Evaluation of surface quality of silicone impression materials after disinfection with ozone water: An In vitro Study

Purpose: To compare and evaluate the surface quality of silicone impression materials after ozone water disinfection. Materials and Methods: A total of 60 samples were prepared on a stainless steel die (American Dental Association specification no. 19 and International Standard of Organization - 482...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: K Abinaya, B Muthu Kumar, S C Ahila
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2018-01-01
Series:Contemporary Clinical Dentistry
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.contempclindent.org/article.asp?issn=0976-237X;year=2018;volume=9;issue=1;spage=60;epage=64;aulast=Abinaya
id doaj-fe7093b9e466449ba08c59dc1c6d141f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fe7093b9e466449ba08c59dc1c6d141f2020-11-24T23:37:35ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsContemporary Clinical Dentistry0976-237X0976-23612018-01-0191606410.4103/ccd.ccd_747_17Evaluation of surface quality of silicone impression materials after disinfection with ozone water: An In vitro StudyK AbinayaB Muthu KumarS C AhilaPurpose: To compare and evaluate the surface quality of silicone impression materials after ozone water disinfection. Materials and Methods: A total of 60 samples were prepared on a stainless steel die (American Dental Association specification no. 19 and International Standard of Organization - 4823). The samples were divided into four groups; each group contains 15 samples. Group A as control, Group B, C, and D disinfected with 2% glutaraldehyde, 5.25% sodium hypochlorite, and ozone water, respectively. The samples were made according to the manufacturer's instructions, and the samples were allowed to set in a thermostatically controlled water bath at 35°C ± 1°C and retrieved after 10 min. The surface qualities of the samples were measured in stereomicroscope with ×20 magnification. Results: The data obtained were analyzed using Chi-square test, and the “P” value was calculated. The results showed that there were no differences in the surface quality among the Groups A, C, and D for addition silicone putty and light body and medium body impression materials than the Group B. Conclusion: This study concluded that ozone water disinfection showed least changes when compared to 5.25%sodium hypochloride and 2% glutaraldehyde disinfection for addition silicone putty , light body and medium body impression materials.http://www.contempclindent.org/article.asp?issn=0976-237X;year=2018;volume=9;issue=1;spage=60;epage=64;aulast=AbinayaDisinfectionO3 watersilicone impression materialsurface quality
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author K Abinaya
B Muthu Kumar
S C Ahila
spellingShingle K Abinaya
B Muthu Kumar
S C Ahila
Evaluation of surface quality of silicone impression materials after disinfection with ozone water: An In vitro Study
Contemporary Clinical Dentistry
Disinfection
O3 water
silicone impression material
surface quality
author_facet K Abinaya
B Muthu Kumar
S C Ahila
author_sort K Abinaya
title Evaluation of surface quality of silicone impression materials after disinfection with ozone water: An In vitro Study
title_short Evaluation of surface quality of silicone impression materials after disinfection with ozone water: An In vitro Study
title_full Evaluation of surface quality of silicone impression materials after disinfection with ozone water: An In vitro Study
title_fullStr Evaluation of surface quality of silicone impression materials after disinfection with ozone water: An In vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of surface quality of silicone impression materials after disinfection with ozone water: An In vitro Study
title_sort evaluation of surface quality of silicone impression materials after disinfection with ozone water: an in vitro study
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Contemporary Clinical Dentistry
issn 0976-237X
0976-2361
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Purpose: To compare and evaluate the surface quality of silicone impression materials after ozone water disinfection. Materials and Methods: A total of 60 samples were prepared on a stainless steel die (American Dental Association specification no. 19 and International Standard of Organization - 4823). The samples were divided into four groups; each group contains 15 samples. Group A as control, Group B, C, and D disinfected with 2% glutaraldehyde, 5.25% sodium hypochlorite, and ozone water, respectively. The samples were made according to the manufacturer's instructions, and the samples were allowed to set in a thermostatically controlled water bath at 35°C ± 1°C and retrieved after 10 min. The surface qualities of the samples were measured in stereomicroscope with ×20 magnification. Results: The data obtained were analyzed using Chi-square test, and the “P” value was calculated. The results showed that there were no differences in the surface quality among the Groups A, C, and D for addition silicone putty and light body and medium body impression materials than the Group B. Conclusion: This study concluded that ozone water disinfection showed least changes when compared to 5.25%sodium hypochloride and 2% glutaraldehyde disinfection for addition silicone putty , light body and medium body impression materials.
topic Disinfection
O3 water
silicone impression material
surface quality
url http://www.contempclindent.org/article.asp?issn=0976-237X;year=2018;volume=9;issue=1;spage=60;epage=64;aulast=Abinaya
work_keys_str_mv AT kabinaya evaluationofsurfacequalityofsiliconeimpressionmaterialsafterdisinfectionwithozonewateraninvitrostudy
AT bmuthukumar evaluationofsurfacequalityofsiliconeimpressionmaterialsafterdisinfectionwithozonewateraninvitrostudy
AT scahila evaluationofsurfacequalityofsiliconeimpressionmaterialsafterdisinfectionwithozonewateraninvitrostudy
_version_ 1725519544598921216