Evaluation of surface quality of silicone impression materials after disinfection with ozone water: An In vitro Study
Purpose: To compare and evaluate the surface quality of silicone impression materials after ozone water disinfection. Materials and Methods: A total of 60 samples were prepared on a stainless steel die (American Dental Association specification no. 19 and International Standard of Organization - 482...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2018-01-01
|
Series: | Contemporary Clinical Dentistry |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.contempclindent.org/article.asp?issn=0976-237X;year=2018;volume=9;issue=1;spage=60;epage=64;aulast=Abinaya |
id |
doaj-fe7093b9e466449ba08c59dc1c6d141f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-fe7093b9e466449ba08c59dc1c6d141f2020-11-24T23:37:35ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsContemporary Clinical Dentistry0976-237X0976-23612018-01-0191606410.4103/ccd.ccd_747_17Evaluation of surface quality of silicone impression materials after disinfection with ozone water: An In vitro StudyK AbinayaB Muthu KumarS C AhilaPurpose: To compare and evaluate the surface quality of silicone impression materials after ozone water disinfection. Materials and Methods: A total of 60 samples were prepared on a stainless steel die (American Dental Association specification no. 19 and International Standard of Organization - 4823). The samples were divided into four groups; each group contains 15 samples. Group A as control, Group B, C, and D disinfected with 2% glutaraldehyde, 5.25% sodium hypochlorite, and ozone water, respectively. The samples were made according to the manufacturer's instructions, and the samples were allowed to set in a thermostatically controlled water bath at 35°C ± 1°C and retrieved after 10 min. The surface qualities of the samples were measured in stereomicroscope with ×20 magnification. Results: The data obtained were analyzed using Chi-square test, and the “P” value was calculated. The results showed that there were no differences in the surface quality among the Groups A, C, and D for addition silicone putty and light body and medium body impression materials than the Group B. Conclusion: This study concluded that ozone water disinfection showed least changes when compared to 5.25%sodium hypochloride and 2% glutaraldehyde disinfection for addition silicone putty , light body and medium body impression materials.http://www.contempclindent.org/article.asp?issn=0976-237X;year=2018;volume=9;issue=1;spage=60;epage=64;aulast=AbinayaDisinfectionO3 watersilicone impression materialsurface quality |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
K Abinaya B Muthu Kumar S C Ahila |
spellingShingle |
K Abinaya B Muthu Kumar S C Ahila Evaluation of surface quality of silicone impression materials after disinfection with ozone water: An In vitro Study Contemporary Clinical Dentistry Disinfection O3 water silicone impression material surface quality |
author_facet |
K Abinaya B Muthu Kumar S C Ahila |
author_sort |
K Abinaya |
title |
Evaluation of surface quality of silicone impression materials after disinfection with ozone water: An In vitro Study |
title_short |
Evaluation of surface quality of silicone impression materials after disinfection with ozone water: An In vitro Study |
title_full |
Evaluation of surface quality of silicone impression materials after disinfection with ozone water: An In vitro Study |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of surface quality of silicone impression materials after disinfection with ozone water: An In vitro Study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of surface quality of silicone impression materials after disinfection with ozone water: An In vitro Study |
title_sort |
evaluation of surface quality of silicone impression materials after disinfection with ozone water: an in vitro study |
publisher |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
series |
Contemporary Clinical Dentistry |
issn |
0976-237X 0976-2361 |
publishDate |
2018-01-01 |
description |
Purpose: To compare and evaluate the surface quality of silicone impression materials after ozone water disinfection. Materials and Methods: A total of 60 samples were prepared on a stainless steel die (American Dental Association specification no. 19 and International Standard of Organization - 4823). The samples were divided into four groups; each group contains 15 samples. Group A as control, Group B, C, and D disinfected with 2% glutaraldehyde, 5.25% sodium hypochlorite, and ozone water, respectively. The samples were made according to the manufacturer's instructions, and the samples were allowed to set in a thermostatically controlled water bath at 35°C ± 1°C and retrieved after 10 min. The surface qualities of the samples were measured in stereomicroscope with ×20 magnification. Results: The data obtained were analyzed using Chi-square test, and the “P” value was calculated. The results showed that there were no differences in the surface quality among the Groups A, C, and D for addition silicone putty and light body and medium body impression materials than the Group B. Conclusion: This study concluded that ozone water disinfection showed least changes when compared to 5.25%sodium hypochloride and 2% glutaraldehyde disinfection for addition silicone putty , light body and medium body impression materials. |
topic |
Disinfection O3 water silicone impression material surface quality |
url |
http://www.contempclindent.org/article.asp?issn=0976-237X;year=2018;volume=9;issue=1;spage=60;epage=64;aulast=Abinaya |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kabinaya evaluationofsurfacequalityofsiliconeimpressionmaterialsafterdisinfectionwithozonewateraninvitrostudy AT bmuthukumar evaluationofsurfacequalityofsiliconeimpressionmaterialsafterdisinfectionwithozonewateraninvitrostudy AT scahila evaluationofsurfacequalityofsiliconeimpressionmaterialsafterdisinfectionwithozonewateraninvitrostudy |
_version_ |
1725519544598921216 |