drinking water are subject to the same conditions. The membrane spiking experiment confirmed no significant impact from any potential inhibitors (e.g. organic/inorganic components) present in the drinking water matrix on DNA extraction yield. We found that very low DNA content is likely to be the norm in chlorinated drinking water that gives hindsight to its limitation in providing robust results for any downstream molecular analyses for microbiome surveys. We advise that measurement of DNA yield is a necessary first step in chlorinated drinking water distribution systems (DWDSs) before conducting any downstream omics analyses such as amplicon sequencing to avoid inaccurate interpretations of results based on very low DNA content. This study expands a substantial source of bias in using DNA-based methods for low biomass samples typical in chlorinated DWDSs. Suggestions are provided for DNA-based research in drinking water with residual disinfectant.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253799
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ratna E Putri
Lan Hee Kim
Nadia Farhat
Mashael Felemban
Pascal E Saikaly
Johannes S Vrouwenvelder
spellingShingle Ratna E Putri
Lan Hee Kim
Nadia Farhat
Mashael Felemban
Pascal E Saikaly
Johannes S Vrouwenvelder
Evaluation of DNA extraction yield from a chlorinated drinking water distribution system.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Ratna E Putri
Lan Hee Kim
Nadia Farhat
Mashael Felemban
Pascal E Saikaly
Johannes S Vrouwenvelder
author_sort Ratna E Putri
title Evaluation of DNA extraction yield from a chlorinated drinking water distribution system.
title_short Evaluation of DNA extraction yield from a chlorinated drinking water distribution system.
title_full Evaluation of DNA extraction yield from a chlorinated drinking water distribution system.
title_fullStr Evaluation of DNA extraction yield from a chlorinated drinking water distribution system.
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of DNA extraction yield from a chlorinated drinking water distribution system.
title_sort evaluation of dna extraction yield from a chlorinated drinking water distribution system.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Desalination technology based on Reverse Osmosis (RO) membrane filtration has been resorted to provide high-quality drinking water. RO produced drinking water is characterized by a low bacterial cell concentration. Monitoring microbial quality and ensuring membrane-treated water safety has taken advantage of the rapid development of DNA-based techniques. However, the DNA extraction process from RO-based drinking water samples needs to be evaluated regarding the biomass amount (filtration volume) and residual disinfectant such as chlorine, as it can affect the DNA yield. We assessed the DNA recovery applied in drinking water microbiome studies as a function of (i) different filtration volumes, (ii) presence and absence of residual chlorine, and (iii) the addition of a known Escherichia coli concentration into the (sterile and non-sterile, chlorinated and dechlorinated) tap water prior filtration, and directly onto the (0.2 μm pore size, 47 mm diameter) mixed ester cellulose membrane filters without and after tap water filtration. Our findings demonstrated that the co-occurrence of residual chlorine and low biomass/cell density water samples (RO-treated water with a total cell concentration ranging between 2.47 × 102-1.5 × 103 cells/mL) failed to provide sufficient DNA quantity (below the threshold concentration required for sequencing-based procedures) irrespective of filtration volumes used (4, 20, 40, 60 L) and even after performing dechlorination. After exposure to tap water containing residual chlorine (0.2 mg/L), we observed a significant reduction of E. coli cell concentration and the degradation of its DNA (DNA yield was below detection limit) at a lower disinfectant level compared to what was previously reported, indicating that free-living bacteria and their DNA present in the drinking water are subject to the same conditions. The membrane spiking experiment confirmed no significant impact from any potential inhibitors (e.g. organic/inorganic components) present in the drinking water matrix on DNA extraction yield. We found that very low DNA content is likely to be the norm in chlorinated drinking water that gives hindsight to its limitation in providing robust results for any downstream molecular analyses for microbiome surveys. We advise that measurement of DNA yield is a necessary first step in chlorinated drinking water distribution systems (DWDSs) before conducting any downstream omics analyses such as amplicon sequencing to avoid inaccurate interpretations of results based on very low DNA content. This study expands a substantial source of bias in using DNA-based methods for low biomass samples typical in chlorinated DWDSs. Suggestions are provided for DNA-based research in drinking water with residual disinfectant.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253799
work_keys_str_mv AT ratnaeputri evaluationofdnaextractionyieldfromachlorinateddrinkingwaterdistributionsystem
AT lanheekim evaluationofdnaextractionyieldfromachlorinateddrinkingwaterdistributionsystem
AT nadiafarhat evaluationofdnaextractionyieldfromachlorinateddrinkingwaterdistributionsystem
AT mashaelfelemban evaluationofdnaextractionyieldfromachlorinateddrinkingwaterdistributionsystem
AT pascalesaikaly evaluationofdnaextractionyieldfromachlorinateddrinkingwaterdistributionsystem
AT johannessvrouwenvelder evaluationofdnaextractionyieldfromachlorinateddrinkingwaterdistributionsystem
_version_ 1721292248007573504